Conservative Management of Residual Pneumothorax Following Tube Thoracostomy Removal in Trauma Patients

{"title":"Conservative Management of Residual Pneumothorax Following Tube Thoracostomy Removal in Trauma Patients","authors":"","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ab s t r Ac t Introduction: Residual pneumothorax (rPTX) after tube thoracostomy (TT) is not an uncommon occurrence (10–20%) in any active trauma center. Many different practice patterns exist on how to deal with this clinical conundrum. These differing strategies can include more invasive procedures and increased length of stay (LOS). We hypothesize that the vast majority of these patients can be safely managed with observation and most can be discharged home without complete resolution. Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on trauma patients managed in a level I center over a 2-year period. A “post-pull” chest X-ray was obtained on all TT patients after removal. All patient with rPTX were included for analysis. Results: A total of 412 patients required chest tubes. Since 98 patients were deceased, we excluded them from the study. A total of 314 patients were studied. Forty-two percent of the patients were male, with median age 40. Sixty-one percent of the patients were blunt trauma victims and 39% were penetrating trauma victims. The indications for chest TT were pneumothorax, hemothorax, and hemopneumothorax. A total of 163 had post-pull pneumo and discharged home with residual pathology prior to discharge. Five of these patients were readmitted (3%), and only one required repeat TT, roughly 0.6%. Conclusion: The vast majority of “post-pull” rPTX patients can be managed conservatively and can be safely discharged even without complete resolution.","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ab s t r Ac t Introduction: Residual pneumothorax (rPTX) after tube thoracostomy (TT) is not an uncommon occurrence (10–20%) in any active trauma center. Many different practice patterns exist on how to deal with this clinical conundrum. These differing strategies can include more invasive procedures and increased length of stay (LOS). We hypothesize that the vast majority of these patients can be safely managed with observation and most can be discharged home without complete resolution. Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on trauma patients managed in a level I center over a 2-year period. A “post-pull” chest X-ray was obtained on all TT patients after removal. All patient with rPTX were included for analysis. Results: A total of 412 patients required chest tubes. Since 98 patients were deceased, we excluded them from the study. A total of 314 patients were studied. Forty-two percent of the patients were male, with median age 40. Sixty-one percent of the patients were blunt trauma victims and 39% were penetrating trauma victims. The indications for chest TT were pneumothorax, hemothorax, and hemopneumothorax. A total of 163 had post-pull pneumo and discharged home with residual pathology prior to discharge. Five of these patients were readmitted (3%), and only one required repeat TT, roughly 0.6%. Conclusion: The vast majority of “post-pull” rPTX patients can be managed conservatively and can be safely discharged even without complete resolution.
创伤患者开胸管切除术后残余气胸的保守治疗
导读:在任何外伤中心,管式开胸术(TT)后残余气胸(rPTX)并不罕见(10-20%)。关于如何处理这一临床难题,存在许多不同的实践模式。这些不同的策略包括更具侵入性的手术和延长住院时间(LOS)。我们假设绝大多数患者可以通过观察进行安全管理,大多数患者可以在没有完全解决的情况下出院回家。材料与方法:对在某一级医疗中心治疗2年的创伤患者进行回顾性研究。所有TT患者拔除后均行“拔后”胸片检查。所有rPTX患者纳入分析。结果:共412例患者需要胸管。由于98例患者已死亡,我们将其排除在研究之外。共研究了314例患者。42%的患者是男性,平均年龄为40岁。61%的患者为钝性创伤,39%为穿透性创伤。胸部TT的适应症为气胸、血胸、血气胸。共有163名患者有拔肺后肺炎,出院前病理残留。其中5名患者再次入院(3%),只有1名患者需要重复TT治疗,约占0.6%。结论:绝大多数“拔术后”rPTX患者可以保守治疗,即使没有完全治愈也可以安全出院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信