Determination and calibration in the airway of the Mallampati, Patil-Aldreti tests, sternomentonian distance, interincisive distance

Reynaldo Mena Camejo, Y. Bazán, C. Sánchez, Kenya Dalia Leon Paz
{"title":"Determination and calibration in the airway of the Mallampati, Patil-Aldreti tests, sternomentonian distance, interincisive distance","authors":"Reynaldo Mena Camejo, Y. Bazán, C. Sánchez, Kenya Dalia Leon Paz","doi":"10.15406/JACCOA.2021.13.00468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An analytical, cross-sectional study was carried out in patients undergoing major elective surgery under general orotracheal anesthesia, at the \"Carlos Manuel de Céspedes\" University Provincial Hospital of Bayamo, in the period from January to December 2018, with the objective of evaluating the effectiveness of predictive tests of difficult intubation: Mallampati, Patil-Aldreti test, sternomentonian distance, and interincisive distance. For the calculation of the sample, the professional statistical program Epidemiological Analysis of Tabulated Data was applied, resulting in 269 patients, who were selected in the anesthesia office and applied the tests, after signing the informed consent. For the information processing, descriptive and inferential statistics were used. According to the Youden index, the interincisive distance was unsurpassed in effectiveness in all the tests performed, following the sternomentonian distance; The Mallampati test was the one with the lowest predictive value. Combinations of tests can increase the diagnostic value compared to the value of each test alone.","PeriodicalId":14916,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia & Critical Care: Open Access","volume":"118 1","pages":"47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia & Critical Care: Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/JACCOA.2021.13.00468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An analytical, cross-sectional study was carried out in patients undergoing major elective surgery under general orotracheal anesthesia, at the "Carlos Manuel de Céspedes" University Provincial Hospital of Bayamo, in the period from January to December 2018, with the objective of evaluating the effectiveness of predictive tests of difficult intubation: Mallampati, Patil-Aldreti test, sternomentonian distance, and interincisive distance. For the calculation of the sample, the professional statistical program Epidemiological Analysis of Tabulated Data was applied, resulting in 269 patients, who were selected in the anesthesia office and applied the tests, after signing the informed consent. For the information processing, descriptive and inferential statistics were used. According to the Youden index, the interincisive distance was unsurpassed in effectiveness in all the tests performed, following the sternomentonian distance; The Mallampati test was the one with the lowest predictive value. Combinations of tests can increase the diagnostic value compared to the value of each test alone.
气道内Mallampati、Patil-Aldreti试验、胸廓距离、切口间距离的测定与校准
本研究于2018年1月至12月在巴亚莫"Carlos Manuel de cacimesedes "大学省立医院对接受一般口气管麻醉的重大择期手术的患者进行了一项分析性横断面研究,目的是评估困难插管预测试验的有效性:Mallampati、Patil-Aldreti试验、胸廓距离和切口间距离。样本的计算采用专业统计程序《表列数据流行病学分析》,在麻醉办公室选择269例患者,签署知情同意书后进行测试。在信息处理方面,采用了描述统计和推理统计。根据约登指数,在所有进行的测试中,切内距离的有效性是无与伦比的,仅次于切内距离;Mallampati测试的预测价值最低。与单个检测相比,检测的组合可提高诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书