Analysis of the domestic market of compressor and ultrasonic nebulizers

T. Brytanova, A. Samko
{"title":"Analysis of the domestic market of compressor and ultrasonic nebulizers","authors":"T. Brytanova, A. Samko","doi":"10.14739/2409-2932.2022.2.258585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the work is to organize informational files about compressors and ultrasonic nebulizers determination of actuality and availability in marketing analysis of the domestic market.\nMaterials and methods. Data from the Apteka.UA and the official website of Tabletki.ua were used to analyze the brand and assortment structure of ultrasonic and compressor nebulizers. The search analytical, systematic, comparative, and statistical methods and methods of mathematical and logical analysis were used in the work.\nResults. The analysis of the market of assortment and brand structures of the compressor and ultrasonic nebulizers was carried out. The obtained results showed the presence on the market of 16 manufacturers from 10 countries in the world of compressor nebulizers and 9 manufacturers from 7 countries in the world of ultrasonic nebulizers. Among them, the largest suppliers were identified, such as Omron Healthcare (Japan) and LLC Medhouse Swiss GmbH (Ukraine). The calculated stress coefficient indicated greater competition between compressor manufacturers (Kvi = 0.94) compared to ultrasonic (Kvi = 0.88) nebulizers. The level of monopolization was determined using the Herfindahl–Hirschman index. The results indicated a moderately concentrated market for both types of nebulizers. Analysis of socio-economic affordability by indicators of price liquidity ratio and solvency adequacy noted low availability of this group of goods for consumers of pharmacies.\nConclusions. The results of the company structure research indicated the vast majority of manufacturers of foreign companies and a wide range of both ultrasonic and compressor nebulizers. In the course of the work, the available commodity positions in pharmacies in Ukraine were investigated. According to the calculations of the coefficient of tension and the level of monopolization. It was possible to determine the competitiveness among manufacturing firms. The results of the assessment of the liquidity ratio and the adequacy of solvency made it possible to assess the purchasing power of the population in this group of goods.","PeriodicalId":10800,"journal":{"name":"Current issues in pharmacy and medicine: science and practice","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current issues in pharmacy and medicine: science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14739/2409-2932.2022.2.258585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the work is to organize informational files about compressors and ultrasonic nebulizers determination of actuality and availability in marketing analysis of the domestic market. Materials and methods. Data from the Apteka.UA and the official website of Tabletki.ua were used to analyze the brand and assortment structure of ultrasonic and compressor nebulizers. The search analytical, systematic, comparative, and statistical methods and methods of mathematical and logical analysis were used in the work. Results. The analysis of the market of assortment and brand structures of the compressor and ultrasonic nebulizers was carried out. The obtained results showed the presence on the market of 16 manufacturers from 10 countries in the world of compressor nebulizers and 9 manufacturers from 7 countries in the world of ultrasonic nebulizers. Among them, the largest suppliers were identified, such as Omron Healthcare (Japan) and LLC Medhouse Swiss GmbH (Ukraine). The calculated stress coefficient indicated greater competition between compressor manufacturers (Kvi = 0.94) compared to ultrasonic (Kvi = 0.88) nebulizers. The level of monopolization was determined using the Herfindahl–Hirschman index. The results indicated a moderately concentrated market for both types of nebulizers. Analysis of socio-economic affordability by indicators of price liquidity ratio and solvency adequacy noted low availability of this group of goods for consumers of pharmacies. Conclusions. The results of the company structure research indicated the vast majority of manufacturers of foreign companies and a wide range of both ultrasonic and compressor nebulizers. In the course of the work, the available commodity positions in pharmacies in Ukraine were investigated. According to the calculations of the coefficient of tension and the level of monopolization. It was possible to determine the competitiveness among manufacturing firms. The results of the assessment of the liquidity ratio and the adequacy of solvency made it possible to assess the purchasing power of the population in this group of goods.
压缩机和超声波雾化器国内市场分析
本工作的目的是整理有关压缩机和超声波雾化器的资料档案,确定国内市场的现状和可用性。材料和方法。来自Apteka的数据。UA和Tabletki官方网站。采用Ua对超声波雾化器和压缩机雾化器的品牌和品种结构进行了分析。本文采用了搜索分析法、系统分析法、比较法、统计分析法和数理逻辑分析法。对压缩机和超声波雾化器的品种和品牌结构进行了市场分析。结果表明,压缩机雾化器市场上有来自10个国家的16家制造商,超声波雾化器市场上有来自7个国家的9家制造商。其中,确定了最大的供应商,如欧姆龙医疗保健(日本)和LLC Medhouse Swiss GmbH(乌克兰)。计算的应力系数表明,与超声波雾化器(Kvi = 0.88)相比,压缩机制造商(Kvi = 0.94)之间的竞争更激烈。利用赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数确定垄断水平。结果表明,这两种类型的雾化器的市场适度集中。通过价格流动性比率和偿付能力充分性指标对社会经济负担能力的分析表明,这类商品对药店消费者的可获得性很低。对公司结构的研究结果表明,绝大多数国外公司生产的雾化器种类繁多,既有超声波雾化器也有压缩机雾化器。在工作过程中,调查了乌克兰药房的现有商品头寸。根据计算得到的张力系数和垄断程度。有可能确定制造企业之间的竞争力。对流动性比率和偿付能力充分性的评估结果使人们有可能评估人口对这类商品的购买力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信