A Social Network Analysis Approach to Strengthening Nonprofit Collaboration

N. Kapucu, Fatih Demiroz
{"title":"A Social Network Analysis Approach to Strengthening Nonprofit Collaboration","authors":"N. Kapucu, Fatih Demiroz","doi":"10.9774/GLEAF.3709.2015.JA.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionBuilding capacity and expanding services are difficult tasks for nonprofits, particularly if they are younger and smaller. The administrative and financial tasks and delivery of services can easily overwhelm administrators and volunteers. Nonprofits can be established and dissolved easily especially when they lack the human, intellectual, social, and physical capitals necessary to develop and sustain an organization. Capacity building efforts help them reach the missing components for their survival and growth; yet, most of the time they need external support for building capacity (Kapucu, 2012; Kapucu, Augustin, & Krause, 2007).There are different capacity building opportunities for nonprofits helping for better service delivery. Federal, state, and local governments act as nonprofit incubators and provide financial and physical resources, and management consulting via various programs (Hu, Kapucu, & O'Bryne, 2014). Furthermore, nonprofits develop capacity through the collaborative ties they build with their environment. There is a rich literature on the relationship between nonprofits and their environment. Nonprofit organizations' formal and informal ties with the public organizations and other nonprofits help them gain legitimacy, access additional resources, and build capacity over time (Gazley, 2008; Guo & Acar, 2005).Collaborative ties are not formed in a vacuum and understanding the factors influencing how nonprofits build collaborative ties can set the ground work for devising better managerial decisions. There are studies examining the collaboration between government agencies and nonprofits (Gazley & Brudney, 2007), preferential attachments patterns of nonprofits (Guo & Acar, 2005; Harrow, 2011), and collaborative dyadic tie building patterns of nonprofits in general, or relationship between bigger nonprofits and smaller ones (Guo & Acar, 2005). In this study, we concentrate on the collaborative relationships among small nonprofits and try to explain some of the predictors of their collaborative tie building. The literature on collaborative tie building highlights two major predictors: past collaborations and friendships (Isset & Provan, 2005). Following the footsteps of the earlier studies, we examine the role of past collaborations and friendship on new collaborations for small and younger nonprofits. Specifically, in this study, we try to answer the following research question: what relative roles do informal (friendship) ties and past collaboration ties play in the formation of new ties between small nonprofits and their environment? Given the study's focus on collaborative network ties, practitioners and researchers of nonprofit managers could use the findings in understanding how to foster organizational ties with the environment and enhance organizational capacity.We examined small nonprofit organizations in Florida that participated in Strengthening Communities Funds (SCF), a federally funded project aiming to increase the capacities of small nonprofits in economically depressed regions. The program was conducted by the Center for Public and Nonprofit Management (CPNM) at the University of Central Florida (UCF). The purpose of the program was to provide technical, managerial, and financial trainings, as well as financial support in the form of small grants ($30,000 total) to the participants. In other words, the center served as a nonprofit incubator. This research also contributes understanding of how small nonprofits build collaborative ties. Findings of the study can guide policy makers and nonprofit managers nurture their organizations, avoid their demise, and help them grow successfully.The paper is organized as follows: section one presents the theoretical rationale behind this research and the hypotheses being tested; section two provides an overview of the Strengthening Communities Funds and context of the study; and section three provides a detailed explanation of the methodology and the statistical procedures we followed in this research. …","PeriodicalId":90357,"journal":{"name":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","volume":"4 1","pages":"87-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.3709.2015.JA.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

