Young, free and biased: A comparison of mainstream and right-wing media coverage of the 201516 refugee crisis in German newspapers

Q2 Social Sciences
Gerret von Nordheim, H. Müller, Michael Scheppe
{"title":"Young, free and biased: A comparison of mainstream and right-wing media coverage of the 201516 refugee crisis in German newspapers","authors":"Gerret von Nordheim, H. Müller, Michael Scheppe","doi":"10.1386/JOACM_00042_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Right-wing media have been growing in terms of readership and impact in recent years. However, comparative analyses that gauge linkages between mainstream and right-wing media in Europe are virtually missing. We pursued an algorithm-based topic-modelling analysis of 11,420 articles\n concerning the question of whether reporting of the leading German right-wing newspaper Junge Freiheit differed from that of mainstream media outlets in the context of the refugee crisis of 201516. The results strongly support this notion. They show a clear-cut dichotomy with mainstream\n media on one side and Junge Freiheit on the other. A time lag could be found, pointing to a reporting pattern that positioned Junge Freiheit relative to the journalistic and political mainstream. Thus, Junge Freiheit can be characterised as a reactive alternative media\n outlet that is prone to populism: it stresses the national dimension of the crisis, embraces the positions of the right-wing party Alternative fr Deutschland (AfD) and largely neglects complex international, and particularly European, implications.","PeriodicalId":36092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alternative and Community Media","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alternative and Community Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/JOACM_00042_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Right-wing media have been growing in terms of readership and impact in recent years. However, comparative analyses that gauge linkages between mainstream and right-wing media in Europe are virtually missing. We pursued an algorithm-based topic-modelling analysis of 11,420 articles concerning the question of whether reporting of the leading German right-wing newspaper Junge Freiheit differed from that of mainstream media outlets in the context of the refugee crisis of 201516. The results strongly support this notion. They show a clear-cut dichotomy with mainstream media on one side and Junge Freiheit on the other. A time lag could be found, pointing to a reporting pattern that positioned Junge Freiheit relative to the journalistic and political mainstream. Thus, Junge Freiheit can be characterised as a reactive alternative media outlet that is prone to populism: it stresses the national dimension of the crisis, embraces the positions of the right-wing party Alternative fr Deutschland (AfD) and largely neglects complex international, and particularly European, implications.
年轻、自由和偏见:主流和右翼媒体对2015 - 2016年德国报纸难民危机报道的比较
近年来,右翼媒体在读者群和影响力方面一直在增长。然而,衡量欧洲主流媒体和右翼媒体之间联系的比较分析实际上是缺失的。我们对11,420篇文章进行了基于算法的主题建模分析,这些文章涉及德国主要右翼报纸Junge Freiheit在2015年难民危机背景下的报道是否与主流媒体的报道不同。研究结果有力地支持了这一观点。他们表现出鲜明的二分法,一边是主流媒体,另一边是Junge Freiheit。可以发现一个时间差,指出了一种将Junge freeheit定位于新闻和政治主流的报道模式。因此,《自由Junge》可以被描述为一个倾向于民粹主义的反应性另类媒体:它强调危机的国家层面,拥护右翼政党德国新选择党(alternative for Deutschland,简称AfD)的立场,在很大程度上忽视了复杂的国际影响,尤其是欧洲影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alternative and Community Media
Journal of Alternative and Community Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信