R. E. Lakhin, E. A. Zhirnova, A. Shchegolev, I. Zheleznyak, I. Menkov, A. A. Chugunov
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided lung lesion index as a predictor of treatment outcomes: cohort study of 388 patients with coronavirus infection","authors":"R. E. Lakhin, E. A. Zhirnova, A. Shchegolev, I. Zheleznyak, I. Menkov, A. A. Chugunov","doi":"10.21320/1818-474x-2022-3-45-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION. Currently there are a lot of articles of lung ultrasound (LUS) in COVID-19 both in the diagnosis and in the prognosis of the disease. OBJECTIVE. Evaluation of the relationship between the ultrasound-guided lung lesion index (UIL) with the volume of lung involvement determined by computed tomography (CT) and disease outcomes in patients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A prospective observational cohort clinical study included 388 patients aged 18-75 years; diagnosed with pneumonia with COVID-19 or suspected COVID-19. Lung ultrasound was performed according to the 16-zone “Russian Protocol” within 24 hours after CT scan of the chest organs. RESULTS. The median lung lesion volume on CT was 55 (35-74) % and UIL was 46 (28-60) points. UIL had a strong direct correlation of 0.873 (95 % CI 0.842-0.897, p < 0.01) with the change in the volume of lung involvement determined by CT and the inverse with the SpO2/FiO2 index - 0.850 (95 % CI 0.827-0.871, p < 0.01). Mortality was 56 patients (14.4 %) (p = 0.018). The optimal cut-off point for ROC analysis in predicting mortality was 55 points and had a sensitivity of 97.6 % and a specificity of 73.9 % with an area under the curve of 0.896 (95 % CI 0.861-0.931). Kaplan- Meier analysis on the entire data set (n = 388) demonstrated a survival rate of 97.6 % in the group with a UIL score less than 55 points and 62 % in the group with a UIL score more than 55 points. Differences between groups were statistically significant (Log Rank test p < 0.001; Breslow test p < 0.001). As a result, multivariate Cox regression analysis, using the stepwise exclusion method, only UIL remained a significant predictor of adverse outcome (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS. UIL determined by 16-zone “Russian protocol” correlated with severity of respiratory failure and volume of lung injury and was a predictor of adverse prognosis of disease outcome.","PeriodicalId":93261,"journal":{"name":"Annals of pulmonary and critical care medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of pulmonary and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474x-2022-3-45-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. Currently there are a lot of articles of lung ultrasound (LUS) in COVID-19 both in the diagnosis and in the prognosis of the disease. OBJECTIVE. Evaluation of the relationship between the ultrasound-guided lung lesion index (UIL) with the volume of lung involvement determined by computed tomography (CT) and disease outcomes in patients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A prospective observational cohort clinical study included 388 patients aged 18-75 years; diagnosed with pneumonia with COVID-19 or suspected COVID-19. Lung ultrasound was performed according to the 16-zone “Russian Protocol” within 24 hours after CT scan of the chest organs. RESULTS. The median lung lesion volume on CT was 55 (35-74) % and UIL was 46 (28-60) points. UIL had a strong direct correlation of 0.873 (95 % CI 0.842-0.897, p < 0.01) with the change in the volume of lung involvement determined by CT and the inverse with the SpO2/FiO2 index - 0.850 (95 % CI 0.827-0.871, p < 0.01). Mortality was 56 patients (14.4 %) (p = 0.018). The optimal cut-off point for ROC analysis in predicting mortality was 55 points and had a sensitivity of 97.6 % and a specificity of 73.9 % with an area under the curve of 0.896 (95 % CI 0.861-0.931). Kaplan- Meier analysis on the entire data set (n = 388) demonstrated a survival rate of 97.6 % in the group with a UIL score less than 55 points and 62 % in the group with a UIL score more than 55 points. Differences between groups were statistically significant (Log Rank test p < 0.001; Breslow test p < 0.001). As a result, multivariate Cox regression analysis, using the stepwise exclusion method, only UIL remained a significant predictor of adverse outcome (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS. UIL determined by 16-zone “Russian protocol” correlated with severity of respiratory failure and volume of lung injury and was a predictor of adverse prognosis of disease outcome.