The Brain Networks Basis for Deductive and Inductive Reasoning: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Seyyedeh Fatemeh Seyyed Hashemi, Mehdi Tehrani-Doost, Reza Khosrowabadi
{"title":"The Brain Networks Basis for Deductive and Inductive Reasoning: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.","authors":"Seyyedeh Fatemeh Seyyed Hashemi, Mehdi Tehrani-Doost, Reza Khosrowabadi","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2022.3752.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frontoparietal (FPN) and cingulo-opercular network (CON) control cognitive functions needed in deductive and inductive reasoning via different functional frameworks. The FPN is a fast intuitive system while the CON is slow and analytical. The default-interventionist model presents a serial view of the interaction between intuitive and analytic cognitive systems. This study aims to examine the activity pattern of the FPN and CON from the perspective of the default-interventionist model via reasoning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate cingulo-opercular and frontoparietal network activities in 24 healthy university students during Raven and Wason reasoning tasks. Due to the different operation times of the CON and FPN, the reaction time was assessed as a behavioral factor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During Raven's advanced progressive matrices (RAPM) test, both the CON and FPN were activated. Also, with the increase in the difficulty level of the Raven test, a linear increase in response time was observed. In contrast, during the Wason's selection task (WST) test, only the activity of FPN was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the study support the hypothesis that the default-interventionist model of dual-process theory provides an accurate explanation of the cognitive mechanisms involved in reasoning. Thus, the response method (intuitive/analytical) determines which cognitive skills and brain regions are involved in responding.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>The cingulo-opercular and fronto-parietal networks (FPNs) control cognitive functions and processes.The frontoparietal network is a fast intuitive system that utilizes short-time attention which is compatible with type 1 processing. In contrast, the cingulo-opercular network (CON) is an analytical time-consuming system that utilizes attention and working memory for a longer time, compatible with type 2 processing.The default-interventionist model of a dual-process theory states that our behaviors are controlled by type 1 processing unless we are confronted with novel and complex problems in which we have no prior experiences.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>The present study examined the activity of two task-based brain networks through performing diffrent type of reasoning tasks. Fronto-parietal and Cingulo-opercular are the two task-based brain networks that are responsible for cognitive control. These two brain networks direct the way to use cognitive skills and executive functions which are necessary to perform cognitive tasks especially higher-order ones as reasoning tasks. Since the two types of inductive and deductive reasoning tasks requier two different bottom-up and top-down cognitive control respectively, different cognitive skills would be needed which affect the activity of fronto-parietal and cingulo-opercular brain networks. Our results showed that through inductive reasoning task which examined by RAVEN, both of the fronto-parietal and cingulo-opercular brain networks were activated but deductive reasoning task which examined by Wason Selection Card test, just the fronto-parietal brain network was activated. It seems that in the case of deductive reasoninf task, there is a higher probability of errors which lead to giving less correct responses. Based on our results, subjects paid not enough attention to details, so had failure to update informations that leaded to responding with errors. Inactivity of cingulo-opercular network through dedeuctive reasoning task clearly showed that the bottom-up cognitive control did not happen successfully. As a result of that, information processing did not proceed properly.</p>","PeriodicalId":49459,"journal":{"name":"Survey Review","volume":"45 1","pages":"529-542"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2022.3752.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Frontoparietal (FPN) and cingulo-opercular network (CON) control cognitive functions needed in deductive and inductive reasoning via different functional frameworks. The FPN is a fast intuitive system while the CON is slow and analytical. The default-interventionist model presents a serial view of the interaction between intuitive and analytic cognitive systems. This study aims to examine the activity pattern of the FPN and CON from the perspective of the default-interventionist model via reasoning.

Methods: We employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate cingulo-opercular and frontoparietal network activities in 24 healthy university students during Raven and Wason reasoning tasks. Due to the different operation times of the CON and FPN, the reaction time was assessed as a behavioral factor.

Results: During Raven's advanced progressive matrices (RAPM) test, both the CON and FPN were activated. Also, with the increase in the difficulty level of the Raven test, a linear increase in response time was observed. In contrast, during the Wason's selection task (WST) test, only the activity of FPN was observed.

Conclusion: The results of the study support the hypothesis that the default-interventionist model of dual-process theory provides an accurate explanation of the cognitive mechanisms involved in reasoning. Thus, the response method (intuitive/analytical) determines which cognitive skills and brain regions are involved in responding.

