Reservoir Characterization for Uncertainty Analysis and Its Impact on CO2 Injection and Sequestration in a Depleted Offshore Carbonate Gas Field

Dr. Rabindra Das, P. A. Patil, P. Tiwari, R. Leite, R. Tewari
{"title":"Reservoir Characterization for Uncertainty Analysis and Its Impact on CO2 Injection and Sequestration in a Depleted Offshore Carbonate Gas Field","authors":"Dr. Rabindra Das, P. A. Patil, P. Tiwari, R. Leite, R. Tewari","doi":"10.2118/205706-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The emerging global climate change policies have necessitated the strategic need for prudent management of produced contaminants and, with cold flaring being no more the best option, Carbon Capture Utilization & Storage (CCUS) technology provides opportunity for development of high CO2 contaminant fields. A typical CO2 sequestration project comprises capturing CO2 by separating from produced hydrocarbons followed by injection of CO2 into deep geological formations for long term storage. While injection ofCO2 may continue over tens of years, the long-term containment needs to be ascertained for thousands of years. Several geological and geophysical factors along with the existingwells need to be evaluated to assess the potential risks for CO2 leakage that maychallenge the long-term containment.\n This study considers a depleted carbonate field located offshore Sarawak as a possible long-term CO2 storage site. Elements that may lead to possible leakage of CO2over time are the existing faults or fractures, development of new fractures/faults during injection, caprock failure due to pressures exceeding fracture pressure during/after injection and possible leakage through existing wells. The risk assessment process includes identification and mapping of faults and fracture networks, mapping of seals, evaluation of seismic anomalies and gas while drilling records, pore-pressure analysis, laboratory experiments for analyzing changes in geomechanical & geochemical rock properties and well integrity of existing wells. All these parameters are cross correlated, and qualitative risk categorization is carried out to determine the robustness of the reservoir for long term CO2 storage.\n The evaluation of available data indicates less frequent faulting occur only towards the flank with no seismic anomalies associated with them. Some seismic anomalies are observed at shallower levels, however their impact on the reservoir and overburden integrity is assessed to be minimum. There are four shale dominated formations mapped in the overburden section, which will act as potential seals. Estimated fracture pressures for the potential seals ranges between 6200-9280 psia for the deepest seal to 2910-4290 psia for the shallowest. Therefore,it is interpreted that if the post injection reservoir pressure is kept below the initial reservoir pressure of 4480 psia, it would not hold any threat to the caprock integrity.Leakage rate riskalong the existing wells was determined based on well log data. Well integrity check of legacywells helped identify two abandoned wells for rigorous remediation to restore their integrity.\n The subsurface risk analysis is critical to ascertain the long-term containment of injectedCO2. The integrated subsurface characterization and well integrity analysis approach adopted in this work can be applied to any other field/reservoir to validate its robustness for long-term CO2 injection and storage.","PeriodicalId":11052,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/205706-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The emerging global climate change policies have necessitated the strategic need for prudent management of produced contaminants and, with cold flaring being no more the best option, Carbon Capture Utilization & Storage (CCUS) technology provides opportunity for development of high CO2 contaminant fields. A typical CO2 sequestration project comprises capturing CO2 by separating from produced hydrocarbons followed by injection of CO2 into deep geological formations for long term storage. While injection ofCO2 may continue over tens of years, the long-term containment needs to be ascertained for thousands of years. Several geological and geophysical factors along with the existingwells need to be evaluated to assess the potential risks for CO2 leakage that maychallenge the long-term containment. This study considers a depleted carbonate field located offshore Sarawak as a possible long-term CO2 storage site. Elements that may lead to possible leakage of CO2over time are the existing faults or fractures, development of new fractures/faults during injection, caprock failure due to pressures exceeding fracture pressure during/after injection and possible leakage through existing wells. The risk assessment process includes identification and mapping of faults and fracture networks, mapping of seals, evaluation of seismic anomalies and gas while drilling records, pore-pressure analysis, laboratory experiments for analyzing changes in geomechanical & geochemical rock properties and well integrity of existing wells. All these parameters are cross correlated, and qualitative risk categorization is carried out to determine the robustness of the reservoir for long term CO2 storage. The evaluation of available data indicates less frequent faulting occur only towards the flank with no seismic anomalies associated with them. Some seismic anomalies are observed at shallower levels, however their impact on the reservoir and overburden integrity is assessed to be minimum. There are four shale dominated formations mapped in the overburden section, which will act as potential seals. Estimated fracture pressures for the potential seals ranges between 6200-9280 psia for the deepest seal to 2910-4290 psia for the shallowest. Therefore,it is interpreted that if the post injection reservoir pressure is kept below the initial reservoir pressure of 4480 psia, it would not hold any threat to the caprock integrity.Leakage rate riskalong the existing wells was determined based on well log data. Well integrity check of legacywells helped identify two abandoned wells for rigorous remediation to restore their integrity. The subsurface risk analysis is critical to ascertain the long-term containment of injectedCO2. The integrated subsurface characterization and well integrity analysis approach adopted in this work can be applied to any other field/reservoir to validate its robustness for long-term CO2 injection and storage.
海上枯竭碳酸盐岩气田储层特征不确定性分析及其对CO2注入和封存的影响
新兴的全球气候变化政策要求对产生的污染物进行谨慎管理,并且由于冷燃不再是最佳选择,碳捕集利用与封存(CCUS)技术为开发高二氧化碳污染物领域提供了机会。一个典型的二氧化碳封存项目包括从生产的碳氢化合物中分离二氧化碳,然后将二氧化碳注入深层地质构造进行长期储存。虽然二氧化碳的注入可能会持续数十年,但需要确定数千年的长期遏制措施。需要对几个地质和地球物理因素以及现有油井进行评估,以评估可能挑战长期控制的二氧化碳泄漏的潜在风险。这项研究认为,位于沙捞越近海的一个枯竭的碳酸盐岩油田可能是一个长期的二氧化碳储存地点。随着时间的推移,可能导致二氧化碳泄漏的因素包括现有的断层或裂缝、注入过程中新裂缝/断层的发育、注入过程中/之后压力超过裂缝压力导致的盖层破坏以及现有井可能发生的泄漏。风险评估过程包括断层和裂缝网络的识别和测绘、密封的测绘、地震异常和钻井时气体记录的评估、孔隙压力分析、用于分析地质力学和地球化学岩石性质变化的实验室实验以及现有井的井完整性。所有这些参数都是交叉相关的,并进行了定性风险分类,以确定水库长期二氧化碳储存的稳健性。对现有数据的评估表明,断层发生的频率较低,只发生在侧面,没有地震异常与之相关。在较浅的层位也观察到一些地震异常,但它们对储层和覆盖层完整性的影响被评估为最小。在上覆岩段圈定了4个页岩占主导地位的储层,具有潜在的封闭作用。估计潜在密封的破裂压力范围在最深的6200-9280 psia到最浅的2910-4290 psia之间。因此,如果注入后储层压力保持在初始储层压力4480 psia以下,则不会对盖层完整性构成威胁。根据测井数据确定了现有井的泄漏率风险。对老井的完整性检查帮助确定了两口废弃井,并进行了严格的修复以恢复其完整性。地下风险分析对于确定注入二氧化碳的长期控制至关重要。这项工作中采用的综合地下表征和井完整性分析方法可以应用于任何其他油田/油藏,以验证其长期注入和储存二氧化碳的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信