Define-HF and Emperial Trials: Lessons Learned

S. Ghosal
{"title":"Define-HF and Emperial Trials: Lessons Learned","authors":"S. Ghosal","doi":"10.35248/2155-6156.20.11.848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sodium Glucose co-transporter inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have firmly established their position in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and have also expanded their indication for use. There were different outcomes benefits with the three SGLT-2i, resulting from differences in patient population studied, primary end-points chosen and statistical testing hierarchy. Although the outcome benefits complemented each other, the subtle differences were blown out of proportion by interested lobbies, eyeing a larger pie of the market share. The corporate war intensified with the publication and top-line results of 2 two recent symptom-based trials in patients with heart failure (DEFINEHF & EMPERIAL). Once again, the differences were subtle and there were more similarities than differences. Diuretics provide the desired symptom relief whereas SGLT-2i are associated with hard end-point outcome benefits. In view of the profound benefits associated with the use of SGLT-2i two additional categories of studies were launched. The first explored the area of symptomatic relief and the second concentrated on the mechanistic benefits. This review looks in depth at the different types of trials conducted with SGLT-2i and their similarities which is supported by all the recently published guidelines.","PeriodicalId":15597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of diabetes & metabolism","volume":"110 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of diabetes & metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2155-6156.20.11.848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sodium Glucose co-transporter inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have firmly established their position in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and have also expanded their indication for use. There were different outcomes benefits with the three SGLT-2i, resulting from differences in patient population studied, primary end-points chosen and statistical testing hierarchy. Although the outcome benefits complemented each other, the subtle differences were blown out of proportion by interested lobbies, eyeing a larger pie of the market share. The corporate war intensified with the publication and top-line results of 2 two recent symptom-based trials in patients with heart failure (DEFINEHF & EMPERIAL). Once again, the differences were subtle and there were more similarities than differences. Diuretics provide the desired symptom relief whereas SGLT-2i are associated with hard end-point outcome benefits. In view of the profound benefits associated with the use of SGLT-2i two additional categories of studies were launched. The first explored the area of symptomatic relief and the second concentrated on the mechanistic benefits. This review looks in depth at the different types of trials conducted with SGLT-2i and their similarities which is supported by all the recently published guidelines.
定义hf和实验试验:经验教训
葡萄糖共转运蛋白抑制剂钠(SGLT-2i)已经在2型糖尿病(T2DM)的治疗中确立了其地位,并扩大了其适应症。由于所研究的患者群体、所选择的主要终点和统计检验层次的差异,三种SGLT-2i的结局获益不同。尽管结果上的好处是相辅相成的,但这些细微的差别却被兴趣浓厚的游说团体夸大了,他们觊觎更大的市场份额。随着最近两项针对心力衰竭患者的基于症状的试验(DEFINEHF和imperial)的发表和主要结果的公布,企业之间的战争愈演愈烈。再一次,差异是微妙的,相似之处多于不同之处。利尿剂提供所需的症状缓解,而SGLT-2i则与硬终点结果获益相关。鉴于使用SGLT-2i带来的深远好处,又开展了另外两类研究。第一个研究探讨了症状缓解的领域,第二个研究集中在机制上的益处。这篇综述深入探讨了使用SGLT-2i进行的不同类型的试验及其相似之处,这些相似之处得到了所有最近发表的指南的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信