Interaction of Public Authorities in Strategic Planning

Q2 Social Sciences
I. Belyaev, S. A. Pobyvaev, S. Silvestrov
{"title":"Interaction of Public Authorities in Strategic Planning","authors":"I. Belyaev, S. A. Pobyvaev, S. Silvestrov","doi":"10.26794/2304-022x-2022-12-4-36-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the paper is determined by the authors’ intentions to solve the problems of national economic strategy to a greater extent than issues of purely academic interest, since the effectiveness of domestic strategic planning, despite the efforts actively made to organize this process, including in terms of legal regulation, is clearly insufficient. The principal method of research is the comparison of existing legislative provisions with each other, with elements of foreign experience and with the actual state of things, and their linking into a single logic. The authors analyzed system and tactical problems of the strategic planning and management, considering the involvement of public authorities in this process. System problems include the absence of both a hierarchy of documents and an analytical planning entity of high capacity, as well as a lack of performers’ competencies. Tactical problems include the unsatisfactory state of affairs at the municipal level and the overload of the strategic planning system of inferior quality documents. The primary task of the study is to determine the fundamental ways to resolve systemic and tactical problems. Separately, the authors highlight an importance of introducing the public authority legal category that is going to synchronize strategies of all its levels in the future. Based on the analysis of the internal logic of the development of a strategic planning and management system, as well as the best practices of foreign experience, the authors conclude that the state system of strategic audit. According to the results of the study, this system is inadequate to the tasks of effective implementation of the state strategy. Also, the authors concluded the need for digitalization of strategic planning to reconstruct existing connections, methods of interaction and the use of new, informational analysis methods. The practical significance of the research is determined by the possibility of applying the authors’ recommendations being in the normative regulation of the process of domestic strategic planning and management.","PeriodicalId":35958,"journal":{"name":"Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022x-2022-12-4-36-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the paper is determined by the authors’ intentions to solve the problems of national economic strategy to a greater extent than issues of purely academic interest, since the effectiveness of domestic strategic planning, despite the efforts actively made to organize this process, including in terms of legal regulation, is clearly insufficient. The principal method of research is the comparison of existing legislative provisions with each other, with elements of foreign experience and with the actual state of things, and their linking into a single logic. The authors analyzed system and tactical problems of the strategic planning and management, considering the involvement of public authorities in this process. System problems include the absence of both a hierarchy of documents and an analytical planning entity of high capacity, as well as a lack of performers’ competencies. Tactical problems include the unsatisfactory state of affairs at the municipal level and the overload of the strategic planning system of inferior quality documents. The primary task of the study is to determine the fundamental ways to resolve systemic and tactical problems. Separately, the authors highlight an importance of introducing the public authority legal category that is going to synchronize strategies of all its levels in the future. Based on the analysis of the internal logic of the development of a strategic planning and management system, as well as the best practices of foreign experience, the authors conclude that the state system of strategic audit. According to the results of the study, this system is inadequate to the tasks of effective implementation of the state strategy. Also, the authors concluded the need for digitalization of strategic planning to reconstruct existing connections, methods of interaction and the use of new, informational analysis methods. The practical significance of the research is determined by the possibility of applying the authors’ recommendations being in the normative regulation of the process of domestic strategic planning and management.
公共权力机构在战略规划中的互动
这篇论文的相关性取决于作者在更大程度上解决国家经济战略问题的意图,而不是纯粹的学术兴趣问题,因为尽管为组织这一进程作出了积极努力,但国内战略规划的有效性,包括在法律法规方面,显然是不足的。研究的主要方法是将现有的立法规定相互比较,将其与国外经验因素和实际情况进行比较,并将它们联系到一个单一的逻辑中。考虑到公共当局的介入,作者分析了战略规划和管理的体制和战术问题。系统问题包括缺乏文件等级制度和高能力的分析规划实体,以及缺乏执行者的能力。战术问题包括市级形势不理想和劣质文件的战略规划系统超载。研究的首要任务是确定解决系统性和战术性问题的根本途径。另外,作者强调了引入公共权力法律类别的重要性,该类别将在未来同步其所有级别的战略。本文在分析战略规划管理体系发展的内在逻辑的基础上,借鉴国外的最佳实践经验,得出国家战略审计体系的发展方向。研究结果表明,这一制度不足以胜任有效实施国家战略的任务。此外,作者还总结了战略规划数字化的必要性,以重建现有的联系、互动方法和使用新的信息分析方法。本研究的现实意义在于,作者的建议是否有可能应用于国内战略规划和管理过程的规范性规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences
Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信