DUPLICITY IN REGULATION AND PERFORMANCE OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR IN KENYA

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Dr.Agnes Ogada
{"title":"DUPLICITY IN REGULATION AND PERFORMANCE OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR IN KENYA","authors":"Dr.Agnes Ogada","doi":"10.47941/IJF.553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The objective of the study was to investigate the duplicity in regulation and performance of the financial sector in Kenya. The specific objectives were; to review and identify regulation duplication/competition in existing regulatory framework for the financial sector in Kenya; to describe how regulatory effectiveness has been measured in empirical literature; to assess whether the current regulatory structure has affected the performance of the financial sector in Kenya and lastly to suggest potential ways of enhancing regulatory effectiveness in Kenya.\nMethodology: The paper used a desk study review methodology where relevant empirical literature was reviewed to identify main themes and to extract knowledge gaps.\nFindings: The study found out that financial sector in Kenya and other developing economies have reported losses on a large scale due to under regulation and regulator duplicity. Some of these have become insolvent, or have had to be taken over or rescued by their governments. A single market regulator clearly has its own advantages over multiple regulators. But it is more suitable for well-developed and mature markets which are smaller in size, like the UK. The study also found out that Kenya’s economy and political arena are not mature enough to handle a single financial market regulator. In this light it can be asserted that even mature economies such as the United States still have multiple regulators.\nUnique contribution to theory, practice and policy: Adherence to principles of open government, including transparency and participation in the regulatory process to ensure that regulation serves the public interest and is informed by the legitimate needs of those interested in and affected by regulation. Governments should ensure that regulations are comprehensible and clear and that parties can easily understand their rights and obligations. Organizations should create personalized technology systems that create a demand adaptation of ICT at every level of the organizational operations","PeriodicalId":53549,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance","volume":"110 1","pages":"39-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/IJF.553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of the study was to investigate the duplicity in regulation and performance of the financial sector in Kenya. The specific objectives were; to review and identify regulation duplication/competition in existing regulatory framework for the financial sector in Kenya; to describe how regulatory effectiveness has been measured in empirical literature; to assess whether the current regulatory structure has affected the performance of the financial sector in Kenya and lastly to suggest potential ways of enhancing regulatory effectiveness in Kenya. Methodology: The paper used a desk study review methodology where relevant empirical literature was reviewed to identify main themes and to extract knowledge gaps. Findings: The study found out that financial sector in Kenya and other developing economies have reported losses on a large scale due to under regulation and regulator duplicity. Some of these have become insolvent, or have had to be taken over or rescued by their governments. A single market regulator clearly has its own advantages over multiple regulators. But it is more suitable for well-developed and mature markets which are smaller in size, like the UK. The study also found out that Kenya’s economy and political arena are not mature enough to handle a single financial market regulator. In this light it can be asserted that even mature economies such as the United States still have multiple regulators. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: Adherence to principles of open government, including transparency and participation in the regulatory process to ensure that regulation serves the public interest and is informed by the legitimate needs of those interested in and affected by regulation. Governments should ensure that regulations are comprehensible and clear and that parties can easily understand their rights and obligations. Organizations should create personalized technology systems that create a demand adaptation of ICT at every level of the organizational operations
肯尼亚金融部门的监管和绩效表里不一
目的:本研究的目的是调查肯尼亚金融部门监管和绩效的表里不一。具体目标是;审查和确定肯尼亚金融部门现有监管框架中的监管重复/竞争;描述如何在实证文献中衡量监管有效性;评估当前的监管结构是否影响了肯尼亚金融部门的表现,最后提出提高肯尼亚监管效率的潜在方法。研究方法:本文采用桌面研究回顾方法,对相关的实证文献进行回顾,以确定主题并提取知识空白。研究结果:研究发现,肯尼亚和其他发展中经济体的金融部门由于监管不力和监管机构表里不一而出现了大规模亏损。其中一些已经资不抵债,或者不得不由政府接管或救助。与多个监管机构相比,单一市场监管机构显然有其自身的优势。但它更适合于发达、成熟、规模较小的市场,比如英国。该研究还发现,肯尼亚的经济和政治舞台还不够成熟,无法应对单一的金融市场监管机构。从这个角度来看,可以断言,即使是像美国这样成熟的经济体也仍然有多个监管机构。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:坚持开放政府的原则,包括透明度和参与监管过程,以确保监管服务于公众利益,并根据那些对监管感兴趣和受监管影响的人的合法需求提供信息。各国政府应确保法规是可理解和明确的,各方可以很容易地了解他们的权利和义务。组织应该创建个性化的技术系统,在组织运作的每一个层面创造对ICT的需求适应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance
International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信