Fostering Governance at Remote Marine Protected Areas in Times of Blue Economy: Baseline for Stakeholders Comeposition

Daniel Hauer Queiroz Telles, C. Fassina
{"title":"Fostering Governance at Remote Marine Protected Areas in Times of Blue Economy: Baseline for Stakeholders Comeposition","authors":"Daniel Hauer Queiroz Telles, C. Fassina","doi":"10.34257/gjsfrevol23is1pg39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Blue Economy is an emerging concept that encourages better stewardship of the ocean and associated resources. Turning it into a global issue poses several challenges to ocean conservation effectiveness especially at Remote Marine Protected Areas (ReMPA). How to implement and manage the ReMPAs is still new to modern society, and the participation criteria in the decision-making processes is undermost in a legitimate perspective. The proposed framework highlights the importance of emerging studies to untangle Oceans territorialization and use(r)s, in order to establish composition parameters for shared and realistic management. The initial application is exemplified by taking two Brazilian ReMPA. The preliminary results seek to support the priorities of Scientific innovative methodological appropriation in Ocean decision-making, as envisioning new baselines of legitimacy for ReMPAS governance. Thus, the two asymmetries found represent baseline challenges towards a framework to be considered as a starting point for ReMPA participative governance guidelines. These asymmetries pose emerging questions about how will these territories be governed since the stakeholder’s composition reflections to be considered in future scholars. The three highlights argue about the questions posted above and point preliminary conclusions.","PeriodicalId":12547,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Science Frontier Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Science Frontier Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34257/gjsfrevol23is1pg39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Blue Economy is an emerging concept that encourages better stewardship of the ocean and associated resources. Turning it into a global issue poses several challenges to ocean conservation effectiveness especially at Remote Marine Protected Areas (ReMPA). How to implement and manage the ReMPAs is still new to modern society, and the participation criteria in the decision-making processes is undermost in a legitimate perspective. The proposed framework highlights the importance of emerging studies to untangle Oceans territorialization and use(r)s, in order to establish composition parameters for shared and realistic management. The initial application is exemplified by taking two Brazilian ReMPA. The preliminary results seek to support the priorities of Scientific innovative methodological appropriation in Ocean decision-making, as envisioning new baselines of legitimacy for ReMPAS governance. Thus, the two asymmetries found represent baseline challenges towards a framework to be considered as a starting point for ReMPA participative governance guidelines. These asymmetries pose emerging questions about how will these territories be governed since the stakeholder’s composition reflections to be considered in future scholars. The three highlights argue about the questions posted above and point preliminary conclusions.
在蓝色经济时代促进偏远海洋保护区的治理:利益相关者组合的基线
蓝色经济是一个新兴的概念,鼓励更好地管理海洋和相关资源。将其转变为一个全球性问题,对海洋保护的有效性提出了若干挑战,特别是在偏远海洋保护区(ReMPA)。如何实施和管理环境保护计划对现代社会来说仍然是一个新鲜事物,在决策过程中的参与标准是最不合理的。拟议的框架强调了新兴研究的重要性,以解决海洋的领土化和利用问题,以便为共同和现实的管理建立组成参数。最初的应用以两个巴西ReMPA为例。初步结果旨在支持海洋决策中科学创新方法拨款的优先事项,为ReMPAS治理的合法性设想新的基线。因此,发现的两个不对称代表了对一个框架的基线挑战,该框架将被视为ReMPA参与式治理指导方针的起点。这些不对称提出了关于如何治理这些领土的新问题,因为利益相关者的组成反映了未来学者的考虑。这三个亮点讨论了上面发布的问题,并提出了初步结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信