“What a Splendid World We Ruined”: the Precarious Presents and Posthuman Futures of Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and Dmitry Glukhovsky’s Metro 2033

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE
Marta Korbel
{"title":"“What a Splendid World We Ruined”: the Precarious Presents and Posthuman Futures of Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and Dmitry Glukhovsky’s Metro 2033","authors":"Marta Korbel","doi":"10.5007/2175-8026.2023.e92223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Speculative fiction is a particularly relevant genre at the moment when, apart from the troubling global impact of late-modern phenomena, the ongoing pandemic and the 2022 Russo-Ukrainian War have raised universal concern. This paper conducts a comparative analysis of two novels which describe a postapocalyptic world after a deadly plague and a nuclear conflict, respectively: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake (2004 [2003]) and Dmitry Glukhovsky’s Metro 2033 (2010 [2005]). It approaches the texts as critiques of late-modern neoliberal capitalism, employing the theory by Zygmunt Bauman, Ulrich Beck and Mark Fisher. Additionally, it scrutinises the representation of the neoliberal subject in Atwood’s book and utilises Svetlana Boym’s reflection on nostalgia in post-Soviet Russia to comment on Glukhovsky’s work. Lastly, it examines the posthuman alternative the two authors present for the deeply flawed human social orders.","PeriodicalId":43226,"journal":{"name":"Ilha do Desterro-A Journal of English Language Literatures in English and Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilha do Desterro-A Journal of English Language Literatures in English and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2023.e92223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Speculative fiction is a particularly relevant genre at the moment when, apart from the troubling global impact of late-modern phenomena, the ongoing pandemic and the 2022 Russo-Ukrainian War have raised universal concern. This paper conducts a comparative analysis of two novels which describe a postapocalyptic world after a deadly plague and a nuclear conflict, respectively: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake (2004 [2003]) and Dmitry Glukhovsky’s Metro 2033 (2010 [2005]). It approaches the texts as critiques of late-modern neoliberal capitalism, employing the theory by Zygmunt Bauman, Ulrich Beck and Mark Fisher. Additionally, it scrutinises the representation of the neoliberal subject in Atwood’s book and utilises Svetlana Boym’s reflection on nostalgia in post-Soviet Russia to comment on Glukhovsky’s work. Lastly, it examines the posthuman alternative the two authors present for the deeply flawed human social orders.
“我们毁掉了一个多么美好的世界”:玛格丽特·阿特伍德的《羚羊与秧鸡》和德米特里·格鲁克霍夫斯基的《地铁2033》不稳定的现在和后人类的未来
除了近代现象令人不安的全球影响外,目前的大流行和2022年俄乌战争也引起了普遍关注,因此,投机小说是一种特别相关的类型。本文对玛格丽特·阿特伍德的《羚羊与秧鸡》(2004[2003])和德米特里·格鲁克霍夫斯基的《地铁2033》(2010[2005])这两部描述致命瘟疫和核冲突后世界末日的小说进行了比较分析。它采用齐格蒙特·鲍曼(Zygmunt Bauman)、乌尔里希·贝克(Ulrich Beck)和马克·费舍尔(Mark Fisher)的理论,将这些文本作为对现代新自由主义资本主义的批评。此外,本文还审视了阿特伍德书中新自由主义主题的表现,并利用斯维特拉娜·博伊姆对后苏联时期俄罗斯怀旧情绪的反思来评论格卢霍夫斯基的作品。最后,它考察了两位作者为存在严重缺陷的人类社会秩序提出的后人类替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信