Innovative Output in China

Jonathan D. Putnam, H. Luu, N. Ngo
{"title":"Innovative Output in China","authors":"Jonathan D. Putnam, H. Luu, N. Ngo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3760816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the explosive growth in Chinese domestic patenting over the period 2000-2018 from the point of view of a global knowledge production function. When new knowledge production is global, subsidies to patenting increase the number of patent applications, but cannot increase the real number of innovations. Using the rest of the world as a benchmark, we estimate the expected number of applications that \"should'' have been filed in China, based on macroeconomic innovation determinants (population, income, researchers and R&D). We find that, by 2018, China's residents filed about 1.4 million applications, while its underlying fundamentals predict about 212,000 applications -- total inflation of more than 500%. After computing a domestic patent \"deflator,'' we investigate the extent to which domestic patent inflation extends to China's patenting abroad, where we find an inverse relationship between the propensity to export and patent quality. We investigate applications and exports in the telecommunications sector, where despite a higher-than-average export propensity, both the growth rate and the average quality of patents have fallen over the past decade. Finally, after calibrating our results, we find that the increase in the aggregate quantity of Chinese patents is associated with a corresponding reduction in quality, to only about 19% of the quality of an unsubsidized sample. These offsetting quantity-quality effects do not increase aggregate innovation, but increase the aggregate value of domestic patents by about 24%. In short, reports of the Chinese takeover of the world's innovation systems are greatly exaggerated.","PeriodicalId":14586,"journal":{"name":"IO: Productivity","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Productivity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3760816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We study the explosive growth in Chinese domestic patenting over the period 2000-2018 from the point of view of a global knowledge production function. When new knowledge production is global, subsidies to patenting increase the number of patent applications, but cannot increase the real number of innovations. Using the rest of the world as a benchmark, we estimate the expected number of applications that "should'' have been filed in China, based on macroeconomic innovation determinants (population, income, researchers and R&D). We find that, by 2018, China's residents filed about 1.4 million applications, while its underlying fundamentals predict about 212,000 applications -- total inflation of more than 500%. After computing a domestic patent "deflator,'' we investigate the extent to which domestic patent inflation extends to China's patenting abroad, where we find an inverse relationship between the propensity to export and patent quality. We investigate applications and exports in the telecommunications sector, where despite a higher-than-average export propensity, both the growth rate and the average quality of patents have fallen over the past decade. Finally, after calibrating our results, we find that the increase in the aggregate quantity of Chinese patents is associated with a corresponding reduction in quality, to only about 19% of the quality of an unsubsidized sample. These offsetting quantity-quality effects do not increase aggregate innovation, but increase the aggregate value of domestic patents by about 24%. In short, reports of the Chinese takeover of the world's innovation systems are greatly exaggerated.
中国的创新产出
本文从全球知识生产函数的角度研究了2000-2018年间中国国内专利申请量的爆炸式增长。当新知识生产是全球性的时,对专利的补贴增加了专利申请的数量,但不能增加真正的创新数量。以世界其他地区为基准,基于宏观经济创新决定因素(人口、收入、研究人员和研发),我们估计了中国“应该”提交的预期申请数量。我们发现,到2018年,中国居民提交了约140万份申请,而其基本面预测约为21.2万份申请——总通货膨胀率超过500%。在计算了国内专利“平减指数”之后,我们研究了国内专利膨胀对中国在国外申请专利的影响程度,发现出口倾向与专利质量之间呈反比关系。我们调查了电信行业的申请和出口,尽管该行业的出口倾向高于平均水平,但在过去十年中,专利的增长率和平均质量都有所下降。最后,在校准我们的结果后,我们发现中国专利总量的增加与质量的相应下降有关,仅为无补贴样本质量的19%左右。这些抵消的数量-质量效应并没有增加总创新,但使国内专利的总价值增加了约24%。简而言之,有关中国接管世界创新体系的报道被严重夸大了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信