Perinatal Outcome in Newborns of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

B. Baysal, O. Oner
{"title":"Perinatal Outcome in Newborns of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus","authors":"B. Baysal, O. Oner","doi":"10.33425/2639-9342.1155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was planned to determine the perinatal outcomes of the newborns of term pregnant women who were diagnosed with GDM and decided to have cesarean delivery. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five pregnant patients diagnosed with GDM were included in the study. The control group consisted of 35 patients who did not have any pregnancy-related disease and were decided to deliver with elective cesarean section. All participants were screened with a 50-g GCT at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Pregnant women with meeting the following laboratory criteria were accepted as GDM. If the serum glucose level was greater than 140 mg/dL on the 50-g GCT, a 100-g OGTT was applied. Diagnosis of GDM was confirmed if 2 of the blood glucose test results were above the following levels: fasting serum glucose ≥ 92 mg/dL and/or 1-hour glycemia ≥ 180 mg/dL, and/or 2-hour glycemia ≥ 153 mg/dL. Perinatal outcome between GDM subjects and control group was compared. All participants in GDM and control groups underwent cesarean deivery. Primary outcome measures included gestational birthweight, gestational age at delivery, stillbirth and neonatal death, minor and major birth defects. Results: While neonatal hypoglycemia was detected in 4 cases in the GDM group, it was found in one case in the control group. No stilbirth was detected in either the GDM group or the control group. While neonatal death was detected in one case in the GDM group, no neonatal death was observed in the control group. While mild preeclampsia was detected in one case in the GDM group, it was not found in the control group. Birth weeks and birth weights of the cases in both groups were recorded similarly. While 8 babies of 2500 grams or less were born in GDM cases, all of the cases in the control group were over 2500 grams. While prematurity was detected in two babies in the GDM group, no prematurity was reported in the control group. Neonatal intensive care needs were seen in three babies in the GDM group, and there were no infants in need of intensive care in the control group. Conclusions: There is a slight increase in low birth weight, prematurity and intensive care unit needs of babies born to mothers with GDM.","PeriodicalId":12828,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology & reproductive health","volume":"99 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology & reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9342.1155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was planned to determine the perinatal outcomes of the newborns of term pregnant women who were diagnosed with GDM and decided to have cesarean delivery. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five pregnant patients diagnosed with GDM were included in the study. The control group consisted of 35 patients who did not have any pregnancy-related disease and were decided to deliver with elective cesarean section. All participants were screened with a 50-g GCT at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Pregnant women with meeting the following laboratory criteria were accepted as GDM. If the serum glucose level was greater than 140 mg/dL on the 50-g GCT, a 100-g OGTT was applied. Diagnosis of GDM was confirmed if 2 of the blood glucose test results were above the following levels: fasting serum glucose ≥ 92 mg/dL and/or 1-hour glycemia ≥ 180 mg/dL, and/or 2-hour glycemia ≥ 153 mg/dL. Perinatal outcome between GDM subjects and control group was compared. All participants in GDM and control groups underwent cesarean deivery. Primary outcome measures included gestational birthweight, gestational age at delivery, stillbirth and neonatal death, minor and major birth defects. Results: While neonatal hypoglycemia was detected in 4 cases in the GDM group, it was found in one case in the control group. No stilbirth was detected in either the GDM group or the control group. While neonatal death was detected in one case in the GDM group, no neonatal death was observed in the control group. While mild preeclampsia was detected in one case in the GDM group, it was not found in the control group. Birth weeks and birth weights of the cases in both groups were recorded similarly. While 8 babies of 2500 grams or less were born in GDM cases, all of the cases in the control group were over 2500 grams. While prematurity was detected in two babies in the GDM group, no prematurity was reported in the control group. Neonatal intensive care needs were seen in three babies in the GDM group, and there were no infants in need of intensive care in the control group. Conclusions: There is a slight increase in low birth weight, prematurity and intensive care unit needs of babies born to mothers with GDM.
妊娠期糖尿病患者新生儿围产儿结局分析
目的:本研究旨在了解诊断为GDM并决定剖宫产的足月孕妇的新生儿围产儿结局。材料与方法:纳入35例确诊为GDM的孕妇。对照组为35例无妊娠相关疾病且决定择期剖宫产的患者。所有参与者在妊娠24-28周时接受50g GCT筛查。符合以下实验室标准的孕妇被认为是GDM。如果在50g GCT上血清葡萄糖水平大于140mg /dL,则应用100g OGTT。如果血糖测试结果中有2项高于以下水平,则诊断为GDM:空腹血糖≥92 mg/dL和/或1小时血糖≥180 mg/dL,和/或2小时血糖≥153 mg/dL。比较GDM组与对照组围产儿结局。GDM组和对照组的所有参与者均行剖宫产。主要结局指标包括出生体重、分娩胎龄、死胎和新生儿死亡、轻微和严重出生缺陷。结果:GDM组出现新生儿低血糖4例,对照组1例。GDM组和对照组均未发现死产。GDM组中有1例新生儿死亡,对照组中未见新生儿死亡。GDM组中有1例出现轻度子痫前期,而对照组中未发现。两组病例的出生周数和出生体重记录相似。GDM病例中有8名婴儿体重在2500克以下,而对照组的婴儿体重都在2500克以上。GDM组中有两名婴儿出现早产,而对照组中没有早产儿的报道。GDM组有3例新生儿需要重症监护,对照组无新生儿需要重症监护。结论:GDM母亲所生婴儿的低出生体重、早产和重症监护病房需求略有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信