A learning method of trust building: beyond the performance management of artistic events

IF 2.3 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
J. Liboriussen, Hanne Nørreklit, Mihaela Trenca
{"title":"A learning method of trust building: beyond the performance management of artistic events","authors":"J. Liboriussen, Hanne Nørreklit, Mihaela Trenca","doi":"10.1108/qram-09-2019-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to address a dilemma raised in the accounting literature on how managers of creative practices can produce and use accounting measurements that support employees’ self-determination to create whilst also building trust in them to work for the interests of the organisation.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing pragmatic constructivism as a paradigmatic setting, the paper develops a learning method of trust building as a way for organisations to produce and use accounting measurements. Empirical analysis of the European Capital of Culture Aarhus 2017 demonstrates the method in action.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study displays a learning method of trust building as an effective way for organisations to account for their creative practices without intruding on the creative process of the people involved. The method involves proactive judgement and pragmatic observation of the trustworthiness of the actors’ language games, construction of quality in the conceptual structures of management narratives and measurement models, and learning that narrows the gap between the actors’ proactive judgement and the pragmatic observation of trustworthiness. Through such processes, including principles of truth, dialogical interactions, ongoing reflections and co-authorship, trust can be built in self-determining, creative actors to drive intentional results.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe learning method of trust building extends the literature on trust building and on knowledge processes of performance measurement of actors in creative practices.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is the first attempt in the accounting literature to develop a learning method of trust building.\n","PeriodicalId":46537,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qram-09-2019-0093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to address a dilemma raised in the accounting literature on how managers of creative practices can produce and use accounting measurements that support employees’ self-determination to create whilst also building trust in them to work for the interests of the organisation. Design/methodology/approach Using pragmatic constructivism as a paradigmatic setting, the paper develops a learning method of trust building as a way for organisations to produce and use accounting measurements. Empirical analysis of the European Capital of Culture Aarhus 2017 demonstrates the method in action. Findings The study displays a learning method of trust building as an effective way for organisations to account for their creative practices without intruding on the creative process of the people involved. The method involves proactive judgement and pragmatic observation of the trustworthiness of the actors’ language games, construction of quality in the conceptual structures of management narratives and measurement models, and learning that narrows the gap between the actors’ proactive judgement and the pragmatic observation of trustworthiness. Through such processes, including principles of truth, dialogical interactions, ongoing reflections and co-authorship, trust can be built in self-determining, creative actors to drive intentional results. Research limitations/implications The learning method of trust building extends the literature on trust building and on knowledge processes of performance measurement of actors in creative practices. Originality/value This is the first attempt in the accounting literature to develop a learning method of trust building.
一种建立信任的学习方法:超越艺术活动的表演管理
本文旨在解决会计文献中提出的一个困境,即创造性实践的管理者如何能够产生和使用支持员工自决创造的会计度量,同时也建立对他们为组织利益工作的信任。设计/方法/方法使用实用主义建构主义作为范式设置,本文开发了一种建立信任的学习方法,作为组织生产和使用会计计量的一种方式。对2017年欧洲文化之都奥胡斯的实证分析证明了该方法的有效性。研究结果表明,建立信任的学习方法是一种有效的方法,可以让组织在不干扰相关人员的创造过程的情况下解释他们的创造性实践。该方法包括对行为者语言游戏中可信度的主动判断和语用观察,在管理叙事和测量模型的概念结构中构建质量,以及缩小行为者的主动判断和可信度的语用观察之间差距的学习。通过这些过程,包括真理原则、对话互动、持续反思和共同创作,可以在自主、有创造力的行动者中建立信任,以推动有意的结果。研究局限/启示信任建立的学习方法扩展了信任建立的文献和创造性实践中行为者绩效测量的知识过程。原创性/价值这是会计文献中第一次尝试建立信任的学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
31.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management is an international journal that promotes qualitative research at the interface of accounting and management. The journal encourages the assessment of practices in the accounting field through a variety of theoretical lenses, and seeks to further our knowledge of the accounting-management nexus in its broadest (e.g., organisational, social and political) contexts. QRAM welcomes submissions of original research papers, conceptual pieces, substantive review articles, and shorter papers such as comments or research notes. The following is intended to indicate potential topics, but is by no means prescriptive. These topics can be overlapping rather than discrete subject areas, and researchers should not feel restricted by the scope of the topics listed below. • Management accounting and control • Accountability, transition and organisational change • Performance management and accounting metrics • Accounting for strategic management • The use and behavioural effects of accounting information in organisational decision-making • Public and third sector accounting and management • Accounting and management controls for sustainability and the environment • Historical perspectives on the accounting-management interface • Methods and methodologies for research at the interface of accounting and management • Accounting and management in developing countries and emerging economies • Technology effects on accounting-management dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信