Facial granulomatous dermatoses: A clinico-pathological study

Cherry Bansal , Mayanka Batra , Kiran Lata Sharma , Suman Tulsyan , A.N. Srivastava
{"title":"Facial granulomatous dermatoses: A clinico-pathological study","authors":"Cherry Bansal ,&nbsp;Mayanka Batra ,&nbsp;Kiran Lata Sharma ,&nbsp;Suman Tulsyan ,&nbsp;A.N. Srivastava","doi":"10.1016/j.jssdds.2013.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Granulomatous dermatoses frequently present a diagnostic challenge as an identical histologic pattern may be produced by several causes, and conversely, a single cause may produce several histologic patterns. The present study aims at diagnosing facial granulomatous dermatoses based on combination of clinical and histopathological features and evaluating their correlation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Archival records were retrieved and clinically suspected and/or histopathologically diagnosed facial granulomatous dermatoses cases were taken as study material. Clinical and histopathological data was tabulated and concordance rate was calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 832 skin biopsies, 64 were from face and 18 were of facial granulomatous dermatoses. Age ranged 13–55 years with male to female ratio 1.6:1. Majority (88%) were of infectious etiology, leprosy being maximum i.e. 10/18 cases (55%) and borderline tuberculoid outnumbered all other categories with 7/10 cases (70%). Histopathologically, 14 cases (77.78%) had epithelioid granulomas and two each of histiocytic and mixed inflammatory type. Ziehl–Neelsen stain was positive in three cases (16.67%). Overall clinico-pathological concordance rate was 61.11% with 77.77% concordance for leprosy cases.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Major cause of granulomatous diseases in developing countries is still infection. Clinicohistopathological constellation is important to pinpoint a diagnosis to mete out appropriate treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 55-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jssdds.2013.01.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210836X13000031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Granulomatous dermatoses frequently present a diagnostic challenge as an identical histologic pattern may be produced by several causes, and conversely, a single cause may produce several histologic patterns. The present study aims at diagnosing facial granulomatous dermatoses based on combination of clinical and histopathological features and evaluating their correlation.

Methods

Archival records were retrieved and clinically suspected and/or histopathologically diagnosed facial granulomatous dermatoses cases were taken as study material. Clinical and histopathological data was tabulated and concordance rate was calculated.

Results

Out of 832 skin biopsies, 64 were from face and 18 were of facial granulomatous dermatoses. Age ranged 13–55 years with male to female ratio 1.6:1. Majority (88%) were of infectious etiology, leprosy being maximum i.e. 10/18 cases (55%) and borderline tuberculoid outnumbered all other categories with 7/10 cases (70%). Histopathologically, 14 cases (77.78%) had epithelioid granulomas and two each of histiocytic and mixed inflammatory type. Ziehl–Neelsen stain was positive in three cases (16.67%). Overall clinico-pathological concordance rate was 61.11% with 77.77% concordance for leprosy cases.

Conclusion

Major cause of granulomatous diseases in developing countries is still infection. Clinicohistopathological constellation is important to pinpoint a diagnosis to mete out appropriate treatment.

面部肉芽肿性皮肤病的临床病理研究
背景:肉芽肿性皮肤病的诊断经常面临挑战,因为相同的组织学模式可能由多种原因引起,相反,单一原因可能产生多种组织学模式。本研究旨在结合面部肉芽肿性皮肤病的临床和组织病理学特征,并评估其相关性。方法检索档案资料,以临床疑似和/或组织病理学诊断的面部肉芽肿性皮肤病病例为研究材料。将临床和组织病理学资料制成表格,并计算一致性率。结果832例皮肤活检中面部64例,面部肉芽肿性皮肤病18例。年龄13 ~ 55岁,男女比例1.6:1。感染病因占多数(88%),其中以麻风病最多(10/18例,55%),交界性结核以7/10例(70%)超过其他类型。组织病理学上上皮样肉芽肿14例(77.78%),组织细胞型和混合型肉芽肿各2例。Ziehl-Neelsen染色阳性3例(16.67%)。总体临床病理符合率为61.11%,其中麻风病例的符合率为77.77%。结论发展中国家肉芽肿疾病的主要原因仍是感染。临床组织病理学星座是重要的,以确定诊断,以制定适当的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信