Lost in Translation in 1666. A Translation Dispute Between the Philosophical Transactions and the Journal des Sçavans

David Banks
{"title":"Lost in Translation in 1666. A Translation Dispute Between the Philosophical Transactions and the Journal des Sçavans","authors":"David Banks","doi":"10.1080/00437956.2022.2160148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions were the first two academic periodicals, and in their early years each frequently translated items taken from the other. In one such case, an item in the Journal des Sçavans which was a translation of a piece from the Philosophical Transactions, provoked a critical letter subsequently published in the French periodical. This letter produced a virulent response from the Philosophical Transactions’ editor, Henry Oldenburg. Study of a number of linguistic features, including process types and thematic structure shows that while there are a number of small differences between the source text and its translation, none of them are particularly significant. It is likely that Oldenburg’s riposte fits into a pattern of defending members of the Royal Society against foreign criticism.","PeriodicalId":84010,"journal":{"name":"Word & world","volume":"32 1","pages":"11 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Word & world","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2022.2160148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions were the first two academic periodicals, and in their early years each frequently translated items taken from the other. In one such case, an item in the Journal des Sçavans which was a translation of a piece from the Philosophical Transactions, provoked a critical letter subsequently published in the French periodical. This letter produced a virulent response from the Philosophical Transactions’ editor, Henry Oldenburg. Study of a number of linguistic features, including process types and thematic structure shows that while there are a number of small differences between the source text and its translation, none of them are particularly significant. It is likely that Oldenburg’s riposte fits into a pattern of defending members of the Royal Society against foreign criticism.
1666年出版的《迷失东京》《哲学汇刊》与《哲学学报》的翻译之争
《哲学学报》和《哲学学报》是最早的两种学术期刊,在它们的早期,它们都经常翻译对方的文章。在一个这样的例子中,《斯帕拉瓦斯杂志》上的一篇文章是《哲学汇刊》上的一篇文章的翻译,引起了后来在法国期刊上发表的一封批评信。这封信引起了《哲学学报》编辑亨利·奥尔登堡的激烈回应。对包括过程类型和主位结构在内的一些语言特征的研究表明,虽然源文本和译文之间存在一些微小的差异,但没有一个特别显著。奥尔登堡的反驳很可能符合一种捍卫皇家学会成员反对外国批评的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书