Interrelation Among COVID-19 Situation, Evaluation of Government Actions and Subjective Well-being in Lithuania

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Dainius Genys, R. Krikštolaitis
{"title":"Interrelation Among COVID-19 Situation, Evaluation of Government Actions and Subjective Well-being in Lithuania","authors":"Dainius Genys, R. Krikštolaitis","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.v32i4.4617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The huge and sudden challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic created the need for quick governmental decisions, at the same time provoking changes in subjective public perception. The article empirically analyses the attitudes of different groups in Lithuania towards the COVID-19 situation, government actions and changes in subjective personal well-being. A representative public opinion poll (N-804) was conducted to achieve this goal. Empirical research sought to elucidate individual self-protection measures, attitudes towards the danger of the virus, government-implemented measures to combat the pandemic, and common stereotypes as well as consequences for subjective well-being. The cluster analysis confirmed the assumption that there is a link between the perception of the role of society and expectations towards the government, and between the dynamics of trust in key political actors and support for specific government actions in the context of a pandemic. If the group is more self-reliant, government policies that regulate even small aspects of public life lead to disagreement (in the case of 1st cluster), and vice versa, if the group has high expectations of government, it receives support (in the case of 3rd cluster).","PeriodicalId":43648,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija-Sociologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofija-Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v32i4.4617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The huge and sudden challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic created the need for quick governmental decisions, at the same time provoking changes in subjective public perception. The article empirically analyses the attitudes of different groups in Lithuania towards the COVID-19 situation, government actions and changes in subjective personal well-being. A representative public opinion poll (N-804) was conducted to achieve this goal. Empirical research sought to elucidate individual self-protection measures, attitudes towards the danger of the virus, government-implemented measures to combat the pandemic, and common stereotypes as well as consequences for subjective well-being. The cluster analysis confirmed the assumption that there is a link between the perception of the role of society and expectations towards the government, and between the dynamics of trust in key political actors and support for specific government actions in the context of a pandemic. If the group is more self-reliant, government policies that regulate even small aspects of public life lead to disagreement (in the case of 1st cluster), and vice versa, if the group has high expectations of government, it receives support (in the case of 3rd cluster).
立陶宛疫情形势、政府行为评价与主观幸福感的相互关系
COVID-19大流行带来的巨大而突然的挑战需要政府迅速做出决策,同时也引发了公众主观认知的变化。本文实证分析了立陶宛不同群体对新冠疫情的态度、政府行为和主观幸福感的变化。为了实现这一目标,进行了一次有代表性的民意调查(N-804)。实证研究试图阐明个人的自我保护措施、对病毒危险的态度、政府实施的防治大流行病的措施、普遍的陈规定型观念以及对主观幸福感的影响。聚类分析证实了这样一种假设,即对社会作用的看法与对政府的期望之间存在联系,在大流行背景下,对主要政治行为者的信任动态与对政府具体行动的支持之间存在联系。如果这个群体更加自力更生,那么政府对公共生活哪怕是很小方面的政策也会导致分歧(在第一个集群的情况下),反之亦然,如果这个群体对政府有很高的期望,它就会得到支持(在第三个集群的情况下)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信