Class, Culture, and Conflict in the Edwardian Book Inscription: A Multimodal Ethnohistorical Approach

L. O’Hagan
{"title":"Class, Culture, and Conflict in the Edwardian Book Inscription: A Multimodal Ethnohistorical Approach","authors":"L. O’Hagan","doi":"10.1515/9783110608694-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study draws on theories and methodologies from the fields of multimodality, ethnography and book history studies to explore class conflict and social mobility in Edwardian Britain (1901-1914). Using a dataset of 2,998 book inscriptions, this work investigates the types of inscriptions present in books bought and exchanged in Edwardian Britain; the ways in which inscriptive practices varied according to location, gender, age, social class and occupation; the material and semiotic features of inscriptions; and their communicative and performative purposes. The findings reveal that inscriptive choices were primarily influenced by ‘class-based affordances’ that centred on the social status and wealth of book owners, as well as Edwardian social conventions and the specific, well-established norms of each inscription genre or sub-genre. For the working classes, inscriptions represented pride at owning a book for the first time, while the lower-middle classes primarily used inscriptions as symbolic gestures of social mobility to gain social capital and respect from peers. In contrast, the upper classes, who feared the collapse of hierarchical society, saw inscriptions as a way of advertising their wealth and high social status. However, there is some indication that the upper-middle classes were slightly more willing to embrace lower-class inscriptive practices. These findings suggest that we must reframe current conceptions of hegemony as the transmission of values from a dominant social group to a subordinate one, and view it, instead, as a continuous two-way process between different groups. Overall, the study demonstrates how blending multimodal analysis with ethnohistorical methodologies can uncover the important role of the inscription as a material microcosm of the social tensions that existed between class groups in early twentieth-century Britain.","PeriodicalId":92511,"journal":{"name":"Experimental IR meets multilinguality, multimodality, and interaction : 8th International Conference of the CLEF Association, CLEF 2017, Dublin, Ireland, September 11-14, 2017, Proceedings. Cross-Language Evaluation Forum. Conference","volume":"64 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental IR meets multilinguality, multimodality, and interaction : 8th International Conference of the CLEF Association, CLEF 2017, Dublin, Ireland, September 11-14, 2017, Proceedings. Cross-Language Evaluation Forum. Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110608694-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study draws on theories and methodologies from the fields of multimodality, ethnography and book history studies to explore class conflict and social mobility in Edwardian Britain (1901-1914). Using a dataset of 2,998 book inscriptions, this work investigates the types of inscriptions present in books bought and exchanged in Edwardian Britain; the ways in which inscriptive practices varied according to location, gender, age, social class and occupation; the material and semiotic features of inscriptions; and their communicative and performative purposes. The findings reveal that inscriptive choices were primarily influenced by ‘class-based affordances’ that centred on the social status and wealth of book owners, as well as Edwardian social conventions and the specific, well-established norms of each inscription genre or sub-genre. For the working classes, inscriptions represented pride at owning a book for the first time, while the lower-middle classes primarily used inscriptions as symbolic gestures of social mobility to gain social capital and respect from peers. In contrast, the upper classes, who feared the collapse of hierarchical society, saw inscriptions as a way of advertising their wealth and high social status. However, there is some indication that the upper-middle classes were slightly more willing to embrace lower-class inscriptive practices. These findings suggest that we must reframe current conceptions of hegemony as the transmission of values from a dominant social group to a subordinate one, and view it, instead, as a continuous two-way process between different groups. Overall, the study demonstrates how blending multimodal analysis with ethnohistorical methodologies can uncover the important role of the inscription as a material microcosm of the social tensions that existed between class groups in early twentieth-century Britain.
爱德华时代铭文中的阶级、文化与冲突:一种多模态的民族历史研究方法
本研究借鉴了多模态、民族志和书史研究领域的理论和方法,探讨了爱德华七世时期英国(1901-1914)的阶级冲突和社会流动。使用2998个书籍铭文的数据集,这项工作调查了在爱德华七世时期的英国购买和交换的书籍中出现的铭文类型;铭文实践的方式因地点、性别、年龄、社会阶层和职业而异;铭文的物质特征和符号学特征以及它们的交际和表演目的。研究结果表明,碑文的选择主要受到“基于阶级的支持”的影响,这种支持主要集中在图书所有者的社会地位和财富,以及爱德华七世时代的社会习俗,以及每种碑文类型或子类型的具体、完善的规范。对于工人阶级来说,碑文代表着第一次拥有一本书的骄傲,而中下层阶级则主要把碑文作为社会流动性的象征,以获得社会资本和同龄人的尊重。相比之下,担心等级社会崩溃的上层阶级将碑文视为宣传其财富和高社会地位的一种方式。然而,有一些迹象表明,中上层阶级更愿意接受下层阶级的铭文做法。这些发现表明,我们必须重新定义当前的霸权概念,将其视为价值观从占主导地位的社会群体向从属群体的传递,而不是将其视为不同群体之间持续的双向过程。总体而言,该研究表明,将多模态分析与民族历史方法相结合,可以揭示铭文作为20世纪初英国阶级群体之间存在的社会紧张关系的物质缩影的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书