THE DETERMINANTS OF THE ADOPTION OF FARM TECHNOLOGY BY RESETTLED FARMERS IN CHINYIKA, ZIMBABWE*

Zambezia Pub Date : 2001-02-01 DOI:10.4314/ZJH.V28I2.6764
Tenkir Bonger
{"title":"THE DETERMINANTS OF THE ADOPTION OF FARM TECHNOLOGY BY RESETTLED FARMERS IN CHINYIKA, ZIMBABWE*","authors":"Tenkir Bonger","doi":"10.4314/ZJH.V28I2.6764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a sample survey of re(settled) households differentiated by whether any member was trained or not and their proximity to the Training Centre, employing Logistic Regression, Chi-Square Test, and Descriptive Statistics, this study examined the relationship between resources and household characteristics, on the one hand, and the probability of being trained or not, on the other. This was followed by an analysis of the log odds of a farm household adopting improved fanning methods in relation to its status with respect to training, distance from the Training Centre and other social characteristics. Unlike with resources owned, there is a more systematic relationship between taking the offer of training with non-resource household characteristics - education, sex, age and the prior residence and occupation of re(settlers). Paradoxically, the probability of a more educated household head joining the course is much smaller than the less educated. Among the hypothesised household characteristics leading to the adoption of improved farming practices, whether the farmer was trained or not is the most important. This is followed by the educational level of female, run households [as actual or de facto heads in the case of migrant husbands]. The results of the logistics regression clearly established a strong and statistically significant relationship between the probability of adoption on the one hand, training and, to some extent, urban origins and prior farming occupations, on the other. Those who own more cattle and oxen are also more likely to train and adopt innovations.","PeriodicalId":83564,"journal":{"name":"Zambezia","volume":"31 1","pages":"167-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zambezia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ZJH.V28I2.6764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Based on a sample survey of re(settled) households differentiated by whether any member was trained or not and their proximity to the Training Centre, employing Logistic Regression, Chi-Square Test, and Descriptive Statistics, this study examined the relationship between resources and household characteristics, on the one hand, and the probability of being trained or not, on the other. This was followed by an analysis of the log odds of a farm household adopting improved fanning methods in relation to its status with respect to training, distance from the Training Centre and other social characteristics. Unlike with resources owned, there is a more systematic relationship between taking the offer of training with non-resource household characteristics - education, sex, age and the prior residence and occupation of re(settlers). Paradoxically, the probability of a more educated household head joining the course is much smaller than the less educated. Among the hypothesised household characteristics leading to the adoption of improved farming practices, whether the farmer was trained or not is the most important. This is followed by the educational level of female, run households [as actual or de facto heads in the case of migrant husbands]. The results of the logistics regression clearly established a strong and statistically significant relationship between the probability of adoption on the one hand, training and, to some extent, urban origins and prior farming occupations, on the other. Those who own more cattle and oxen are also more likely to train and adopt innovations.
津巴布韦奇尼卡重新安置农民采用农业技术的决定因素*
本研究采用Logistic回归、卡方检验和描述性统计等方法,对按成员是否接受过培训和距离培训中心远近区分的再定居家庭进行抽样调查,考察资源与家庭特征之间的关系,以及是否接受过培训的概率。随后分析了一个农户采用改良的耕作方法的对数概率与其在培训方面的地位、与培训中心的距离和其他社会特征之间的关系。与拥有资源不同的是,在接受具有非资源家庭特征的培训- -教育、性别、年龄和重新移民者以前的住所和职业- -之间有更系统的关系。矛盾的是,受教育程度较高的户主参加课程的概率要比受教育程度较低的户主小得多。在导致采用改良耕作方法的假设家庭特征中,农民是否受过培训是最重要的。其次是女性经营家庭的教育水平[在移民丈夫的情况下作为实际或事实上的户主]。后勤回归的结果清楚地确定了收养的可能性与训练之间的关系,以及在某种程度上的城市起源和以前的农业职业之间的关系。那些拥有更多牛和牛的人也更有可能训练和采用创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信