Efficacy of Inspiratory Muscle Training on Respiratory Muscle Strength in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Larissa Melo Sampaio, H. Fuzari
{"title":"Efficacy of Inspiratory Muscle Training on Respiratory Muscle Strength in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Larissa Melo Sampaio, H. Fuzari","doi":"10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate whether inspiratory muscle training improves respiratory muscle strength and function and reduces dyspnea and fatigue in hematopoietic stem cell recipients. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Participants: People with hematological neoplasms who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Intervention: Inspiratory muscle training with POWER breath Plus, POWERbreathe, Classic, and Threshold devices, with a load of 40% of the maximum inspiratory pressure. Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes were maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and the FEV1/FVC ratio. Secondary outcomes were dyspnea, fatigue, respiratory rate, peripheral O2 saturation, quality of life, and functional capacity. Results: The search identified 3 eligible studies with a sample of 108 participants. Maximal inspiratory pressure was higher in the intervention group in the 3 studies reviewed, with an average difference of −9.3 cm H2O, −31.94 cm H2O, and −16 cm H2O in relation to the control group after inspiratory muscle training. One study found an improvement in the distance covered in the 6-minute walk test (34.22 m) and in the distance covered in the modified incremental shuttle walking test (66.43 m) in the intervention group. Limitation: This systematic review includes only 3 randomized controlled clinical trials. Conclusion: Inspiratory muscle training is effective in increasing inspiratory muscle strength and functional capacity in bone marrow transplant recipients. However, its effects on fatigue and dyspnea remain uncertain.","PeriodicalId":54153,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Oncology","volume":"9 1","pages":"96 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether inspiratory muscle training improves respiratory muscle strength and function and reduces dyspnea and fatigue in hematopoietic stem cell recipients. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Participants: People with hematological neoplasms who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Intervention: Inspiratory muscle training with POWER breath Plus, POWERbreathe, Classic, and Threshold devices, with a load of 40% of the maximum inspiratory pressure. Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes were maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and the FEV1/FVC ratio. Secondary outcomes were dyspnea, fatigue, respiratory rate, peripheral O2 saturation, quality of life, and functional capacity. Results: The search identified 3 eligible studies with a sample of 108 participants. Maximal inspiratory pressure was higher in the intervention group in the 3 studies reviewed, with an average difference of −9.3 cm H2O, −31.94 cm H2O, and −16 cm H2O in relation to the control group after inspiratory muscle training. One study found an improvement in the distance covered in the 6-minute walk test (34.22 m) and in the distance covered in the modified incremental shuttle walking test (66.43 m) in the intervention group. Limitation: This systematic review includes only 3 randomized controlled clinical trials. Conclusion: Inspiratory muscle training is effective in increasing inspiratory muscle strength and functional capacity in bone marrow transplant recipients. However, its effects on fatigue and dyspnea remain uncertain.
吸气肌训练对造血干细胞受者呼吸肌力量的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:探讨吸气肌训练是否能改善造血干细胞受者的呼吸肌力量和功能,减轻呼吸困难和疲劳。设计:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。参与者:接受造血干细胞移植的血液肿瘤患者。干预:使用POWERbreath Plus、POWERbreathe、Classic和Threshold设备进行吸气肌训练,负荷为最大吸气压力的40%。结果指标:主要结果为最大吸气压力、最大呼气压力、呼气第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)和FEV1/FVC比值。次要结局为呼吸困难、疲劳、呼吸频率、外周氧饱和度、生活质量和功能能力。结果:搜索确定了3个符合条件的研究,样本为108名参与者。在回顾的3项研究中,干预组的最大吸气压力较高,与对照组相比,吸气肌训练后的最大吸气压力平均差值分别为- 9.3 cm H2O、- 31.94 cm H2O和- 16 cm H2O。一项研究发现,干预组在6分钟步行测试中行走距离(34.22米)和改进的增量穿梭行走测试中行走距离(66.43米)有所改善。局限性:本系统综述仅包括3个随机对照临床试验。结论:吸气肌训练能有效提高骨髓移植受者的吸气肌力量和功能。然而,其对疲劳和呼吸困难的影响仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信