Army Film and the Avant-Garde: Cinema and Experiment in the Czechoslovak Military

IF 0.3 2区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Jonathan L. Owen
{"title":"Army Film and the Avant-Garde: Cinema and Experiment in the Czechoslovak Military","authors":"Jonathan L. Owen","doi":"10.1080/14790963.2016.1356999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"encapsulated within the borders of the GDR, but communicating with the rest of Europe and more importantly with West Germany. Methodologically, the book is grounded in a well-balanced variety of local and central archival sources, with the addition of newspaper sources and interviews. The author divides the book into three large parts, focusing on ‘Player’, ‘Fans’, and ‘The People’s Game’, and thus offering three different, but complementary, views on the interrelationship of football and society. The focus of the first section is on professional players and the so-called ‘Leistungsfußball’ (performance football). The ‘from above’ perspective engages, amongst others, with the above-average privileges of footballers and the negation of their lifestyle(s) in a socialist society. These privileges were, however, often accompanied by state surveillance, leading the book to examine the phenomenon of ‘Republiksflucht’, the escape from the GDR, amongst top footballers and why it nonetheless remained a relatively marginal phenomenon. A particular interest is devoted to the national team and its struggles to foster an East German national identity, as well as to professional club football localisms, which undermined the ideological credo of a unified GDR national culture. The second section offers a juxtaposed ‘from below’ perspective, illustrating what it was like to be a football fan in the GBR, with special attention dedicated to the country’s issue with football hooliganism in the 1970s and 1980s. McDougall demonstrates how the lack of political grip on the game provided a relatively low risk opportunity to express opposition to the state and to reassert, at times radical, ‘Eigen-Sinn’. The third segment deepens the ‘from below’ perspective by examining the role of football in everyday GDR life. Touching upon widely neglected topics such as women’s football, amateur footballing encounters across the East–West divide or state-deficiencies in providing material needs for grassroots football, McDougall shows how these were spaces ‘outside the spotlight’ with significant autonomy from the state. Concluding, the red thread throughout The People’s Game is that football in the GDR (and same is to be said about other totalitarian contexts) can neither be described as a subversive tool in the hands of people opposing the socialist system, nor a political instrument for power holders to propagate their ideological agenda. As shown by McDougall, particularly in its early days, institutional football was far from a central interest for the state, which left organizations rarely staffed with ideologically trained people who were also suitable for the requirements of the job. As a result, grassroots initiatives on a local level as well as local power holders were the driving force of GDR football. That does not mean that the state did not exercise its power. McDougall, however, argues that top-down decision-making, such as club relocations, re-naming, player transfers, favouritisms, and manipulations often only illustrated the limitations of controlling football. The frustration within the state’s power elite over the incapability to control football for their purposes or to stop its constant rise in popularity ultimately mirrored the dysfunctionality of socialist state structures on all societal levels. The book’s strengths are certainly its three levels of research that help to carve out the official and unofficial experiences of football as a contested space. Ultimately, The People’s Game represents an excellent example of research using football to illustrate the colourful ambiguities of everyday life in the GDR.","PeriodicalId":41396,"journal":{"name":"Central Europe","volume":"2016 1","pages":"162 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14790963.2016.1356999","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

encapsulated within the borders of the GDR, but communicating with the rest of Europe and more importantly with West Germany. Methodologically, the book is grounded in a well-balanced variety of local and central archival sources, with the addition of newspaper sources and interviews. The author divides the book into three large parts, focusing on ‘Player’, ‘Fans’, and ‘The People’s Game’, and thus offering three different, but complementary, views on the interrelationship of football and society. The focus of the first section is on professional players and the so-called ‘Leistungsfußball’ (performance football). The ‘from above’ perspective engages, amongst others, with the above-average privileges of footballers and the negation of their lifestyle(s) in a socialist society. These privileges were, however, often accompanied by state surveillance, leading the book to examine the phenomenon of ‘Republiksflucht’, the escape from the GDR, amongst top footballers and why it nonetheless remained a relatively marginal phenomenon. A particular interest is devoted to the national team and its struggles to foster an East German national identity, as well as to professional club football localisms, which undermined the ideological credo of a unified GDR national culture. The second section offers a juxtaposed ‘from below’ perspective, illustrating what it was like to be a football fan in the GBR, with special attention dedicated to the country’s issue with football hooliganism in the 1970s and 1980s. McDougall demonstrates how the lack of political grip on the game provided a relatively low risk opportunity to express opposition to the state and to reassert, at times radical, ‘Eigen-Sinn’. The third segment deepens the ‘from below’ perspective by examining the role of football in everyday GDR life. Touching upon widely neglected topics such as women’s football, amateur footballing encounters across the East–West divide or state-deficiencies in providing material needs for grassroots football, McDougall shows how these were spaces ‘outside the spotlight’ with significant autonomy from the state. Concluding, the red thread throughout The People’s Game is that football in the GDR (and same is to be said about other totalitarian contexts) can neither be described as a subversive tool in the hands of people opposing the socialist system, nor a political instrument for power holders to propagate their ideological agenda. As shown by McDougall, particularly in its early days, institutional football was far from a central interest for the state, which left organizations rarely staffed with ideologically trained people who were also suitable for the requirements of the job. As a result, grassroots initiatives on a local level as well as local power holders were the driving force of GDR football. That does not mean that the state did not exercise its power. McDougall, however, argues that top-down decision-making, such as club relocations, re-naming, player transfers, favouritisms, and manipulations often only illustrated the limitations of controlling football. The frustration within the state’s power elite over the incapability to control football for their purposes or to stop its constant rise in popularity ultimately mirrored the dysfunctionality of socialist state structures on all societal levels. The book’s strengths are certainly its three levels of research that help to carve out the official and unofficial experiences of football as a contested space. Ultimately, The People’s Game represents an excellent example of research using football to illustrate the colourful ambiguities of everyday life in the GDR.
