Modelling pricing, vertical co-op advertising and quality improvement in a non-cooperative three-echelon supply chain using game theory approach

IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Razieh Shoeleh, M. Seifbarghy, D. Pishva
{"title":"Modelling pricing, vertical co-op advertising and quality improvement in a non-cooperative three-echelon supply chain using game theory approach","authors":"Razieh Shoeleh, M. Seifbarghy, D. Pishva","doi":"10.1051/RO/2018109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vertical cooperative (co-op) advertising is one of the well-known mechanisms for coordination of supply chains. Vertical co-op advertising is a financial agreement in which a member of the chain pays certain percentage (i.e. cooperation rate) of a subsequent member’s advertisement cost. Since increasing the number of echelons and decision variables in supply chain problems increase the modelling and computational complexity, most researchers study vertical co-op advertising in a two-level supply chain including a manufacturer and a retailer. This paper investigates the problem by considering price and quality levels as additional decision variables in a three-echelon supply chain consisting of one supplier, one manufacturer, and one retailer. The ultimate goal is to show supply chain managers the importance of product quality as well the role of local advertisement in positively influencing market demand on top of the traditional approach of speed and efficiency optimization. Using game theory approach, power of the manufacturer is assumed to be higher than or equal to those of others in the chain. Five different relationships between players are considered in five non-cooperative games (named as G1–G5) and equilibrium solutions are extracted for each. The results show that the manufacturer prefers to play Stackelberg with the retailer and the supplier rather than be in conflict with them in Nash game. Such preference can lead manufacturer towards high quality and cost-efficient product/service via efficient advertisement in our complex network of business firms.","PeriodicalId":54509,"journal":{"name":"Rairo-Operations Research","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rairo-Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/RO/2018109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Vertical cooperative (co-op) advertising is one of the well-known mechanisms for coordination of supply chains. Vertical co-op advertising is a financial agreement in which a member of the chain pays certain percentage (i.e. cooperation rate) of a subsequent member’s advertisement cost. Since increasing the number of echelons and decision variables in supply chain problems increase the modelling and computational complexity, most researchers study vertical co-op advertising in a two-level supply chain including a manufacturer and a retailer. This paper investigates the problem by considering price and quality levels as additional decision variables in a three-echelon supply chain consisting of one supplier, one manufacturer, and one retailer. The ultimate goal is to show supply chain managers the importance of product quality as well the role of local advertisement in positively influencing market demand on top of the traditional approach of speed and efficiency optimization. Using game theory approach, power of the manufacturer is assumed to be higher than or equal to those of others in the chain. Five different relationships between players are considered in five non-cooperative games (named as G1–G5) and equilibrium solutions are extracted for each. The results show that the manufacturer prefers to play Stackelberg with the retailer and the supplier rather than be in conflict with them in Nash game. Such preference can lead manufacturer towards high quality and cost-efficient product/service via efficient advertisement in our complex network of business firms.
基于博弈论的非合作三层供应链定价、垂直合作广告和质量改进建模
垂直合作广告是众所周知的供应链协调机制之一。垂直合作广告是一种财务协议,其中连锁成员支付一定比例(即合作率)的后续成员的广告成本。由于供应链问题中越来越多的层次和决策变量增加了建模和计算的复杂性,大多数研究者研究了包括制造商和零售商在内的两层供应链中的垂直合作广告。本文在一个由一个供应商、一个制造商和一个零售商组成的三层供应链中,将价格和质量水平作为附加决策变量来研究这一问题。最终目标是向供应链管理者展示产品质量的重要性,以及在速度和效率优化的传统方法之上,本地广告在积极影响市场需求方面的作用。利用博弈论的方法,假设制造商的权力大于或等于链中其他厂商的权力。在5个非合作博弈(G1-G5)中,考虑了参与者之间的5种不同关系,并为每种关系提取了均衡解。结果表明,在纳什博弈中,制造商更倾向于与零售商和供应商玩Stackelberg游戏,而不是与他们发生冲突。这种偏好可以通过在我们复杂的商业公司网络中有效的广告引导制造商获得高质量和成本效益的产品/服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rairo-Operations Research
Rairo-Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
206
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: RAIRO-Operations Research is an international journal devoted to high-level pure and applied research on all aspects of operations research. All papers published in RAIRO-Operations Research are critically refereed according to international standards. Any paper will either be accepted (possibly with minor revisions) either submitted to another evaluation (after a major revision) or rejected. Every effort will be made by the Editorial Board to ensure a first answer concerning a submitted paper within three months, and a final decision in a period of time not exceeding six months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信