Core outcome set for stable angina pectoris in traditional Chinese medicine (COS-SAP-TCM)

Mingyan Zhang, Junhua Zhang, H. Chua, Rui Feng, Meijuan Lu, Ying Tian
{"title":"Core outcome set for stable angina pectoris in traditional Chinese medicine (COS-SAP-TCM)","authors":"Mingyan Zhang, Junhua Zhang, H. Chua, Rui Feng, Meijuan Lu, Ying Tian","doi":"10.1097/HM9.0000000000000007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: This study aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) for use in future studies of stable angina pectoris (SAP) in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Methods: Systematic literature reviews and qualitative interviews with cardiologists and patients with SAP treated using TCM were conducted to generate a set of outcomes. Outcomes were prioritized by stakeholders via two rounds of an online Delphi survey and face-to-face consensus meetings. Following the final consensus meeting, a final COS was generated. Results: An initial set of 324 outcomes was identified. A preliminary list of 65 outcomes was employed in the Delphi study. In total, 223 participants from seven stakeholder groups were invited to score outcomes in the first Delphi round: 87 completed round 1 and 47 completed round 2. Thirty-one participants attended the consensus meeting and agreed on a final core set of outcomes comprising six items across four domains: frequency of angina attack, duration of angina attack, Seattle angina questionnaire, total exercise duration in the exercise treadmill test, cardiovascular events, and QT interval on electrocardiography. Conclusions: The COS developed in this study provides the minimum requirements for measurement and reporting in future TCM clinical trials for the treatment of SAP. The employment of this COS may reduce heterogeneity across trials and facilitate evidence-based decision-making for stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":93856,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture and herbal medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture and herbal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HM9.0000000000000007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract Objective: This study aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) for use in future studies of stable angina pectoris (SAP) in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Methods: Systematic literature reviews and qualitative interviews with cardiologists and patients with SAP treated using TCM were conducted to generate a set of outcomes. Outcomes were prioritized by stakeholders via two rounds of an online Delphi survey and face-to-face consensus meetings. Following the final consensus meeting, a final COS was generated. Results: An initial set of 324 outcomes was identified. A preliminary list of 65 outcomes was employed in the Delphi study. In total, 223 participants from seven stakeholder groups were invited to score outcomes in the first Delphi round: 87 completed round 1 and 47 completed round 2. Thirty-one participants attended the consensus meeting and agreed on a final core set of outcomes comprising six items across four domains: frequency of angina attack, duration of angina attack, Seattle angina questionnaire, total exercise duration in the exercise treadmill test, cardiovascular events, and QT interval on electrocardiography. Conclusions: The COS developed in this study provides the minimum requirements for measurement and reporting in future TCM clinical trials for the treatment of SAP. The employment of this COS may reduce heterogeneity across trials and facilitate evidence-based decision-making for stakeholders.
中医稳定性心绞痛的核心结局集(COS-SAP-TCM)
摘要目的:本研究旨在建立一个核心结局集(COS),用于未来中医稳定性心绞痛(SAP)的研究。方法:通过系统的文献回顾和对心脏科医生和使用中医治疗SAP的患者进行定性访谈,得出一组结果。利益相关者通过两轮在线德尔菲调查和面对面的共识会议来确定结果的优先顺序。在最后的共识会议之后,产生了最后的COS。结果:初步确定了324个结果。德尔菲研究采用了65项初步结果。总共有来自7个利益相关者群体的223名参与者被邀请在第一轮德尔菲中对结果进行评分:87人完成了第一轮,47人完成了第二轮。31名参与者参加了共识会议,并就最终的核心结果集达成一致,包括四个领域的六个项目:心绞痛发作频率、心绞痛发作持续时间、西雅图心绞痛问卷、运动跑步机试验中的总运动时间、心血管事件和心电图QT间期。结论:本研究开发的COS为未来中医临床试验中SAP治疗的测量和报告提供了最低要求。该COS的使用可以减少试验之间的异质性,促进利益相关者的循证决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信