Rikako Aoki, H. Kida, Kana Okada, Yoshitaka Kikuchi, M. Kawasaki, S. Tamaki, Yoshiro Furukawa, Tetsuya Watanabe, Takahisa Yamada
{"title":"Timing of Atrial Fibrillation Occurrence in Hemodialysis Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices","authors":"Rikako Aoki, H. Kida, Kana Okada, Yoshitaka Kikuchi, M. Kawasaki, S. Tamaki, Yoshiro Furukawa, Tetsuya Watanabe, Takahisa Yamada","doi":"10.5105/jse.41.134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Hemodialysis (HD) patients has the high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), and the procedure of HD itself might be related to risk factors for the onset of AF. On the other hand, cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), such as pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have the function for arrhythmia detection. However, in HD patients with CIEDs, there are no studies that observe AF over long periods of time. The aim of this study is to investigate AF onset and duration of HD patients with AF, using the AF detection and memory function of CIEDs.\n \n \n \n Consecutive HD patients who were newly implanted with CIEDs between January 2008 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Patients with chronic AF, with leadless pacemaker and without post-implantation follow-up were excluded from this study. Subclinical AF was defined from previous studies as atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting more than 6 minutes in memories of devices. The primary endpoint of this study was the subclinical AF within one year after CIESDs implantation. HD week was defined as follows according to HD schedule, HD1: Monday or Tuesday; HD1+1: Tuesday or Wednesday; HD2 Wednesday or Thursday; HD2+1 Thursday or Friday; HD3 Friday or Saturday; HD3+1 as Saturday or Sunday; and HD3+2 Sunday or Monday. We examined the association between onset and duration of AF and HD.\n \n \n \n Fifty-four HD patients who had been implanted with CIEDs (pacemaker: 37, ICD: 6, CRT: 11) were enrolled in the study. During a mean follow-up period of 352 ± 36 days, in 26 of 54 (48.1%) patients, 124 subclinical AF events (1-8 events / patient) were detected with CIEDs. History of clinical AF (46.2% vs 7.1%, p = 0.003) and sick sinus syndrome (53.8% vs 10.7%, p = 0.005) were significantly higher in HD patients with than without subclinical AF. The frequency of subclinical AF onset on HD day was approximately twice higher than on non-HD day (83 episodes [27.7 episodes/day] vs 41 episodes [10.3 episodes/day]), and subclinical AF onset on HD1 day was most frequent among a week (Figure 1a). Limited to HD day, subclinical AF events were observed more frequently especially during HD (30/86 events: 34.9%) and five hours after HD (28/86 events: 32.6%) (Fig. 1-b). Subclinical AF duration was significantly longer during HD compared to non-HD time (216 [90, 1066] min vs 96 [30, 418] min, p = 0.008).\n \n \n \n In HD patients, subclinical AF occurred more frequently on HD day, especially during HD and several hours after HD. Careful observation during and after HD might help early diagnosis of clinical AF.\n","PeriodicalId":14543,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Electrocardiology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5105/jse.41.134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hemodialysis (HD) patients has the high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), and the procedure of HD itself might be related to risk factors for the onset of AF. On the other hand, cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), such as pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have the function for arrhythmia detection. However, in HD patients with CIEDs, there are no studies that observe AF over long periods of time. The aim of this study is to investigate AF onset and duration of HD patients with AF, using the AF detection and memory function of CIEDs.
Consecutive HD patients who were newly implanted with CIEDs between January 2008 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Patients with chronic AF, with leadless pacemaker and without post-implantation follow-up were excluded from this study. Subclinical AF was defined from previous studies as atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting more than 6 minutes in memories of devices. The primary endpoint of this study was the subclinical AF within one year after CIESDs implantation. HD week was defined as follows according to HD schedule, HD1: Monday or Tuesday; HD1+1: Tuesday or Wednesday; HD2 Wednesday or Thursday; HD2+1 Thursday or Friday; HD3 Friday or Saturday; HD3+1 as Saturday or Sunday; and HD3+2 Sunday or Monday. We examined the association between onset and duration of AF and HD.
Fifty-four HD patients who had been implanted with CIEDs (pacemaker: 37, ICD: 6, CRT: 11) were enrolled in the study. During a mean follow-up period of 352 ± 36 days, in 26 of 54 (48.1%) patients, 124 subclinical AF events (1-8 events / patient) were detected with CIEDs. History of clinical AF (46.2% vs 7.1%, p = 0.003) and sick sinus syndrome (53.8% vs 10.7%, p = 0.005) were significantly higher in HD patients with than without subclinical AF. The frequency of subclinical AF onset on HD day was approximately twice higher than on non-HD day (83 episodes [27.7 episodes/day] vs 41 episodes [10.3 episodes/day]), and subclinical AF onset on HD1 day was most frequent among a week (Figure 1a). Limited to HD day, subclinical AF events were observed more frequently especially during HD (30/86 events: 34.9%) and five hours after HD (28/86 events: 32.6%) (Fig. 1-b). Subclinical AF duration was significantly longer during HD compared to non-HD time (216 [90, 1066] min vs 96 [30, 418] min, p = 0.008).
In HD patients, subclinical AF occurred more frequently on HD day, especially during HD and several hours after HD. Careful observation during and after HD might help early diagnosis of clinical AF.
血液透析(HD)患者心房颤动(AF)的发生率较高,其治疗过程本身可能与AF发病的危险因素有关。另一方面,心脏植入式电子装置(CIEDs)如起搏器、植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)、心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)等具有检测心律失常的功能。然而,在HD合并cied的患者中,没有长期观察房颤的研究。本研究的目的是利用cied的AF检测和记忆功能,探讨HD合并AF患者的AF发作和持续时间。本研究回顾性分析了2008年1月至2021年12月期间连续植入cied的HD患者。慢性房颤、无导联起搏器和无植入后随访的患者被排除在本研究之外。根据先前的研究,亚临床房颤被定义为在设备记忆中持续超过6分钟的房性心动过速。本研究的主要终点是CIESDs植入后一年内的亚临床房颤。HD周根据HD时间表定义如下,HD1:周一或周二;HD1+1:周二或周三;HD2周三或周四;HD2+1星期四或星期五;HD3星期五或星期六;HD3+1为星期六或星期日;和HD3+2周日或周一。我们研究了房颤和HD的发病和持续时间之间的关系。54例植入cied的HD患者(起搏器37例,ICD 6例,CRT 11例)被纳入研究。在平均352±36天的随访期间,54例患者中有26例(48.1%)发生了124次亚临床AF事件(1-8次/例)。伴有亚临床房颤的HD患者的临床房颤史(46.2% vs 7.1%, p = 0.003)和病态窦综合征(53.8% vs 10.7%, p = 0.005)显著高于无亚临床房颤的患者。HD当天亚临床房颤发作的频率约为非HD当天的两倍(83次[27.7次/天]vs 41次[10.3次/天]),并且在一周内HD1日亚临床房颤发作最频繁(图1a)。限于HD日,亚临床房颤事件的观察频率更高,特别是HD期间(30/86事件:34.9%)和HD后5小时(28/86事件:32.6%)(图1-b)。HD患者的亚临床房颤持续时间明显长于非HD患者(216 [90,1066]min vs 96 [30,418] min, p = 0.008)。在HD患者中,亚临床房颤在HD当天发生的频率更高,尤其是在HD期间和HD后的几个小时。在HD期间和之后仔细观察可能有助于临床AF的早期诊断。