Mining Effects on Rural Livelihoods, Adopted Strategies and the Role of Stakeholder and Regulatory Institutions in Ghana. Evidence of the Amansie West District of Ghana

IF 0.6 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
I. Danquah, S. C. Fialor, R. Aidoo
{"title":"Mining Effects on Rural Livelihoods, Adopted Strategies and the Role of Stakeholder and Regulatory Institutions in Ghana. Evidence of the Amansie West District of Ghana","authors":"I. Danquah, S. C. Fialor, R. Aidoo","doi":"10.12691/AJRD-5-1-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study determines the effects of mining on rural livelihoods, adopted strategies and the role of stakeholder and regulatory institutions. The study achieves this by investigating the status of key rural livelihood indicators, what influence the choice of livelihood strategies in mining communities and the assessment of institutional performance. The role of institutions even though a key instrument in ensuring sustainable livelihoods is mostly not considered in livelihood studies of developing countries. The study employed both quantitative and qualitative methods of data analysis. The significant difference in the means of income, yield value and labour cost between non-mining and mining communities is an evidence of the threat posed on communities in the study area by mining and its activities. The multinomial logit result showed that farmers’ choice of livelihood in mining communities was influenced by gender, age, family size, leadership status of household head, labour cost, annual household income, number of years of education and extension training. Farmers diversified into non-farm and off-farm livelihood strategies in order to increase or sustain income in mining communities. The study determined the performance of stakeholder and regulatory institutions through their relations and how effective functions are performed. Four (4) institutions namely EPA, MoFA, COCOBOD and Amansie West District Assembly were found significant in their relations to other institutions whilst three (3) institutions were found significant in the performance of their functions. The study concluded that poor relations and ineffective performance of stakeholder and regulatory institutions resulted in unregulated exposure and depletion of livelihood resources such as land, forest and water bodies in mining communities. The study therefore recommended that there should be inter-institutional policy that would link stakeholder and regulatory institutions together for effective performance of functions and sustainable livelihoods.","PeriodicalId":45379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural and Community Development","volume":"316 1","pages":"19-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural and Community Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/AJRD-5-1-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The study determines the effects of mining on rural livelihoods, adopted strategies and the role of stakeholder and regulatory institutions. The study achieves this by investigating the status of key rural livelihood indicators, what influence the choice of livelihood strategies in mining communities and the assessment of institutional performance. The role of institutions even though a key instrument in ensuring sustainable livelihoods is mostly not considered in livelihood studies of developing countries. The study employed both quantitative and qualitative methods of data analysis. The significant difference in the means of income, yield value and labour cost between non-mining and mining communities is an evidence of the threat posed on communities in the study area by mining and its activities. The multinomial logit result showed that farmers’ choice of livelihood in mining communities was influenced by gender, age, family size, leadership status of household head, labour cost, annual household income, number of years of education and extension training. Farmers diversified into non-farm and off-farm livelihood strategies in order to increase or sustain income in mining communities. The study determined the performance of stakeholder and regulatory institutions through their relations and how effective functions are performed. Four (4) institutions namely EPA, MoFA, COCOBOD and Amansie West District Assembly were found significant in their relations to other institutions whilst three (3) institutions were found significant in the performance of their functions. The study concluded that poor relations and ineffective performance of stakeholder and regulatory institutions resulted in unregulated exposure and depletion of livelihood resources such as land, forest and water bodies in mining communities. The study therefore recommended that there should be inter-institutional policy that would link stakeholder and regulatory institutions together for effective performance of functions and sustainable livelihoods.
采矿对加纳农村生计的影响、所采取的战略以及利益相关者和监管机构的作用。加纳阿曼西西区的证据
该研究确定了采矿对农村生计的影响、采取的战略以及利益相关者和监管机构的作用。该研究通过调查关键农村生计指标的现状、影响矿业社区生计战略选择的因素以及制度绩效评估来实现这一目标。发展中国家的生计研究大多没有考虑到机构的作用,尽管它是确保可持续生计的关键工具。本研究采用定量与定性相结合的数据分析方法。非采矿社区和采矿社区在收入手段、产值和劳动力成本方面的显著差异证明了采矿及其活动对研究地区社区构成的威胁。多项logit结果表明,性别、年龄、家庭规模、户主领导地位、劳动力成本、家庭年收入、受教育年限和推广培训对矿区农民生计选择有影响。农民采取多样化的非农业和非农生计策略,以增加或维持采矿社区的收入。研究通过利益相关者和监管机构之间的关系以及如何有效地履行职能来决定他们的绩效。四(4)个机构,即EPA, MoFA, COCOBOD和Amansie West District Assembly在与其他机构的关系中被发现具有重要意义,而三(3)个机构在其职能的表现中被发现具有重要意义。研究得出的结论是,利益相关者和监管机构之间的不良关系和低效绩效导致了采矿社区土地、森林和水体等生计资源的无监管暴露和枯竭。因此,该研究建议应制定机构间政策,将利益攸关方和监管机构联系在一起,以有效履行职能和维持生计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信