Highlights: The cingulo-opercular and fronto-parietal networks (FPNs) control cognitive functions and processes.The frontoparietal network is a fast intuitive system that utilizes short-time attention which is compatible with type 1 processing. In contrast, the cingulo-opercular network (CON) is an analytical time-consuming system that utilizes attention and working memory for a longer time, compatible with type 2 processing.The default-interventionist model of a dual-process theory states that our behaviors are controlled by type 1 processing unless we are confronted with novel and complex problems in which we have no prior experiences.

Plain language summary: The present study examined the activity of two task-based brain networks through performing diffrent type of reasoning tasks. Fronto-parietal and Cingulo-opercular are the two task-based brain networks that are responsible for cognitive control. These two brain networks direct the way to use cognitive skills and executive functions which are necessary to perform cognitive tasks especially higher-order ones as reasoning tasks. Since the two types of inductive and deductive reasoning tasks requier two different bottom-up and top-down cognitive control respectively, different cognitive skills would be needed which affect the activity of fronto-parietal and cingulo-opercular brain networks. Our results showed that through inductive reasoning task which examined by RAVEN, both of the fronto-parietal and cingulo-opercular brain networks were activated but deductive reasoning task which examined by Wason Selection Card test, just the fronto-parietal brain network was activated. It seems that in the case of deductive reasoninf task, there is a higher probability of errors which lead to giving less correct responses. Based on our results, subjects paid not enough attention to details, so had failure to update informations that leaded to responding with errors. Inactivity of cingulo-opercular network through dedeuctive reasoning task clearly showed that the bottom-up cognitive control did not happen successfully. As a result of that, information processing did not proceed properly.

演绎和归纳推理的脑网络基础:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
简介:额顶叶(FPN)和扣谷-眼网络(CON)通过不同的功能框架控制演绎推理和归纳推理所需的认知功能。FPN是一个快速的直觉系统,而CON是一个缓慢的分析系统。默认干预主义模型提出了直观和分析认知系统之间相互作用的一系列观点。本研究旨在从默认干预主义模型的角度,通过推理检验FPN和CON的活动模式。方法:采用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)对24名健康大学生在进行Raven和Wason推理任务时的扣谷-眼和额顶叶网络活动进行观察。由于CON和FPN的操作时间不同,因此将反应时间作为行为因素进行评估。结果:在Raven’s advanced progressive matrices (RAPM)试验中,CON和FPN均被激活。同时,随着Raven测试难度的增加,反应时间呈线性增加。相比之下,在沃森选择任务(WST)测试中,只观察到FPN的活性。结论:本研究结果支持双过程理论的默认干预主义模型对推理认知机制的准确解释。因此,反应方法(直觉/分析)决定了哪些认知技能和大脑区域参与了反应。重点:扣谷-眼和额顶叶网络(FPNs)控制认知功能和过程。额顶叶网络是一个快速的直觉系统,它利用短时间注意力,与1型加工相兼容。相比之下,cingulo-opercular network (CON)是一个耗时的分析系统,它利用注意力和工作记忆的时间更长,与2型加工相兼容。双过程理论的默认干预主义模型指出,除非我们面临新的和复杂的问题,我们没有之前的经验,否则我们的行为是由1型加工控制的。摘要:本研究通过执行不同类型的推理任务,检测了两个基于任务的大脑网络的活动。额顶叶和cingulo - operular是负责认知控制的两个基于任务的大脑网络。这两个大脑网络指导着认知技能和执行功能的使用,这是执行认知任务,尤其是高阶推理任务所必需的。由于归纳推理和演绎推理任务分别需要自下而上和自上而下两种不同的认知控制,因此需要不同的认知技能来影响大脑额顶叶和扣眼网络的活动。结果表明,在RAVEN测试的归纳推理任务中,大脑的额顶叶网络和扣谷眼网络都被激活,而在Wason选择卡测试的演绎推理任务中,大脑的额顶叶网络被激活。似乎在演绎推理任务中,出错的可能性更高,从而导致给出的正确答案更少。根据我们的研究结果,受试者对细节的关注不够,因此无法更新信息,从而导致错误的回答。在演绎推理任务中,扣眼网络不活跃清楚地表明自下而上的认知控制没有成功发生。因此,信息处理不能正常进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Survey Review
Survey Review 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Survey Review is an international journal that has been published since 1931, until recently under the auspices of the Commonwealth Association of Surveying and Land Economy (CASLE). The journal is now published for Survey Review Ltd and brings together research, theory and practice of positioning and measurement, engineering surveying, cadastre and land management, and spatial information management. All papers are peer reviewed and are drawn from an international community, including government, private industry and academia. Survey Review is invaluable to practitioners, academics, researchers and students who are anxious to maintain their currency of knowledge in a rapidly developing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信