IntroductionBuilding capacity and expanding services are difficult tasks for nonprofits, particularly if they are younger and smaller. The administrative and financial tasks and delivery of services can easily overwhelm administrators and volunteers. Nonprofits can be established and dissolved easily especially when they lack the human, intellectual, social, and physical capitals necessary to develop and sustain an organization. Capacity building efforts help them reach the missing components for their survival and growth; yet, most of the time they need external support for building capacity (Kapucu, 2012; Kapucu, Augustin, & Krause, 2007).There are different capacity building opportunities for nonprofits helping for better service delivery. Federal, state, and local governments act as nonprofit incubators and provide financial and physical resources, and management consulting via various programs (Hu, Kapucu, & O'Bryne, 2014). Furthermore, nonprofits develop capacity through the collaborative ties they build with their environment. There is a rich literature on the relationship between nonprofits and their environment. Nonprofit organizations' formal and informal ties with the public organizations and other nonprofits help them gain legitimacy, access additional resources, and build capacity over time (Gazley, 2008; Guo & Acar, 2005).Collaborative ties are not formed in a vacuum and understanding the factors influencing how nonprofits build collaborative ties can set the ground work for devising better managerial decisions. There are studies examining the collaboration between government agencies and nonprofits (Gazley & Brudney, 2007), preferential attachments patterns of nonprofits (Guo & Acar, 2005; Harrow, 2011), and collaborative dyadic tie building patterns of nonprofits in general, or relationship between bigger nonprofits and smaller ones (Guo & Acar, 2005). In this study, we concentrate on the collaborative relationships among small nonprofits and try to explain some of the predictors of their collaborative tie building. The literature on collaborative tie building highlights two major predictors: past collaborations and friendships (Isset & Provan, 2005). Following the footsteps of the earlier studies, we examine the role of past collaborations and friendship on new collaborations for small and younger nonprofits. Specifically, in this study, we try to answer the following research question: what relative roles do informal (friendship) ties and past collaboration ties play in the formation of new ties between small nonprofits and their environment? Given the study's focus on collaborative network ties, practitioners and researchers of nonprofit managers could use the findings in understanding how to foster organizational ties with the environment and enhance organizational capacity.We examined small nonprofit organizations in Florida that participated in Strengthening Communities Funds (SCF), a federally funded project aiming to increase the capacities of small nonprofits in economically depressed regions. The program was conducted by the Center for Public and Nonprofit Management (CPNM) at the University of Central Florida (UCF). The purpose of the program was to provide technical, managerial, and financial trainings, as well as financial support in the form of small grants ($30,000 total) to the participants. In other words, the center served as a nonprofit incubator. This research also contributes understanding of how small nonprofits build collaborative ties. Findings of the study can guide policy makers and nonprofit managers nurture their organizations, avoid their demise, and help them grow successfully.The paper is organized as follows: section one presents the theoretical rationale behind this research and the hypotheses being tested; section two provides an overview of the Strengthening Communities Funds and context of the study; and section three provides a detailed explanation of the methodology and the statistical procedures we followed in this research. …
加强非营利组织合作的社会网络分析方法
对非营利组织来说,建设能力和扩大服务是一项艰巨的任务,特别是如果它们成立时间较短、规模较小的话。管理和财务任务以及服务的提供很容易使管理人员和志愿者不堪重负。非营利组织可以很容易地建立和解散,特别是当他们缺乏发展和维持组织所必需的人力、智力、社会和物质资本时。能力建设工作帮助他们获得赖以生存和成长的缺失部分;然而,大多数时候,他们需要外部支持来建设能力(Kapucu, 2012;Kapucu, Augustin, & Krause, 2007)。非营利组织有不同的能力建设机会来帮助提供更好的服务。联邦、州和地方政府作为非营利性的孵化器,通过各种项目提供财政和物质资源,以及管理咨询(Hu, Kapucu, & O'Bryne, 2014)。此外,非营利组织通过与环境建立的协作关系来发展能力。关于非营利组织与其环境之间的关系,有大量的文献。非营利组织与公共组织和其他非营利组织的正式和非正式联系有助于他们获得合法性,获得额外的资源,并随着时间的推移建立能力(Gazley, 2008;Guo & Acar, 2005)。协作关系不是在真空中形成的,了解影响非营利组织如何建立协作关系的因素可以为制定更好的管理决策奠定基础。有研究考察了政府机构与非营利组织之间的合作(Gazley & Brudney, 2007),非营利组织的优先依恋模式(Guo & Acar, 2005;Harrow, 2011),以及一般非营利组织的合作二元关系构建模式,或大型非营利组织与小型非营利组织之间的关系(Guo & Acar, 2005)。在本研究中,我们关注小型非营利组织之间的合作关系,并试图解释其合作关系建立的一些预测因素。关于建立合作关系的文献强调了两个主要的预测因素:过去的合作和友谊(Isset & Provan, 2005)。跟随早期研究的脚步,我们研究了过去的合作和友谊对小型和年轻的非营利组织的新合作的作用。具体而言,在本研究中,我们试图回答以下研究问题:非正式(友谊)关系和过去的合作关系在小型非营利组织与其环境之间形成新关系中扮演什么相对角色?鉴于该研究的重点是协作网络联系,非营利组织管理者的从业者和研究人员可以利用这些发现来理解如何促进组织与环境的联系并提高组织能力。我们考察了佛罗里达州参加加强社区基金(SCF)的小型非营利组织,这是一个联邦资助的项目,旨在提高经济不景气地区小型非营利组织的能力。该项目由中佛罗里达大学(UCF)的公共和非营利管理中心(CPNM)开展。该计划的目的是提供技术、管理和财务培训,并以小额赠款(总计3万美元)的形式向参与者提供财政支持。换句话说,这个中心是一个非营利性的孵化器。这项研究也有助于理解小型非营利组织如何建立合作关系。研究结果可以指导政策制定者和非营利组织管理者培养他们的组织,避免他们的消亡,并帮助他们成功成长。本文的组织结构如下:第一部分介绍了本研究的理论基础和所检验的假设;第二节概述了加强社区基金和研究背景;第三部分详细说明了本研究的方法和统计程序。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信