Service Quality and Wage Differentiation in Two-Sided Ridesharing Platforms

Haozhao Zhang, Chenglong Zhang, Srinivasan Raghunathan
{"title":"Service Quality and Wage Differentiation in Two-Sided Ridesharing Platforms","authors":"Haozhao Zhang, Chenglong Zhang, Srinivasan Raghunathan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3737241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the quality differentiation strategy, which is widely adopted by sellers in product markets, for a two-sided ridesharing platform that matches drivers with riders. The riders have different valuations for waiting time, which is one measure of service quality, and drivers have different service costs. Unlike product markets, the ridesharing platform faces a self-scheduled supply where drivers individually decide whether to offer their service and they may also be strategic in accepting a ride request. The platform can possibly use driver wage to control driver supply, but this, in turn, affects the service quality. We show that the ridesharing platform would offer quality-differentiated services only when the rider-side cannibalization is not high, which is consistent with findings in product markets. A platform that can control driver supply through wage has more incentive to offer quality-differentiated services than a platform that cannot if the rider-side cannibalization is low, but the reverse can happen if the rider-side cannibalization is moderate. In the presence of strategic drivers, offering differential wages to control driver supply leads to adverse effects from driver-side cannibalization as well. An increase in the driver-side cannibalization diminishes the platform's incentive to practice wage differentiation as well as the incentive to offer quality-differentiated services. On the other hand, an increase in the rider-side cannibalization can enhance the platform's incentive to practice wage differentiation.","PeriodicalId":13594,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems & Economics eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems & Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3737241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine the quality differentiation strategy, which is widely adopted by sellers in product markets, for a two-sided ridesharing platform that matches drivers with riders. The riders have different valuations for waiting time, which is one measure of service quality, and drivers have different service costs. Unlike product markets, the ridesharing platform faces a self-scheduled supply where drivers individually decide whether to offer their service and they may also be strategic in accepting a ride request. The platform can possibly use driver wage to control driver supply, but this, in turn, affects the service quality. We show that the ridesharing platform would offer quality-differentiated services only when the rider-side cannibalization is not high, which is consistent with findings in product markets. A platform that can control driver supply through wage has more incentive to offer quality-differentiated services than a platform that cannot if the rider-side cannibalization is low, but the reverse can happen if the rider-side cannibalization is moderate. In the presence of strategic drivers, offering differential wages to control driver supply leads to adverse effects from driver-side cannibalization as well. An increase in the driver-side cannibalization diminishes the platform's incentive to practice wage differentiation as well as the incentive to offer quality-differentiated services. On the other hand, an increase in the rider-side cannibalization can enhance the platform's incentive to practice wage differentiation.
双边拼车平台的服务质量与工资差异
我们研究了在产品市场中被卖家广泛采用的质量差异化策略,用于匹配司机和乘客的双边拼车平台。乘客对衡量服务质量的等待时间有不同的估价,司机有不同的服务成本。与产品市场不同,拼车平台面临着自行安排的供应,司机可以自行决定是否提供服务,他们也可能会有策略地接受乘车请求。平台可以通过司机工资来控制司机供给,但这反过来又影响了服务质量。我们发现,只有当乘客侧的同类相食不高时,拼车平台才会提供质量差异化的服务,这与产品市场的研究结果一致。一个可以通过工资来控制司机供给的平台比一个不能通过工资来控制司机供给的平台更有动力提供高质量的差异化服务,如果乘客侧的蚕食程度较低,但如果乘客侧的蚕食程度适中,则会发生相反的情况。在存在战略司机的情况下,通过提供差别工资来控制司机的供给也会导致司机侧同类相食的不利影响。司机侧自相残杀的增加削弱了平台实行工资差异化的动力,以及提供质量差异化服务的动力。另一方面,乘客侧自相残杀的增加可以增强平台实行工资差异化的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信