India’s Law School Legal Aid Clinics: The Gaps Between Aspiration and Practice

K. Rajashree, S. Bhardwaj
{"title":"India’s Law School Legal Aid Clinics: The Gaps Between Aspiration and Practice","authors":"K. Rajashree, S. Bhardwaj","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v28i2.1183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The law schools legal aid activities conducted through its clinics has come a long way in India especially since its inception in the early 1970’s. Its evolution has been gradual, intermittent and varied. Although The Bar Council of India (BCI) has mandated, establishing legal aid clinics as a pre-requisite for granting the necessary permissions before law schools start functioning, there are limited ideas of its purpose and objectives. An inherent lack of understanding its importance in terms of teaching, learning and research, the legal aid practices are largely left to the discretion of the individual law schools and interpretations of the individual faculty members. Combined with ideas heavily borrowed from the law schools in the US and individual experiences of the faculty members, legal aid practices in India are diversified. In the backdrop of this, the author intends to explore and map the aspiration of legal aid through an analysis of the key policy documents of legal education since India’s independence through an ontological framework. The ontology maps the aspirations of the legal aid clinics that was intended through these documents. Additionally, a case study of two important institutions have been taken as the case in point in order to verify whether the practices match such aspirations. Thereby, putting forth arguments that are critical for understanding the gaps between the aspiration and the state of reality. \nKey words: Legal aid Clinics, Law schools, Clinical, Legal education, Social justice","PeriodicalId":31794,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19164/ijcle.v28i2.1183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The law schools legal aid activities conducted through its clinics has come a long way in India especially since its inception in the early 1970’s. Its evolution has been gradual, intermittent and varied. Although The Bar Council of India (BCI) has mandated, establishing legal aid clinics as a pre-requisite for granting the necessary permissions before law schools start functioning, there are limited ideas of its purpose and objectives. An inherent lack of understanding its importance in terms of teaching, learning and research, the legal aid practices are largely left to the discretion of the individual law schools and interpretations of the individual faculty members. Combined with ideas heavily borrowed from the law schools in the US and individual experiences of the faculty members, legal aid practices in India are diversified. In the backdrop of this, the author intends to explore and map the aspiration of legal aid through an analysis of the key policy documents of legal education since India’s independence through an ontological framework. The ontology maps the aspirations of the legal aid clinics that was intended through these documents. Additionally, a case study of two important institutions have been taken as the case in point in order to verify whether the practices match such aspirations. Thereby, putting forth arguments that are critical for understanding the gaps between the aspiration and the state of reality. Key words: Legal aid Clinics, Law schools, Clinical, Legal education, Social justice
印度法学院法律援助诊所:愿望与实践之间的差距
法学院通过其诊所开展的法律援助活动在印度取得了长足的进展,特别是自20世纪70年代初成立以来。它的演变是渐进的、断断续续的和多样化的。尽管印度律师协会(BCI)规定,在法律学校开始运作之前,建立法律援助诊所是授予必要许可的先决条件,但人们对其目的和目标的认识有限。由于缺乏对其在教学、学习和研究中的重要性的固有理解,法律援助的实践在很大程度上取决于各个法学院的自由裁量权和个别教员的解释。结合大量借鉴美国法学院的思想和教员的个人经验,印度的法律援助实践是多样化的。在此背景下,笔者试图通过本体论的框架,通过对印度独立以来法律教育的主要政策文件的分析,来探索和描绘法律援助的愿望。本体论通过这些文件描绘了法律援助诊所的愿望。此外,还以两个重要机构的个案研究为例,以核实这些做法是否符合这种愿望。因此,提出对理解愿望和现实状态之间的差距至关重要的论点。关键词:法律援助诊所,法学院,诊所,法律教育,社会公正
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信