军队电影和先锋派:捷克斯洛伐克军队中的电影和实验
它被封闭在德意志民主共和国的边界内,但与欧洲其他国家,更重要的是与西德进行交流。在方法上,这本书是建立在一个平衡的各种地方和中央档案来源,加上报纸来源和采访。作者将本书分为三大部分,分别关注“球员”、“球迷”和“人民的比赛”,从而为足球与社会的相互关系提供了三种不同但互补的观点。第一部分的重点是职业球员和所谓的“Leistungsfußball”(表演足球)。“从上面”的角度来看,其中包括足球运动员高于平均水平的特权和对他们在社会主义社会生活方式的否定。然而,这些特权往往伴随着国家的监视,这使得这本书审视了顶级足球运动员中“共和国逃亡”(Republiksflucht)现象,以及为什么它仍然是一个相对边缘的现象。他特别关注的是国家队及其培养东德民族认同的努力,以及职业足球俱乐部的本土化,这破坏了统一的东德民族文化的意识形态信条。第二部分提供了一个并列的“从下面”的视角,说明了在GBR中作为一个足球迷是什么样子的,并特别关注了这个国家在20世纪70年代和80年代的足球流氓问题。麦克杜格尔展示了缺乏政治控制的游戏如何提供了一个相对低风险的机会来表达对国家的反对,并重申,有时是激进的,“爱根-新”。第三部分通过考察足球在德意志民主共和国日常生活中的作用,深化了“自下而上”的视角。麦克杜格尔谈到了一些被广泛忽视的话题,比如女子足球、跨越东西方鸿沟的业余足球比赛,或者国家在为基层足球提供物质需求方面的不足,他展示了这些“聚光灯之外”的空间是如何从国家获得重大自主权的。最后,贯穿《人民的游戏》的红线是,在民主德国,足球既不能被描述为反对社会主义制度的人手中的颠覆工具,也不能被描述为权力持有者宣传其意识形态议程的政治工具。正如麦克杜格尔所表明的那样,特别是在早期,机构足球远不是国家的中心利益,这使得组织很少配备受过思想训练的人,这些人也适合这项工作的要求。因此,地方一级的基层倡议以及地方权力所有者是德意志民主共和国足球的推动力。这并不意味着国家没有行使它的权力。然而,麦克杜格尔认为,自上而下的决策,如俱乐部搬迁、重新命名、球员转会、偏袒和操纵,往往只能说明控制足球的局限性。国家权力精英对无法控制足球达到他们的目的或阻止其不断上升的受欢迎程度感到沮丧,最终反映了社会主义国家结构在各个社会层面的功能失调。这本书的优势当然是它的三个层次的研究,这有助于把足球作为一个有争议的空间的官方和非官方的经验划分出来。最终,《人民的游戏》是一个很好的例子,它用足球来说明德意志民主共和国日常生活中丰富多彩的模糊之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central Europe
Central Europe HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Central Europe publishes original research articles on the history, languages, literature, political culture, music, arts and society of those lands once part of the Habsburg Monarchy and Poland-Lithuania from the Middle Ages to the present. It also publishes discussion papers, marginalia, book, archive, exhibition, music and film reviews. Central Europe has been established as a refereed journal to foster the worldwide study of the area and to provide a forum for the academic discussion of Central European life and institutions. From time to time an issue will be devoted to a particular theme, based on a selection of papers presented at an international conference or seminar series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信