Observations on Methamphetamine Enantiomers

Richard Thomas, N. Chandler, A. Pesce
{"title":"Observations on Methamphetamine Enantiomers","authors":"Richard Thomas, N. Chandler, A. Pesce","doi":"10.4172/2161-0495.1000387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methamphetamine is a commonly used illegal drug and the use of the d form of methamphetamine (MAMP) can have serious implications for a patient’s treatment. Thus, correct identification of d methamphetamine is critical when releasing methamphetamine results although most reported positives are the result of illicit use, a small but significant number of MAMP positive findings can be from the use of medications that either contain or can be metabolized to MAMP. Neither common immunoassay screens nor routine mass spectral confirmatory methods can distinguish between the two forms of the drug because both forms have the same elemental composition and only differ in their orientation at the drug’s asymmetric carbon. Chromatographic chiral analysis which is a separation technique based upon the asymmetric carbon is used to resolve the drug into its enantiomeric forms. Historically, the test to differentiate the enantiomers has been time consuming requiring derivatization of the MAMP and a separate analytical system. The advent of newer chiral columns eliminates the need for derivatization and makes the analytical process simpler to automate. Federal workplace drug testing programs have established a threshold of 20% d-MAMP to distinguish between the legal and illegal use. The purpose of this study was to characterize positive MAMP results in the population of our test patients using both the derivatized and non-derivatized analytical procedures. The test population consisted of specimens collected from pain clinics and rehabilitation facilities. Of the 252,800 specimens tested between 3/28/16 and 2/3/17, we observed 11,264 specimens above our lower limit of quantitation of 50 ng/ml for methamphetamine. The average MAMP concentration was 32,530 ng/mL, while the median concentration was 27,882 ng/mL. There were 198 specimens in with 20% to 60% of the d enantiomer while 142 specimens contained greater than 99% of the l isomer. The average concentration of the d isomer value was 2074 ng/mL. The median concentration of the l isomer specimens was 166 ng/mL. However, 5 of these specimens contained MAMP concentrations greater than 20,000 ng/mL. Both methods of isomer analysis gave similar results with the d isomer measured to being 99% or greater in purity.","PeriodicalId":15433,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Toxicology","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0495.1000387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methamphetamine is a commonly used illegal drug and the use of the d form of methamphetamine (MAMP) can have serious implications for a patient’s treatment. Thus, correct identification of d methamphetamine is critical when releasing methamphetamine results although most reported positives are the result of illicit use, a small but significant number of MAMP positive findings can be from the use of medications that either contain or can be metabolized to MAMP. Neither common immunoassay screens nor routine mass spectral confirmatory methods can distinguish between the two forms of the drug because both forms have the same elemental composition and only differ in their orientation at the drug’s asymmetric carbon. Chromatographic chiral analysis which is a separation technique based upon the asymmetric carbon is used to resolve the drug into its enantiomeric forms. Historically, the test to differentiate the enantiomers has been time consuming requiring derivatization of the MAMP and a separate analytical system. The advent of newer chiral columns eliminates the need for derivatization and makes the analytical process simpler to automate. Federal workplace drug testing programs have established a threshold of 20% d-MAMP to distinguish between the legal and illegal use. The purpose of this study was to characterize positive MAMP results in the population of our test patients using both the derivatized and non-derivatized analytical procedures. The test population consisted of specimens collected from pain clinics and rehabilitation facilities. Of the 252,800 specimens tested between 3/28/16 and 2/3/17, we observed 11,264 specimens above our lower limit of quantitation of 50 ng/ml for methamphetamine. The average MAMP concentration was 32,530 ng/mL, while the median concentration was 27,882 ng/mL. There were 198 specimens in with 20% to 60% of the d enantiomer while 142 specimens contained greater than 99% of the l isomer. The average concentration of the d isomer value was 2074 ng/mL. The median concentration of the l isomer specimens was 166 ng/mL. However, 5 of these specimens contained MAMP concentrations greater than 20,000 ng/mL. Both methods of isomer analysis gave similar results with the d isomer measured to being 99% or greater in purity.
甲基苯丙胺对映体的观察
甲基苯丙胺是一种常用的非法药物,使用d型甲基苯丙胺(MAMP)会对患者的治疗产生严重影响。因此,在公布甲基苯丙胺检测结果时,正确识别d -甲基苯丙胺至关重要,尽管大多数报告的阳性结果是非法使用的结果,但少数但重要的MAMP阳性结果可能来自使用含有MAMP或可代谢为MAMP的药物。普通的免疫分析筛选和常规的质谱确认方法都不能区分药物的两种形式,因为两种形式具有相同的元素组成,只是在药物的不对称碳上的取向不同。色谱手性分析是一种基于不对称碳的分离技术,用于将药物分解成对映体形式。从历史上看,区分对映体的测试是耗时的,需要衍生化MAMP和一个单独的分析系统。新的手性柱的出现消除了衍生化的需要,使分析过程更容易自动化。联邦工作场所药物测试项目已经建立了20% d-MAMP的门槛,以区分合法和非法使用。本研究的目的是利用衍生化和非衍生化分析方法在我们的测试患者群体中表征阳性的MAMP结果。试验人群包括从疼痛诊所和康复设施收集的标本。在2016年3月28日至17年2月3日期间检测的252,800个标本中,我们观察到11,264个标本的甲基苯丙胺含量高于50 ng/ml的定量下限。MAMP的平均浓度为32,530 ng/mL,中位浓度为27,882 ng/mL。d对映体含量在20% ~ 60%之间的样品198份,l对映体含量在99%以上的样品142份。d异构体的平均浓度为2074 ng/mL。l异构体标本中位浓度为166 ng/mL。然而,其中5个标本的MAMP浓度大于20,000 ng/mL。两种异构体分析方法的结果相似,d异构体的纯度均为99%或更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信