Od-Kantować Rawlsa: ewolucyjne uzasadnienie teorii sprawiedliwości w ujęciu Kena Binmore’a

Q4 Arts and Humanities
S. Szymański
{"title":"Od-Kantować Rawlsa: ewolucyjne uzasadnienie teorii sprawiedliwości w ujęciu Kena Binmore’a","authors":"S. Szymański","doi":"10.24917/20841043.9.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"De-Kanting Rawls: evolutionary justifcation of the theory of justice by Ken Binmore: \nThe article discusses the criticism of John Rawls’s theory of justice formulated by Ken Binmore. Binmore criticizes Rawls in his work for inadequate justifcation of fairness norms. In \nhis opinion, their proper justifcation requires the rejection of Kant’s “metaphysics” in favor \nof Hume’s empiricism. To explain how fairness norms actually work, one must frst provide \na convincing account of evolutionary processes that could lead to such norms being encoded \nin our genome. Secondly, it should be explained how this biological mechanism interacts with \nour cultural heritage and generates a selection of balance points in games that describe our \nsocial interactions.","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.9.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

De-Kanting Rawls: evolutionary justifcation of the theory of justice by Ken Binmore: The article discusses the criticism of John Rawls’s theory of justice formulated by Ken Binmore. Binmore criticizes Rawls in his work for inadequate justifcation of fairness norms. In his opinion, their proper justifcation requires the rejection of Kant’s “metaphysics” in favor of Hume’s empiricism. To explain how fairness norms actually work, one must frst provide a convincing account of evolutionary processes that could lead to such norms being encoded in our genome. Secondly, it should be explained how this biological mechanism interacts with our cultural heritage and generates a selection of balance points in games that describe our social interactions.
去康德罗尔斯:肯·宾莫尔正义理论的进化论证:本文讨论了肯·宾莫尔对约翰·罗尔斯正义理论的批判。宾莫尔在他的著作中批评罗尔斯对公平规范的论证不足。在他看来,正确的辩护需要抛弃康德的“形而上学”,支持休谟的经验主义。为了解释公平规范实际上是如何起作用的,人们必须首先提供一个令人信服的进化过程,这个过程可能导致这种规范被编码到我们的基因组中。其次,它应该解释这种生物机制如何与我们的文化遗产相互作用,并在描述我们社交互动的游戏中产生一系列平衡点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Argument  Biannual Philosophical Journal
Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信