Fairness in language assessment: What can the Rasch model offer?

IF 0.1 Q4 LINGUISTICS
Jason Fan, U. Knoch
{"title":"Fairness in language assessment: What can the Rasch model offer?","authors":"Jason Fan, U. Knoch","doi":"10.58379/jrwg5233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing upon discussions of fairness in the field of language assessment, this systematic review study explores how the Rasch model has been used to investigate and enhance fairness in language assessment. To that end, we collected and systematically reviewed the empirical studies that used the Rasch model, published in four leading journals in the field from 2000 to 2018. A total of 139 articles were collected and subsequently coded in NVivo 11, using the open coding method. In addition, matrix coding analysis was implemented to explore the relationship between the topics that were identified and the language constructs that constituted the focus of the collected articles. Five broad themes were extracted from the coding process, including: 1) rater effects; 2) language test design and evaluation; 3) differential group performance; 4) evaluation of rating criteria, and 5) standard setting. Representative studies under each category were used to illustrate how the Rasch model was utilised to investigate test fairness. Findings of this study have important implications for language assessment development and evaluation. In addition, the findings also identified a few avenues in the application of the Rasch model which language assessment researchers should explore in future studies.","PeriodicalId":29650,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language Assessment","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58379/jrwg5233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Drawing upon discussions of fairness in the field of language assessment, this systematic review study explores how the Rasch model has been used to investigate and enhance fairness in language assessment. To that end, we collected and systematically reviewed the empirical studies that used the Rasch model, published in four leading journals in the field from 2000 to 2018. A total of 139 articles were collected and subsequently coded in NVivo 11, using the open coding method. In addition, matrix coding analysis was implemented to explore the relationship between the topics that were identified and the language constructs that constituted the focus of the collected articles. Five broad themes were extracted from the coding process, including: 1) rater effects; 2) language test design and evaluation; 3) differential group performance; 4) evaluation of rating criteria, and 5) standard setting. Representative studies under each category were used to illustrate how the Rasch model was utilised to investigate test fairness. Findings of this study have important implications for language assessment development and evaluation. In addition, the findings also identified a few avenues in the application of the Rasch model which language assessment researchers should explore in future studies.
语言评估的公平性:Rasch模型能提供什么?
借鉴语言评估领域关于公平性的讨论,本系统回顾研究探讨了如何使用Rasch模型来调查和提高语言评估中的公平性。为此,我们收集并系统地回顾了使用Rasch模型的实证研究,这些研究发表在2000年至2018年该领域的四本主要期刊上。共收集139篇文献,在NVivo 11中采用开放编码方法进行编码。此外,采用矩阵编码分析来探索识别的主题与构成收集文章重点的语言结构之间的关系。从编码过程中提取了五大主题,包括:1)比例效应;2)语言测试设计与评价;3)差异组绩效;4)评估评级标准;5)制定标准。每个类别下的代表性研究被用来说明如何利用Rasch模型来调查测试公平性。本研究结果对语言评估的发展和评价具有重要意义。此外,研究结果还确定了Rasch模型应用的一些途径,这些途径是语言评估研究者在未来的研究中应该探索的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信