Quantification of electrosurgery-related critical events during laparoscopic cholecystectomy – a prospective experimental study among surgical novices

4open Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1051/fopen/2022001
J. Rolinger, Nils Model, K. Jansen, Madeleine Knöll, Patrick Beyersdorffer, W. Kunert, S. Axt, A. Kirschniak, P. Wilhelm
{"title":"Quantification of electrosurgery-related critical events during laparoscopic cholecystectomy – a prospective experimental study among surgical novices","authors":"J. Rolinger, Nils Model, K. Jansen, Madeleine Knöll, Patrick Beyersdorffer, W. Kunert, S. Axt, A. Kirschniak, P. Wilhelm","doi":"10.1051/fopen/2022001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uncontrolled movement of instruments in laparoscopic surgery can lead to inadvertent tissue damage, particularly when the dissecting or electrosurgical instrument is located outside the field of view of the laparoscopic camera. The incidence and relevance of such events are currently unknown. The present work aims to identify and quantify potentially dangerous situations using the example of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Twenty-four final year medical students were prompted to each perform four consecutive LC attempts on a well-established box trainer in a surgical training environment following a standardized protocol in a porcine model. The following situation was defined as a critical event (CE): the dissecting instrument was inadvertently located outside the laparoscopic camera’s field of view. Simultaneous activation of the electrosurgical unit was defined as a highly critical event (hCE). Primary endpoint was the incidence of CEs. While performing 96 LCs, 2895 CEs were observed. Of these, 1059 (36.6%) were hCEs. The median number of CEs per LC was 20.5 (range: 1–125; IQR: 33) and the median number of hCEs per LC was 8.0 (range: 0–54, IQR: 10). Mean total operation time was 34.7 min (range: 15.6–62.5 min, IQR: 14.3 min). Our study demonstrates the significance of CEs as a potential risk factor for collateral damage during LC. Further studies are needed to investigate the occurrence of CE in clinical practice, not just for laparoscopic cholecystectomy but also for other procedures. Systematic training of future surgeons as well as technical solutions address this safety issue.","PeriodicalId":6841,"journal":{"name":"4open","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"4open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/fopen/2022001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Uncontrolled movement of instruments in laparoscopic surgery can lead to inadvertent tissue damage, particularly when the dissecting or electrosurgical instrument is located outside the field of view of the laparoscopic camera. The incidence and relevance of such events are currently unknown. The present work aims to identify and quantify potentially dangerous situations using the example of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Twenty-four final year medical students were prompted to each perform four consecutive LC attempts on a well-established box trainer in a surgical training environment following a standardized protocol in a porcine model. The following situation was defined as a critical event (CE): the dissecting instrument was inadvertently located outside the laparoscopic camera’s field of view. Simultaneous activation of the electrosurgical unit was defined as a highly critical event (hCE). Primary endpoint was the incidence of CEs. While performing 96 LCs, 2895 CEs were observed. Of these, 1059 (36.6%) were hCEs. The median number of CEs per LC was 20.5 (range: 1–125; IQR: 33) and the median number of hCEs per LC was 8.0 (range: 0–54, IQR: 10). Mean total operation time was 34.7 min (range: 15.6–62.5 min, IQR: 14.3 min). Our study demonstrates the significance of CEs as a potential risk factor for collateral damage during LC. Further studies are needed to investigate the occurrence of CE in clinical practice, not just for laparoscopic cholecystectomy but also for other procedures. Systematic training of future surgeons as well as technical solutions address this safety issue.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术中电切相关关键事件的量化——一项针对外科新手的前瞻性实验研究
腹腔镜手术中器械的不受控制的运动可能导致无意的组织损伤,特别是当解剖或电手术器械位于腹腔镜摄像机视野之外时。这些事件的发生率和相关性目前尚不清楚。目前的工作旨在识别和量化使用腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的例子潜在的危险情况。24名最后一年级的医学生被要求在一个完善的盒子训练器上按照猪模型的标准化协议在外科训练环境中进行四次连续的LC尝试。以下情况被定义为关键事件(CE):解剖器械不慎位于腹腔镜摄像机视野之外。同时激活电外科单元被定义为高度临界事件(hCE)。主要终点是ce的发生率。在执行96个lc时,观察到2895个ce。其中,hce 1059例(36.6%)。每个LC的ce中位数为20.5(范围:1-125;IQR: 33),每个LC的hce中位数为8.0(范围:0-54,IQR: 10)。平均总手术时间34.7 min(范围:15.6 ~ 62.5 min, IQR: 14.3 min)。我们的研究证明了ce作为LC期间附带损害的潜在危险因素的重要性。需要进一步的研究来调查CE在临床实践中的发生,不仅是在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,而且在其他手术中。对未来外科医生的系统培训以及技术解决方案解决了这一安全问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信