Epistemología implícita en el código de ética profesional del colegio de psicólogos de Chile

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY

Cinta de Moebio Pub Date : 2019-04-03 DOI:10.4067/S0717-554X2019000100051

A. Cifuentes-Muñoz

引用次数: 6

Abstract

espanolResumen: Este articulo pretende develar los supuestos epistemologicos que se encuentran implicitos en el codigo deontologico del Colegio de Psicologos de Chile. Para resolver tal problema se realiza un analisis de discurso que abarca la interpretacion del contenido del documento, del contexto en el que se inserta y de los actores involucrados. El analisis sugiere que el codigo de etica se sustenta implicita y sustancialmente en el paradigma positivista de la ciencia, al alero de la modernidad como contexto. Finalmente, se senalan algunas implicancias y reflexiones en torno a tales hallazgos. EnglishAbstract: This paper has like objective to reveal the epistemological assumptions implicit into of ethics code of the psychologists' school of Chile. To solve this problem was used an analysis of discourse on the content of the code, the context and the actors involved. The results of the analysis show that positivism is the paradigm that supports epistemologically the code, next to modernity like context. Finally, some implications and reflexions are pointed out around the findings.

查看原文本刊更多论文

智利心理学家学院职业道德规范中的隐含认识论

摘要:本文旨在揭示智利心理学家学院道德规范中隐含的认识论假设。为了解决这个问题，我们进行了话语分析，包括对文件内容的解释、插入文件的上下文和涉及的参与者。本研究的目的是分析伦理规范在实证主义科学范式中隐含和本质上的支持，在现代性作为背景的背景下。最后，对这些发现提出了一些暗示和反思。EnglishAbstract: This paper你像目标弄清epistemological assumptions implicit into of ethics code of the psychologists智利“学院。为了解决这一问题，对《治罪法》的内容、背景和所涉行动者进行了论述分析。分析结果显示,positivism is范式that supports epistemologically The code, next to modernity像context。最后，围绕这些发现提出了一些暗示和反思。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cinta de Moebio PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.