Heating of the solar corona

Joseph V. Hollweg
{"title":"Heating of the solar corona","authors":"Joseph V. Hollweg","doi":"10.1016/0167-7977(90)90011-T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We review a number of models which are currently being considered for coronal heating, but we consider also heating of the chromosphere which requires nearly as much energy as the active corona, and more energy than coronal holes or the quiet corona. There are basically two types of models, which are motivated by a variety of observations. (1) Models which invoke MHD waves generated by the convective motions are motivated by observations of the ubiquitous presence of Alfvén waves in the solar wind. There is evidence that these waves heat and accelerate the solar wind protons and heavy ions. The solar wind thus provides one example of wave heating. Waves have the advantage of being able to heat the chromosphere and photospheric magnetic flux tubes on their way to the corona. MHD turbulence (as observed in the solar wind) or resonance absorption seem to provide adequate dissipation mechanisms. A problem with wave theories is that the waves tend to be reflected by the steep Alfén speed gradient in the chromosphere and transition region, but it is estimated that adequate energy fluxes can enter the open corona, or closed coronal loops if global loop resonances can be excited. Short coronal loops (<em>L</em>≲10<sup>4</sup> km) can also receive adequate wave energy fluxes even if the loop resonances are not excited, but a problem exists with getting enough energy into intermediate length loops (<em>L</em>≈10<sup>4</sup>-5×10<sup>4</sup> km) since their resonant frequencies are possibly to high to be excited. (2) Models which invoke the gradual buildup of coronal magnetic energy due to random walks of the photospheric flux tubes, and the subsequent release of that energy via current sheet information and reconnection, are supported by observations indicating that localized impulsive heating and dynamic events occur in the transition region and corona. These models cannot explain the chromospheric heating or the coronal heating on open field lines. They require substantial random walks of the photospheric footpoints, which still need to observationally verified. A third possibility, which has not been studied in detail, is that the chromospheric and coronal heating is associated with emergence and cancellation of magnetic flux. All types of models are ripe for further studies using numerical simulations, and along the way we shall offer several suggestions for fruitful numerical studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100318,"journal":{"name":"Computer Physics Reports","volume":"12 4","pages":"Pages 205-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-7977(90)90011-T","citationCount":"75","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Physics Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016779779090011T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 75

Abstract

We review a number of models which are currently being considered for coronal heating, but we consider also heating of the chromosphere which requires nearly as much energy as the active corona, and more energy than coronal holes or the quiet corona. There are basically two types of models, which are motivated by a variety of observations. (1) Models which invoke MHD waves generated by the convective motions are motivated by observations of the ubiquitous presence of Alfvén waves in the solar wind. There is evidence that these waves heat and accelerate the solar wind protons and heavy ions. The solar wind thus provides one example of wave heating. Waves have the advantage of being able to heat the chromosphere and photospheric magnetic flux tubes on their way to the corona. MHD turbulence (as observed in the solar wind) or resonance absorption seem to provide adequate dissipation mechanisms. A problem with wave theories is that the waves tend to be reflected by the steep Alfén speed gradient in the chromosphere and transition region, but it is estimated that adequate energy fluxes can enter the open corona, or closed coronal loops if global loop resonances can be excited. Short coronal loops (L≲104 km) can also receive adequate wave energy fluxes even if the loop resonances are not excited, but a problem exists with getting enough energy into intermediate length loops (L≈104-5×104 km) since their resonant frequencies are possibly to high to be excited. (2) Models which invoke the gradual buildup of coronal magnetic energy due to random walks of the photospheric flux tubes, and the subsequent release of that energy via current sheet information and reconnection, are supported by observations indicating that localized impulsive heating and dynamic events occur in the transition region and corona. These models cannot explain the chromospheric heating or the coronal heating on open field lines. They require substantial random walks of the photospheric footpoints, which still need to observationally verified. A third possibility, which has not been studied in detail, is that the chromospheric and coronal heating is associated with emergence and cancellation of magnetic flux. All types of models are ripe for further studies using numerical simulations, and along the way we shall offer several suggestions for fruitful numerical studies.

日冕的加热
我们回顾了一些目前正在考虑日冕加热的模型,但我们也考虑了色球层的加热,它需要的能量几乎和活动日冕一样多,比日冕洞或安静日冕更多。基本上有两种类型的模型,它们是由各种各样的观察结果驱动的。(1)利用对流运动产生的MHD波的模式是由观测到的太阳风中普遍存在的alfvsamn波所驱动的。有证据表明,这些波加热并加速了太阳风中的质子和重离子。因此,太阳风提供了波浪加热的一个例子。波的优点是能够在到达日冕的途中加热色球层和光球层的磁通管。MHD湍流(如在太阳风中观察到的)或共振吸收似乎提供了足够的耗散机制。波动理论的一个问题是,波往往在色球层和过渡区被陡峭的alf速度梯度所反映,但据估计,如果能够激发全局环共振,则足够的能量通量可以进入开放的日冕或闭合的日冕环。短的日冕环(L = 104 km)即使不激发共振也能获得足够的波能通量,但由于中间长度环(L≈104-5×104 km)的共振频率可能高到无法被激发,因此存在一个问题,即如何将足够的能量注入到中间长度环(L≈104-5×104 km)中。(2)由于光球磁通管的随机行走,日冕磁能逐渐积聚,然后通过电流片信息和重联释放,这些模型得到了在过渡区和日冕发生局部脉冲加热和动态事件的观测结果的支持。这些模式不能解释色球加热或日冕加热在开放磁场线上。它们需要对光球足迹点进行大量的随机漫步,这仍需要通过观测加以验证。第三种尚未详细研究的可能性是,色球和日冕加热与磁通量的出现和消除有关。所有类型的模型都是成熟的,可以使用数值模拟进行进一步的研究,在此过程中,我们将为富有成效的数值研究提供一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信