Collective forestry regimes to enhance transition to climate smart forestry

IF 3 3区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Stanislava Brnkalakova, Mariana Melnykovych, Maria Nijnik, Carla Barlagne, Marian Pavelka, Andrej Udovc, Michal Marek, Urban Kovac, Tatiana Kluvánková
{"title":"Collective forestry regimes to enhance transition to climate smart forestry","authors":"Stanislava Brnkalakova,&nbsp;Mariana Melnykovych,&nbsp;Maria Nijnik,&nbsp;Carla Barlagne,&nbsp;Marian Pavelka,&nbsp;Andrej Udovc,&nbsp;Michal Marek,&nbsp;Urban Kovac,&nbsp;Tatiana Kluvánková","doi":"10.1002/eet.2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As European mountain forests are a significant world carbon stock and sequester, they have a prominent position in climate policies and climate smart forestry (CSF) implementation. However, forest ecosystem services (ES) that are public or common goods (i.e., of carbon sequestration) face a traditional social dilemma of individual versus collective interests, which often generate conflicts, and result in the overuse of ES and resource depletion. In this article, we elaborate a conceptual analytical framework and use it in case studies selected in European mountain areas to analyse the potential of socio-ecological systems to develop CSF. Collective self-organized forestry regimes, as a form of social innovation, are the main focus, compared with centrally governed state regimes and forest management practices in municipal forests. A conceptual framework to analyse collective self-organized regimes and compare these with other CSF-applicable forestry regimes is elaborated using a mixed-method approach, centered around the estimation of carbon sequestration potential. The results indicate that collective self-organized forestry regimes can play a role in fostering the transition of European forestry towards CSF.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"32 6","pages":"492-503"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.2021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

As European mountain forests are a significant world carbon stock and sequester, they have a prominent position in climate policies and climate smart forestry (CSF) implementation. However, forest ecosystem services (ES) that are public or common goods (i.e., of carbon sequestration) face a traditional social dilemma of individual versus collective interests, which often generate conflicts, and result in the overuse of ES and resource depletion. In this article, we elaborate a conceptual analytical framework and use it in case studies selected in European mountain areas to analyse the potential of socio-ecological systems to develop CSF. Collective self-organized forestry regimes, as a form of social innovation, are the main focus, compared with centrally governed state regimes and forest management practices in municipal forests. A conceptual framework to analyse collective self-organized regimes and compare these with other CSF-applicable forestry regimes is elaborated using a mixed-method approach, centered around the estimation of carbon sequestration potential. The results indicate that collective self-organized forestry regimes can play a role in fostering the transition of European forestry towards CSF.

加强向气候智能型林业过渡的集体林业制度
由于欧洲山林是世界上重要的碳储量和碳汇,它们在气候政策和气候智慧型林业(CSF)实施中具有突出地位。然而,森林生态系统服务作为公共或共同利益(即碳固存),面临着个人利益与集体利益的传统社会困境,这往往会产生冲突,并导致森林生态系统服务的过度使用和资源枯竭。在本文中,我们阐述了一个概念性分析框架,并将其用于在欧洲山区选择的案例研究中,以分析社会生态系统发展CSF的潜力。与中央管理的国家制度和城市森林的森林管理做法相比,集体自组织的森林制度作为一种社会创新形式是主要焦点。以估计碳固存潜力为中心,采用混合方法拟订了一个概念框架,分析集体自组织制度,并将这些制度与其他适用于世界自然基金的林业制度进行比较。研究结果表明,集体自组织林业制度可以在促进欧洲林业向CSF过渡中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Policy and Governance
Environmental Policy and Governance ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Environmental Policy and Governance is an international, inter-disciplinary journal affiliated with the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE). The journal seeks to advance interdisciplinary environmental research and its use to support novel solutions in environmental policy and governance. The journal publishes innovative, high quality articles which examine, or are relevant to, the environmental policies that are introduced by governments or the diverse forms of environmental governance that emerge in markets and civil society. The journal includes papers that examine how different forms of policy and governance emerge and exert influence at scales ranging from local to global and in diverse developmental and environmental contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信