Prosthetic maintenance assessment for implant fixed complete dentures and implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial

Q3 Dentistry
N. Awaad, Marwa Abdelaal Elsadek, DoaaM Elkady
{"title":"Prosthetic maintenance assessment for implant fixed complete dentures and implant\n overdentures: a randomized clinical trial","authors":"N. Awaad, Marwa Abdelaal Elsadek, DoaaM Elkady","doi":"10.4322/bds.2023.e3736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The rehabilitation choice for the edentulous patients usually lies between the fixed and removable prosthetic options. The treatment decisions are affected by many factors where complications and maintenance needs are both considered crucial factors, in addition to the cost effectiveness of the chosen treatment. Material and Methods: This study was applied on 44 edentulous patients, where 22 patient for each group were enrolled in the outpatient clinic of prosthodontics, Cairo University as per a set of eligibility criteria. Four inter-foraminal implants were installed for all eligible participants. Three months later, healing abutments were used for soft tissue preparation prior to the fabrication of the final prosthesis. A prosthetic treatment option was then randomly allocated to obtain two equal groups via computer generated randomization program; Group. A received telescopic implant overdentures, and Group. B received screw retained dentures. All Complications (Screw loosening or fracture, tooth or denture base fracture and mucositis) were reported after overdenture insertion along the follow up period (1, 6, 9 and 12 months respectively). Results: The frequency of the screw loosening for hybrid overdentures where (59.1%) compared to (27.3%) of telescopic prosthesis at 12 months follow up period (p=0.035), mucositis reporting at 6m interval had shown the highest frequency in both groups (Group A (54.5%), Group B (81.8%), (p=0.045), all other reported complications that lack statistical significance either within the same group or between both groups at different time intervals. Conclusion: Both treatment modalities; telescopic implant overdenture and hybrid fixed screw-retained are reliable for restoring the completely edentulous arches, the decision whether to make a fixed or removable implant denture shall be guided with the patient preference together with the dentist assessment in relation to the patient’s state of general and oral health.","PeriodicalId":37577,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Dental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2023.e3736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The rehabilitation choice for the edentulous patients usually lies between the fixed and removable prosthetic options. The treatment decisions are affected by many factors where complications and maintenance needs are both considered crucial factors, in addition to the cost effectiveness of the chosen treatment. Material and Methods: This study was applied on 44 edentulous patients, where 22 patient for each group were enrolled in the outpatient clinic of prosthodontics, Cairo University as per a set of eligibility criteria. Four inter-foraminal implants were installed for all eligible participants. Three months later, healing abutments were used for soft tissue preparation prior to the fabrication of the final prosthesis. A prosthetic treatment option was then randomly allocated to obtain two equal groups via computer generated randomization program; Group. A received telescopic implant overdentures, and Group. B received screw retained dentures. All Complications (Screw loosening or fracture, tooth or denture base fracture and mucositis) were reported after overdenture insertion along the follow up period (1, 6, 9 and 12 months respectively). Results: The frequency of the screw loosening for hybrid overdentures where (59.1%) compared to (27.3%) of telescopic prosthesis at 12 months follow up period (p=0.035), mucositis reporting at 6m interval had shown the highest frequency in both groups (Group A (54.5%), Group B (81.8%), (p=0.045), all other reported complications that lack statistical significance either within the same group or between both groups at different time intervals. Conclusion: Both treatment modalities; telescopic implant overdenture and hybrid fixed screw-retained are reliable for restoring the completely edentulous arches, the decision whether to make a fixed or removable implant denture shall be guided with the patient preference together with the dentist assessment in relation to the patient’s state of general and oral health.
种植固定全口义齿和种植覆盖义齿的维护评估:一项随机临床试验
目的:无牙患者的康复选择通常在固定义肢和活动义肢之间进行。治疗决策受到许多因素的影响,除了所选治疗的成本效益外,并发症和维持需求都被认为是关键因素。材料与方法:本研究采用44例无牙患者,每组22例患者在开罗大学口腔修复科门诊按照一套入选标准进行入选。所有符合条件的参与者均安装了4个椎间孔内植入物。三个月后,在制作最终假体之前,使用愈合基台进行软组织准备。然后通过计算机生成的随机化程序随机分配一种假体治疗方案,得到两个相等的组;组。1组接受套筒种植覆盖义齿。B组接受螺钉固位义齿。在随访期间(分别为1、6、9、12个月)报告了覆盖义齿置入后的所有并发症(螺钉松动或断裂、牙基或义齿基托断裂、黏膜炎)。结果:随访12个月时,复合覆盖义齿螺钉松动发生率为59.1%,套套义齿为27.3% (p=0.035);黏膜炎发生率以间隔6m时最高(A组为54.5%,B组为81.8%,p=0.045),其他并发症在同一组内或不同时间间隔时两组间均无统计学意义。结论:两种治疗方式;套筒式种植覆盖义齿和混合式固定螺钉固位义齿是修复全无牙弓的可靠方法,选择固定义齿还是可移动义齿应根据患者的喜好,结合患者的全身及口腔健康状况,由牙医进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brazilian Dental Science
Brazilian Dental Science Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal BRAZILIAN DENTAL SCIENCE is a trimonthly scientific publication of the Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos - UNESP. MISSION - To disseminate and promote the interchange of scientific information amongst the national and international dental community, by means of basic and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信