Prevalence of Refractive Errors Among Saudi Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 0.6
Majid Moafa
{"title":"Prevalence of Refractive Errors Among Saudi Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Majid Moafa","doi":"10.5455/jcmr.2023.14.03.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Refractive errors are common globally with an estimated number of 2.3 billion people suffering from impaired vision secondary to uncorrected refractive errors. This study aimed to estimate a piece of proper evidence about the overall prevalenceof refractory errors within the kingdom. Methods: A process of collection of relevant key words was conducted followed by database search. All data were analyzed with R software version 4.0.2. Using a “meta” package. The event rate and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the prevalence of refractive errors in the study. Results: The sample size was 16850 individual with the highest sample size was 5176 and the lowest one was 162. The male prevalence in our sample was 55%. All the included papers were published after 2010 and were of fair quality. Eleven studies of 12,121 individuals reported the overall prevalence of different refrative erros. The pooled overall prevalnce rate was 27.28% (95% CI= 18.29-40.69) (Figure 2A); ranging from 4.55% to 72.20% among individual studies. This wide range of the reported prevalence rates was evident with a significant heterogenity among the included studies (I2= 99%; P-value< 0.001). Conclusion: A huge part of the high rates might be attributable to medical students. Moreover, myopia was the most common refractive error followed by astigmatism and hyperopia.","PeriodicalId":41505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Complementary Medicine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Complementary Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcmr.2023.14.03.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Refractive errors are common globally with an estimated number of 2.3 billion people suffering from impaired vision secondary to uncorrected refractive errors. This study aimed to estimate a piece of proper evidence about the overall prevalenceof refractory errors within the kingdom. Methods: A process of collection of relevant key words was conducted followed by database search. All data were analyzed with R software version 4.0.2. Using a “meta” package. The event rate and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the prevalence of refractive errors in the study. Results: The sample size was 16850 individual with the highest sample size was 5176 and the lowest one was 162. The male prevalence in our sample was 55%. All the included papers were published after 2010 and were of fair quality. Eleven studies of 12,121 individuals reported the overall prevalence of different refrative erros. The pooled overall prevalnce rate was 27.28% (95% CI= 18.29-40.69) (Figure 2A); ranging from 4.55% to 72.20% among individual studies. This wide range of the reported prevalence rates was evident with a significant heterogenity among the included studies (I2= 99%; P-value< 0.001). Conclusion: A huge part of the high rates might be attributable to medical students. Moreover, myopia was the most common refractive error followed by astigmatism and hyperopia.
沙特人口屈光不正患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:屈光不正在全球很常见,估计有23亿人因未矫正的屈光不正而继发视力受损。这项研究的目的是估计一个适当的证据,在王国的顽固性错误的总体患病率。方法:先收集相关关键词,然后进行数据库检索。所有数据采用R软件4.0.2版进行分析。使用“meta”包。使用事件率和相应的95%置信区间(CI)来评估研究中屈光不正的发生率。结果:样本量为16850人,最大样本量为5176人,最小样本量为162人。我们样本中的男性患病率为55%。收录的论文均为2010年以后发表的论文,质量一般。11项涉及12121人的研究报告了不同屈光不正的总体患病率。合并总患病率为27.28% (95% CI= 18.29-40.69)(图2A);在个别研究中从4.55%到72.20%不等。报告的患病率范围如此之广,在纳入的研究中存在显著的异质性(I2= 99%;假定值< 0.001)。结论:医学生可能是造成高发生率的主要原因。此外,近视是最常见的屈光不正,其次是散光和远视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology (2146-8397) Between (2012 Volume 1, Issue 1 - 2018 Volume 7, Issue 1). Journal of Complementary Medicine Research is aimed to serve a contemporary approach to the knowledge about world-wide usage of complementary medicine and their empirical and evidence-based effects. ISSN: 2577-5669
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信