What matters for patients’ experiences with primary care? A study of variation in patient reported experience measures with regard to structural and organisational characteristics of primary care centres in a Swedish region.

A. Glenngård
{"title":"What matters for patients’ experiences with primary care? A study of variation in patient reported experience measures with regard to structural and organisational characteristics of primary care centres in a Swedish region.","authors":"A. Glenngård","doi":"10.5617/NJHE.8030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research on variation in patient reported experience measures (PREMs) suggest that it is important to be cautious when using comparative information about patients’ experiences, collected via patient surveys, to assess provider performance. Not all factors associated with variation in PREMs are related to factors that providers themselves can control. This study explores if structural characteristics of primary care practices (PCCs), that are difficult to control, and the way that providers manage and organise their work matter for patients’ experiences with care. The purpose was to analyse variation in PREMs at the PCC level in Swedish primary care, with regard to structural characteristics of PCCs, including patient mix, and variables representing how providers organise and manage their work. Since the choice reform in 2007-2010, there is a mix of public and private providers, all with public funding and operating under the same overall requirements. The analysis is based on data from a national patient survey in primary care and registry data from a large Swedish region. OLS regression analysis was used to study variation in seven PREM-dimensions in regards to variables representing structural and organisational characteristics and processes of work at PCCs, covering the years 2018-2019 (N=281 PCC year observations). The results imply that variables that can be changed by providers themselves matter more for patients’ experiences with care than factors that providers cannot control. The most significant associations were found between PREMs and proportion and continuity of GP visits and adherence to clinical guidelines regarding treatment of risk groups. However, it is a challenge for providers to offer a high proportion of visits with GPs and good continuity due to a persisting shortage of GPs in Sweden. Recent policy initiatives have been introduced in this area. From a policy perspective, variation in patients’ experiences with regard to socioeconomic conditions is also a concern.\nPublished: Online August 2021\n ","PeriodicalId":30931,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Health Economics","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5617/NJHE.8030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Previous research on variation in patient reported experience measures (PREMs) suggest that it is important to be cautious when using comparative information about patients’ experiences, collected via patient surveys, to assess provider performance. Not all factors associated with variation in PREMs are related to factors that providers themselves can control. This study explores if structural characteristics of primary care practices (PCCs), that are difficult to control, and the way that providers manage and organise their work matter for patients’ experiences with care. The purpose was to analyse variation in PREMs at the PCC level in Swedish primary care, with regard to structural characteristics of PCCs, including patient mix, and variables representing how providers organise and manage their work. Since the choice reform in 2007-2010, there is a mix of public and private providers, all with public funding and operating under the same overall requirements. The analysis is based on data from a national patient survey in primary care and registry data from a large Swedish region. OLS regression analysis was used to study variation in seven PREM-dimensions in regards to variables representing structural and organisational characteristics and processes of work at PCCs, covering the years 2018-2019 (N=281 PCC year observations). The results imply that variables that can be changed by providers themselves matter more for patients’ experiences with care than factors that providers cannot control. The most significant associations were found between PREMs and proportion and continuity of GP visits and adherence to clinical guidelines regarding treatment of risk groups. However, it is a challenge for providers to offer a high proportion of visits with GPs and good continuity due to a persisting shortage of GPs in Sweden. Recent policy initiatives have been introduced in this area. From a policy perspective, variation in patients’ experiences with regard to socioeconomic conditions is also a concern. Published: Online August 2021  
什么对患者的初级保健经历至关重要?一项关于瑞典地区初级保健中心结构和组织特征的患者报告经验措施变化的研究。
先前关于患者报告经验测量(PREMs)差异的研究表明,在使用通过患者调查收集的关于患者经验的比较信息来评估提供者绩效时,保持谨慎是很重要的。并非所有与prem变化相关的因素都与供应商自己能够控制的因素有关。本研究探讨了难以控制的初级保健实践(PCCs)的结构特征,以及提供者管理和组织工作的方式对患者护理经历的影响。目的是分析瑞典初级保健PCC水平PREMs的变化,考虑到PCC的结构特征,包括患者组合,以及代表提供者如何组织和管理其工作的变量。自2007-2010年的选择改革以来,公立和私立医疗机构混合在一起,它们都有公共资金,并在相同的总体要求下运作。该分析基于一项全国初级保健患者调查的数据和瑞典一个大地区的登记数据。采用OLS回归分析研究了代表PCC结构和组织特征以及工作过程的变量在prem - 7个维度上的变化,涵盖了2018-2019年(N=281 PCC年观测值)。研究结果表明,对于患者的护理体验而言,服务提供者自己可以改变的变量比服务提供者无法控制的因素更重要。最显著的关联是发现PREMs与全科医生就诊的比例和连续性以及对治疗风险群体的临床指南的依从性之间的关系。然而,由于瑞典的全科医生持续短缺,提供者提供高比例的全科医生访问和良好的连续性是一个挑战。最近在这一领域提出了政策倡议。从政策角度来看,患者在社会经济条件方面的经验差异也是一个问题。出版日期:2021年8月
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
51 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信