The legal nature of acts containing explanatory legislation and possessing normative qualities

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
E. S. Yusubov, Yuriy V. Philimonov
{"title":"The legal nature of acts containing explanatory legislation and possessing normative qualities","authors":"E. S. Yusubov, Yuriy V. Philimonov","doi":"10.17223/22253513/43/9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the administrative legal proceeding there was fixed right to litigate acts of public authority, organizations and officials, containing explanations of legislation and possessing regulatory characteristics. Authorizing to litigate these acts, the legislator realized suggestions, made earlier by scientists, about legalization of a separate type of act along with legal and individual acts, namely acts, which fix the result of legal interpretation of legal norms. The legislator cannot make specified regulation of all variety of public relations, established absolutely precise norms, falling under all events of life. Thereby in real situations law-enforcer can have some problems in understanding of several norms, which reproduce conditions to indefinitely wide limits of judgment and optional realization, at the same time it can lead to violation of rights and legal interests of participants of these legal relations. Mentioned circumstances caused state-authorized necessity in fulfillment of integrated practice of law-enforcement activity by means of edition of law expository acts. While explaining legal norms, it is not allowed to change, to expand or to restrict to their semantic meaning. Law explanation enforces, expands possibility of legal regulation, but it doesn’t actually influence on public relations and that is why administrative law explanatory acts are not applicable to the category of legal sources (form of fixation of legal norms). Contribution of the authors: the authors contributed equally to this article. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.","PeriodicalId":41435,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/43/9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the administrative legal proceeding there was fixed right to litigate acts of public authority, organizations and officials, containing explanations of legislation and possessing regulatory characteristics. Authorizing to litigate these acts, the legislator realized suggestions, made earlier by scientists, about legalization of a separate type of act along with legal and individual acts, namely acts, which fix the result of legal interpretation of legal norms. The legislator cannot make specified regulation of all variety of public relations, established absolutely precise norms, falling under all events of life. Thereby in real situations law-enforcer can have some problems in understanding of several norms, which reproduce conditions to indefinitely wide limits of judgment and optional realization, at the same time it can lead to violation of rights and legal interests of participants of these legal relations. Mentioned circumstances caused state-authorized necessity in fulfillment of integrated practice of law-enforcement activity by means of edition of law expository acts. While explaining legal norms, it is not allowed to change, to expand or to restrict to their semantic meaning. Law explanation enforces, expands possibility of legal regulation, but it doesn’t actually influence on public relations and that is why administrative law explanatory acts are not applicable to the category of legal sources (form of fixation of legal norms). Contribution of the authors: the authors contributed equally to this article. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
包含解释性立法并具有规范性质的行为的法律性质
在行政诉讼中,有对公共机关、组织和官员的行为提起诉讼的固定权利,其中包含立法解释并具有监管特征。授权对这些行为提起诉讼,立法者实现了科学家早先提出的关于将一种单独类型的行为与法律行为和个人行为一起合法化的建议,即行为,这些行为固定了法律规范的法律解释结果。立法者不可能对各种各样的公共关系作出具体的规定,建立绝对精确的、属于生活中所有事件的规范。因此,在现实情况下,执法者对若干规范的理解可能会出现一些问题,这些规范将条件复制到无限广泛的判断范围和可选的实现范围,同时也可能导致这些法律关系参与者的权利和法律利益受到侵犯。上述情形造成了国家授权的必要性,需要通过修订法律的说明性行为来实现执法活动的综合实践。在解释法律规范时,不允许改变、扩大或限制其语义含义。法律解释加强了法律规制的实施,扩大了法律规制的可能性,但实际上并没有对公共关系产生影响,因此行政法解释行为并不适用于法律渊源范畴(法律规范的固定形式)。作者的贡献:作者对本文的贡献是平等的。作者声明没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信