Combination of symmetry point of criterion, compromise ranking of alternatives from distance to ideal solution and collaborative unbiased rank list integration methods for woodworking machinery selection for small business in Vietnam

Q3 Engineering
Tran Van Dua
{"title":"Combination of symmetry point of criterion, compromise ranking of alternatives from distance to ideal solution and collaborative unbiased rank list integration methods for woodworking machinery selection for small business in Vietnam","authors":"Tran Van Dua","doi":"10.21303/2461-4262.2023.002763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Woodworking industry plays an important role in the development of Vietnam’s economy. The efficiency of woodworking process depends a lot on the machinery used in the woodworking process. Selecting the best option among a variety of machines is tedious and complex work. However, if the choice of machine is based only on the subjective opinion of the customer, it will lead to mistakes. That mistake is understood that the customer will choose the option that is not the best among the machines proposed by the supplier. Instead, machine selection must be based on all machine parameters. This is called multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). There are MCDM methods, when used it is necessary to know the weights of the criteria. However, there are also methods that do not need to know the weights of the criteria. CRADIS (Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution) is a method that, when used, is required to weight the criteria. In contrast, this problem is unnecessary when using the CURLI (Collaborative Unbiased Rank List Integration) method. In this study, three kinds of machinery commonly used for small business in woodworking field were selected. The three kinds of machinery mentioned in this study include wood milling machine, wood saw machine, wood planer. The SPC (Symmetry Point of Criterion) method was used to calculate the weights of the criteria for each kind of machinery. This is the youngest method among the methods of determining the weights for the criteria, it was only found in 2023. The two methods include CRADIS and CURLI were used to rank the machinery kinds. The result showed that in all the surveyed situation, the best alternative is always determined consistently when using CRADIS and CURLI methods. Accordingly, three best alternatives with three different machinery kinds (milling machine, saw machine and planer) were found in this study","PeriodicalId":11804,"journal":{"name":"EUREKA: Physics and Engineering","volume":"2015 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUREKA: Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2023.002763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Woodworking industry plays an important role in the development of Vietnam’s economy. The efficiency of woodworking process depends a lot on the machinery used in the woodworking process. Selecting the best option among a variety of machines is tedious and complex work. However, if the choice of machine is based only on the subjective opinion of the customer, it will lead to mistakes. That mistake is understood that the customer will choose the option that is not the best among the machines proposed by the supplier. Instead, machine selection must be based on all machine parameters. This is called multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). There are MCDM methods, when used it is necessary to know the weights of the criteria. However, there are also methods that do not need to know the weights of the criteria. CRADIS (Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution) is a method that, when used, is required to weight the criteria. In contrast, this problem is unnecessary when using the CURLI (Collaborative Unbiased Rank List Integration) method. In this study, three kinds of machinery commonly used for small business in woodworking field were selected. The three kinds of machinery mentioned in this study include wood milling machine, wood saw machine, wood planer. The SPC (Symmetry Point of Criterion) method was used to calculate the weights of the criteria for each kind of machinery. This is the youngest method among the methods of determining the weights for the criteria, it was only found in 2023. The two methods include CRADIS and CURLI were used to rank the machinery kinds. The result showed that in all the surveyed situation, the best alternative is always determined consistently when using CRADIS and CURLI methods. Accordingly, three best alternatives with three different machinery kinds (milling machine, saw machine and planer) were found in this study
越南小企业木工机械选择的标准对称点、从距离到理想解的折衷排序与协作无偏排序集成方法的结合
木工行业在越南经济发展中占有重要地位。木工加工的效率在很大程度上取决于木工加工过程中使用的机械。在各种各样的机器中选择最佳选择是一项繁琐而复杂的工作。但是,如果机器的选择仅仅基于客户的主观意见,就会导致错误。这个错误被理解为客户将在供应商提出的机器中选择不是最好的选项。相反,机器选择必须基于所有机器参数。这被称为多标准决策(MCDM)。有MCDM方法,当使用时,有必要知道标准的权重。然而,也有一些方法不需要知道标准的权重。从距离到理想解决方案的折衷排序(CRADIS)是一种使用时需要对标准进行加权的方法。相反,当使用CURLI(协作无偏秩表集成)方法时,这个问题是不必要的。在本研究中,选择了三种小型木工企业常用的机械。本研究中提到的三种机械包括木材铣床、木材锯床、木材刨床。采用标准对称点法(SPC)计算各类机械的标准权值。这是确定标准权重的方法中最年轻的方法,直到2023年才被发现。采用CRADIS和CURLI两种方法对机械种类进行排序。结果表明,在所有的调查情况下,使用CRADIS和CURLI方法确定的最佳方案总是一致的。据此,本研究找到了三种不同机械类型(铣床、锯床和刨床)的三种最佳替代方案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EUREKA: Physics and Engineering
EUREKA: Physics and Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信