Disability Studies

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Amanda Dilodovico
{"title":"Disability Studies","authors":"Amanda Dilodovico","doi":"10.1093/ywcct/mbab006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This chapter reviews recent publications in the field of disability studies on disability and criminal justice systems, particularly through the processes of institutionalization and incarceration. The main texts that serve as the corpus for this review define disability broadly, though devote analysis to historical constructions of intellectual/developmental disability and psychosocial disorders, labels that are critically evaluated in each text as well as in this review. By concentrating on institutionalization and incarceration, these texts are specifically focused on how ‘disability’ is entangled in the criminal justice systems of Anglo legal structures (USA, Canada, England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, New Zealand/Aotearoa, Australia) that developed out of English-speaking imperial forces. Specifically, these texts take issue with the idea that the process of deinstitutionalization, the movement of disabled individuals from enclosed facilities to inclusive community settings, was successful in liberating disabled individuals, specifically disabled black, Indigenous populations. This chapter proceeds in four sections. First, we focus on the contemporary definitions of institutionalization and incarceration across the different legal systems traversed by each author. Second, we consider the organizing tension of neoliberal capitalism as a framework through which to analyze and critique continued forms of institutionalization and incarceration. Third, we observe the need to center disabled black, Indigenous experiences of incarceration and institutionalization under the auspices of ‘inclusion’ in the supposed era of deinstitutionalization. Lastly, we move through the alternatives to the forms of institutionalization and incarceration assessed in these texts and offer directions for further critical thought.","PeriodicalId":35040,"journal":{"name":"Year''s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Year''s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ywcct/mbab006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter reviews recent publications in the field of disability studies on disability and criminal justice systems, particularly through the processes of institutionalization and incarceration. The main texts that serve as the corpus for this review define disability broadly, though devote analysis to historical constructions of intellectual/developmental disability and psychosocial disorders, labels that are critically evaluated in each text as well as in this review. By concentrating on institutionalization and incarceration, these texts are specifically focused on how ‘disability’ is entangled in the criminal justice systems of Anglo legal structures (USA, Canada, England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, New Zealand/Aotearoa, Australia) that developed out of English-speaking imperial forces. Specifically, these texts take issue with the idea that the process of deinstitutionalization, the movement of disabled individuals from enclosed facilities to inclusive community settings, was successful in liberating disabled individuals, specifically disabled black, Indigenous populations. This chapter proceeds in four sections. First, we focus on the contemporary definitions of institutionalization and incarceration across the different legal systems traversed by each author. Second, we consider the organizing tension of neoliberal capitalism as a framework through which to analyze and critique continued forms of institutionalization and incarceration. Third, we observe the need to center disabled black, Indigenous experiences of incarceration and institutionalization under the auspices of ‘inclusion’ in the supposed era of deinstitutionalization. Lastly, we move through the alternatives to the forms of institutionalization and incarceration assessed in these texts and offer directions for further critical thought.
残疾研究
本章回顾了最近关于残疾和刑事司法系统的残疾研究领域的出版物,特别是通过机构化和监禁的过程。作为本综述语料库的主要文本广泛地定义了残疾,尽管对智力/发育残疾和社会心理障碍的历史结构进行了分析,这些标签在每个文本和本综述中都进行了批判性评估。通过关注制度化和监禁,这些文本特别关注“残疾”如何与盎格鲁法律结构(美国、加拿大、英格兰、苏格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰、爱尔兰共和国、新西兰/奥特罗亚、澳大利亚)的刑事司法系统纠缠在一起,这些法律结构是从说英语的帝国势力发展而来的。具体来说,这些文本反对这样一种观点,即去机构化的过程,即残疾人从封闭的设施向包容性社区环境的运动,在解放残疾人方面是成功的,特别是残疾的黑人,土著居民。本章分为四个部分。首先,我们关注的是不同法律体系中制度化和监禁的当代定义。其次,我们将新自由主义资本主义的组织张力视为一个框架,通过它来分析和批判持续形式的制度化和监禁。第三,我们观察到,在所谓的去机构化时代,在“包容”的支持下,有必要将残疾黑人、土著的监禁和机构化经历放在中心位置。最后,我们将通过这些文本中评估的制度化和监禁形式的替代方案,并为进一步的批判性思考提供方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Year''s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory
Year''s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信