Uracil/tegafur as a possible salvage therapy in chemo-refractory colorectal cancer patients: a single institutional retrospective study

I. V. Bayoglu, I. Yıldız, U. Varol, S. Çokmert, A. Alacacıoğlu, Y. Kucukzeybek, M. Akyol, L. Demir, A. Dirican, O. Tarhan
{"title":"Uracil/tegafur as a possible salvage therapy in chemo-refractory colorectal cancer patients: a single institutional retrospective study","authors":"I. V. Bayoglu, I. Yıldız, U. Varol, S. Çokmert, A. Alacacıoğlu, Y. Kucukzeybek, M. Akyol, L. Demir, A. Dirican, O. Tarhan","doi":"10.5114/wo.2015.53374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of the study Our aim was to determine the activity and toxicity of uracil/tegafur and leucovorin combination in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who have progressed with all currently active agents. Material and methods This study was a retrospective analysis of 50 mCRC patients who had previously failed to respond to all available chemotherapeutics and who received subsequent treatment with uracil/tegafur 250 mg/m2 d1–5 in combination with leucovorin 90 mg/day, d1–5 followed by two days’ rest. Results The median age of the patients was 60 years. Most of them (60%) were male. Bevacizumab was used in 65% and cetuximab in 55% of the patients. Thirty-nine patients (78%) were treated with uracil/tegafur in the fourth line setting. The median treatment duration was 4.2 months (range, 2–24 months). The objective response rate and the disease control rate were 4% and 34%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.6–4.6 months) and overall survival was 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.5–8.6 months). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was seen in 20% (n = 10) of the patients while 60% (n = 6) of them required dose reductions. Conclusions This retrospective data show that uracil/tegafur may be considered in heavily pretreated mCRC patients because of its activity, lower toxicity, and feasibility.","PeriodicalId":10652,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Oncology","volume":"66 1","pages":"385 - 390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2015.53374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim of the study Our aim was to determine the activity and toxicity of uracil/tegafur and leucovorin combination in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who have progressed with all currently active agents. Material and methods This study was a retrospective analysis of 50 mCRC patients who had previously failed to respond to all available chemotherapeutics and who received subsequent treatment with uracil/tegafur 250 mg/m2 d1–5 in combination with leucovorin 90 mg/day, d1–5 followed by two days’ rest. Results The median age of the patients was 60 years. Most of them (60%) were male. Bevacizumab was used in 65% and cetuximab in 55% of the patients. Thirty-nine patients (78%) were treated with uracil/tegafur in the fourth line setting. The median treatment duration was 4.2 months (range, 2–24 months). The objective response rate and the disease control rate were 4% and 34%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.6–4.6 months) and overall survival was 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.5–8.6 months). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was seen in 20% (n = 10) of the patients while 60% (n = 6) of them required dose reductions. Conclusions This retrospective data show that uracil/tegafur may be considered in heavily pretreated mCRC patients because of its activity, lower toxicity, and feasibility.
尿嘧啶/替加氟作为化疗难治性结直肠癌患者可能的补救性治疗:一项单一机构回顾性研究
我们的目的是确定尿嘧啶/替加富和亚叶酸蛋白联合治疗进展的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的活性和毒性。材料和方法本研究回顾性分析了50例既往化疗无效的mCRC患者,这些患者随后接受了尿嘧啶/替加富250mg /m2 d1-5联合亚叶酸素90mg /d, d1-5,随后休息2天。结果患者中位年龄60岁。其中大多数(60%)是男性。65%的患者使用贝伐单抗,55%的患者使用西妥昔单抗。39名患者(78%)在第四线环境中接受尿嘧啶/替加富治疗。中位治疗时间为4.2个月(范围2-24个月)。客观有效率为4%,疾病控制率为34%。中位无进展生存期为4.1个月(95% CI, 3.6-4.6个月),总生存期为6.6个月(95% CI, 4.5-8.6个月)。20% (n = 10)的患者出现3级或4级毒性,60% (n = 6)的患者需要减少剂量。结论本回顾性数据显示,由于尿嘧啶/替加富的活性、低毒性和可行性,可能被考虑用于重度预处理的mCRC患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信