Comparing Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions and Hyoid Bone Position in the Subgroups of Skeletal Class III Malocclusions: A Cephalometric Study

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
MH Buyukcavus, G. Kocakara
{"title":"Comparing Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions and Hyoid Bone Position in the Subgroups of Skeletal Class III Malocclusions: A Cephalometric Study","authors":"MH Buyukcavus, G. Kocakara","doi":"10.1177/2320206820960860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To examine pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone position according to the subgroups of Class III malocclusion. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study consisted of patients divided into three subgroups with skeletal Class III malocclusion. The study included a total of 151 individuals (61 females and 90 males). The authors divided individuals with skeletal Class III malocclusion into three subgroups: maxillary retrognathia, mandibular prognathia, and combined. The study’s cephalometric analysis used eight nasopharyngeal, seven oropharyngeal, two hypopharyngeal, nine hyoid, and four area measurements. One-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate patients. Tukey’s post-hoc tests were used for bilateral comparisons of significant parameters. The results were considered statistically significant at a P < .05 significance level. Results: The study found no significant differences between the groups’ pharyngeal airway and area measurements (P > .05). When the authors evaluated hyoid bone position, a statistically significant difference was found between the three groups’ Hy-A (mm), Hy-S (mm), Hy-SN (mm), and Hy-FH (mm) measurements (P < .05). Conclusion: Linear and areal pharyngeal airway dimensions are similar in subgroups of Class III malocclusions, while the hyoid bone is vertically higher in individuals with maxillary retrognathia.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"86 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2320206820960860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: To examine pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone position according to the subgroups of Class III malocclusion. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study consisted of patients divided into three subgroups with skeletal Class III malocclusion. The study included a total of 151 individuals (61 females and 90 males). The authors divided individuals with skeletal Class III malocclusion into three subgroups: maxillary retrognathia, mandibular prognathia, and combined. The study’s cephalometric analysis used eight nasopharyngeal, seven oropharyngeal, two hypopharyngeal, nine hyoid, and four area measurements. One-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate patients. Tukey’s post-hoc tests were used for bilateral comparisons of significant parameters. The results were considered statistically significant at a P < .05 significance level. Results: The study found no significant differences between the groups’ pharyngeal airway and area measurements (P > .05). When the authors evaluated hyoid bone position, a statistically significant difference was found between the three groups’ Hy-A (mm), Hy-S (mm), Hy-SN (mm), and Hy-FH (mm) measurements (P < .05). Conclusion: Linear and areal pharyngeal airway dimensions are similar in subgroups of Class III malocclusions, while the hyoid bone is vertically higher in individuals with maxillary retrognathia.
比较III类骨骼错颌亚组咽气道尺寸和舌骨位置:一项头颅测量研究
目的:根据III类错牙合的亚群,观察咽气道的大小和舌骨的位置。材料和方法:本回顾性研究将骨骼III类错颌畸形患者分为三个亚组。该研究共包括151只个体(61只雌性和90只雄性)。作者将骨骼III类错颌患者分为三个亚组:上颌后颌畸形、下颌前颌畸形和合并。该研究的头部测量分析使用了8个鼻咽、7个口咽、2个下咽、9个舌骨和4个区域测量。采用单因素方差分析对患者进行评价。Tukey事后检验用于显著参数的双边比较。在P < 0.05显著水平上认为结果有统计学意义。结果:两组患者咽部气道及面积测量差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。当作者评估舌骨位置时,发现三组之间的Hy-A (mm), Hy-S (mm), Hy-SN (mm)和Hy-FH (mm)测量值具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:III类错颌亚群的咽气道线形和面形尺寸相似,而上颌后颌患者舌骨垂直方向较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Oral Research
Journal of Advanced Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信