Extinction and the loss of functional diversity

O. Petchey, K. Gaston
{"title":"Extinction and the loss of functional diversity","authors":"O. Petchey, K. Gaston","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2002.2073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although it is widely thought to influence ecosystem processes, there is little consensus on an appropriate measure of functional diversity. The two major perspectives, to date, are to assume that every species is functionally unique, or to assume that some species are functionally identical, such that functional groups exist. Using a continuous measure of functional diversity (FD) derived from the quantitative functional traits of species, we show that the loss of functional diversity from six natural assemblages was rapid compared with rates of loss from comparable simulated assemblages. Loss of FD occurred faster than loss of functional–group diversity in four of the six natural assemblages. Patterns of functional–group diversity loss depended on the number of functional groups and the number of species in an assemblage. Extinctions that occurred first for species with particular traits (e.g. low leaf nitrogen concentration, deep roots and large body size) caused greater loss of FD than expected by chance in four of the six natural assemblages. In two real assemblages, these trait–dependent extinctions had more severe effects on FD than our simulated worst–case extinction scenario. These data suggest that conserving a large proportion of the functional traits of species requires conserving a large proportion of all species.","PeriodicalId":20585,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"254","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 254

Abstract

Although it is widely thought to influence ecosystem processes, there is little consensus on an appropriate measure of functional diversity. The two major perspectives, to date, are to assume that every species is functionally unique, or to assume that some species are functionally identical, such that functional groups exist. Using a continuous measure of functional diversity (FD) derived from the quantitative functional traits of species, we show that the loss of functional diversity from six natural assemblages was rapid compared with rates of loss from comparable simulated assemblages. Loss of FD occurred faster than loss of functional–group diversity in four of the six natural assemblages. Patterns of functional–group diversity loss depended on the number of functional groups and the number of species in an assemblage. Extinctions that occurred first for species with particular traits (e.g. low leaf nitrogen concentration, deep roots and large body size) caused greater loss of FD than expected by chance in four of the six natural assemblages. In two real assemblages, these trait–dependent extinctions had more severe effects on FD than our simulated worst–case extinction scenario. These data suggest that conserving a large proportion of the functional traits of species requires conserving a large proportion of all species.
灭绝和功能多样性的丧失
虽然人们普遍认为它会影响生态系统过程,但对功能多样性的适当衡量标准却很少达成共识。到目前为止,两种主要的观点是假设每个物种的功能都是独特的,或者假设一些物种的功能是相同的,这样功能群就存在了。利用基于物种数量功能特征的功能多样性(FD)的连续测量,我们发现,与类似的模拟组合相比,六个自然组合的功能多样性损失速度更快。在6个自然组合中的4个中,FD的丧失速度快于功能群多样性的丧失。功能类群多样性丧失的模式取决于功能类群的数量和群落中物种的数量。在6个自然组合中,有4个具有特定性状(如叶片氮浓度低、根系深和体型大)的物种首先灭绝,导致FD的损失大于偶然预期。在两个真实的组合中,这些性状依赖的灭绝对FD的影响比我们模拟的最坏情况下的灭绝情况更严重。这些数据表明,保护物种的大部分功能特征需要保护所有物种的大部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信