Vijay B. Thapa, Anand K. Gramopadhye, Brian Melloy, Larry Grimes
{"title":"Evaluation of different training strategies to improve decision-making performance in inspection","authors":"Vijay B. Thapa, Anand K. Gramopadhye, Brian Melloy, Larry Grimes","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7111(199622)6:3<243::AID-HFM4>3.0.CO;2-A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Various studies in inspection have demonstrated the usefulness of feedforward (FF) and feedback (FB) in improving the performance of inspectors. However, the results of these studies are not conclusive as to their effect on the sensitivity and response strategy of inspectors. Hence, this study evaluates the individual and collective effect of FF and FB on the sensitivity and response strategy of the inspectors using a computer simulation of a contact lens inspection task. Twenty-four subjects, randomly assigned to various conditions, performed an inspection task wherein the FF and FB conditions were manipulated between the subjects. In addition, the defect probability and the discriminability were manipulated within the subjects. Subsequently, the results were interpreted using signal detection theory. Although feedback improved the sensitivity, a finding consistent with earlier studies, feedforward was more effective in assisting the inspectors in setting their response strategy closer to the optimum. Moreover, providing both FF and FB resulted in improved sensitivity as well as a more optimal response strategy. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":100698,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing","volume":"6 3","pages":"243-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7111(199622)6:3<243::AID-HFM4>3.0.CO;2-A","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291522-7111%28199622%296%3A3%3C243%3A%3AAID-HFM4%3E3.0.CO%3B2-A","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33
Abstract
Various studies in inspection have demonstrated the usefulness of feedforward (FF) and feedback (FB) in improving the performance of inspectors. However, the results of these studies are not conclusive as to their effect on the sensitivity and response strategy of inspectors. Hence, this study evaluates the individual and collective effect of FF and FB on the sensitivity and response strategy of the inspectors using a computer simulation of a contact lens inspection task. Twenty-four subjects, randomly assigned to various conditions, performed an inspection task wherein the FF and FB conditions were manipulated between the subjects. In addition, the defect probability and the discriminability were manipulated within the subjects. Subsequently, the results were interpreted using signal detection theory. Although feedback improved the sensitivity, a finding consistent with earlier studies, feedforward was more effective in assisting the inspectors in setting their response strategy closer to the optimum. Moreover, providing both FF and FB resulted in improved sensitivity as well as a more optimal response strategy. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
评价不同的培训策略以提高检验决策绩效
各种检查研究已经证明了前馈(FF)和反馈(FB)在提高检查员绩效方面的有用性。然而,这些研究的结果并不是结论性的影响敏感性和反应策略的检查员。因此,本研究通过计算机模拟隐形眼镜检查任务,评估了FF和FB对检查员灵敏度和反应策略的个人和集体影响。24名受试者被随机分配到不同的条件下,执行一项检查任务,其中FF和FB条件在受试者之间被操纵。此外,在被试内部对缺陷概率和可判别性进行了操纵。随后,利用信号检测理论对结果进行了解释。虽然反馈提高了灵敏度,这一发现与早期的研究一致,但前馈在帮助检查员制定更接近最佳的反应策略方面更有效。此外,同时提供FF和FB可提高灵敏度以及更优的响应策略。©1996 John Wiley &儿子,Inc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。