AN APPRAISAL OF THE CENTRALITY OF MUGHAL DHAKA ALIAS JAHANGIRNAGAR BASED ON A MODIFIED VERSION OF CENTRAL PLACE THEORY

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Sharif
{"title":"AN APPRAISAL OF THE CENTRALITY OF MUGHAL DHAKA ALIAS JAHANGIRNAGAR BASED ON A MODIFIED VERSION OF CENTRAL PLACE THEORY","authors":"A. Sharif","doi":"10.31577/aassav.2022.31.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dhaka alias Jahangirnagar became the capital of Mughal Subah-i-Bangalah in the early 17th century CE. As the principal seat of the region and the centre of trade and commerce, it attracted the opportunity seekers, travellers, traders, government officials from different parts of the then known world and became a true cosmopolitan city. During the Mughal period the city was full of beautiful palaces, forts, richly decorated houses, caravanserais, mosques, shops, streets, bridges, etc. But owing to the ravages of time and the unplanned development of modern Dhaka, nothing is left except a few mosques, tombs, the ruins of a fort, and a few local names associated with the Mughals. It is now difficult to locate Jahangirnagar, the Mughal capital of Subah-i-Bangalah, based on archaeological evidence. Previous researchers (mostly historians, and/or architects) attempted to locate the capital in the older of part of present-day Dhaka through analysing mostly historical narratives, and occasionally material evidence. Owing to a lack of training in archaeological data analysis, early assumptions and narratives show an absence of archaeological interpretation of material evidence. However, the present research does not seek to challenge the accepted narrative of Dhaka as the capital of Mughal Bengal; rather it is an attempt to comprehend the centrality of Dhaka by using archaeological evidence and by analysing some parameters developed from modified versions of Christaller’s Central Place Theory presented by Kimmig and Gringmuth- Dallmer.","PeriodicalId":55909,"journal":{"name":"Asian and African Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian and African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/aassav.2022.31.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dhaka alias Jahangirnagar became the capital of Mughal Subah-i-Bangalah in the early 17th century CE. As the principal seat of the region and the centre of trade and commerce, it attracted the opportunity seekers, travellers, traders, government officials from different parts of the then known world and became a true cosmopolitan city. During the Mughal period the city was full of beautiful palaces, forts, richly decorated houses, caravanserais, mosques, shops, streets, bridges, etc. But owing to the ravages of time and the unplanned development of modern Dhaka, nothing is left except a few mosques, tombs, the ruins of a fort, and a few local names associated with the Mughals. It is now difficult to locate Jahangirnagar, the Mughal capital of Subah-i-Bangalah, based on archaeological evidence. Previous researchers (mostly historians, and/or architects) attempted to locate the capital in the older of part of present-day Dhaka through analysing mostly historical narratives, and occasionally material evidence. Owing to a lack of training in archaeological data analysis, early assumptions and narratives show an absence of archaeological interpretation of material evidence. However, the present research does not seek to challenge the accepted narrative of Dhaka as the capital of Mughal Bengal; rather it is an attempt to comprehend the centrality of Dhaka by using archaeological evidence and by analysing some parameters developed from modified versions of Christaller’s Central Place Theory presented by Kimmig and Gringmuth- Dallmer.
基于中心地理论修正版的莫卧儿王朝达卡别名贾汉吉纳格尔的中心地位评价
达卡,别名Jahangirnagar,在公元17世纪初成为莫卧儿王朝subah -i- bangalore的首都。作为该地区的主要所在地和贸易和商业中心,它吸引了来自当时已知世界不同地区的机会寻求者、旅行者、商人和政府官员,成为一个真正的国际大都市。在莫卧儿时期,这座城市充满了美丽的宫殿、堡垒、装饰华丽的房屋、商队驿站、清真寺、商店、街道、桥梁等。但由于时间的摧残和现代达卡的无计划发展,除了几座清真寺、坟墓、一个堡垒的废墟和一些与莫卧儿有关的当地名字外,什么都没有留下。根据考古证据,现在很难找到莫卧儿王朝的首都贾汗吉纳格尔。以前的研究人员(主要是历史学家和/或建筑师)试图通过分析大部分历史叙述和偶尔的物质证据,将首都定位在今天达卡的旧部分。由于缺乏考古数据分析方面的训练,早期的假设和叙述表明缺乏对物证的考古解释。然而,目前的研究并不试图挑战达卡作为莫卧儿孟加拉首都的公认叙述;相反,它是一种尝试,通过使用考古证据和分析一些参数来理解达卡的中心地位,这些参数是由Kimmig和Gringmuth- Dallmer提出的Christaller的中心地理论的修改版本发展而来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian and African Studies
Asian and African Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Vitajte na stránkach Ústavu orientalistiky SAV Ponúkame vám informácie o: - histórii a súčastnosti - interných pracovníkoch - štruktúre - grantoch a projektoch - časopise Asian and African Studies - knižnici - Slovenskej orientalistickej spoločnosti - združení PRO ORIENTE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信