PP2 Multiprofessional airway training: a crucial component of safe teamworking in obstetrics

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
M. Aldridge, B. Gupta, C. Dowse
{"title":"PP2 Multiprofessional airway training: a crucial component of safe teamworking in obstetrics","authors":"M. Aldridge, B. Gupta, C. Dowse","doi":"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Airway management during emergency obstetric anaesthesia is associated with higher rates of difficulty and failed intubation.1 This occurs in a high-intensity team setting and involves multiple professional groups. Although team training is used successfully for other obstetric scenarios, this does not commonly cover airway emergencies.2 We aimed to introduce regular simulation-based multiprofessional training at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust specifically designed to encourage team working during airway emergencies in obstetrics. In particular we aimed to identify and reduce the impact of latent safety threats by using in-situ simulation. Summary of Work We identified regular 45-minute sessions to fit with existing staff training to allow attendance by multiple professions when theatre usage was minimal. Obstetricians, midwives, theatre practitioners and anaesthetists were invited to attend, and the sessions were held in the emergency obstetric theatres. The simulated scenario involved both ‘Can’t Intubate Can Oxygenate’ and ‘Can’t Intubate Can’t Oxygenate’ events during an emergency caesarean section, culminating in scalpel cricothyroidotomy on an improvised front-of-neck trainer. The scenario was specifically designed to involve multiple professional groups, with an emphasis on good teamworking and communication which was further developed through post-simulation debriefing. Summary of Results Over 2 pilot sessions there were 10 participants from the multiple professional groups and feedback was positive. In particular non-anaesthetists commented on the benefits of simulating an airway emergency they were otherwise unfamiliar with. Specific areas for discussion included the importance of making team-based decisions in advance regarding failed airway management (i.e. proceed vs. abandon procedure), and the importance of good visibility of the emergency intubation checklist and protocols in the obstetric theatres. This has led to relevant cognitive aids being attached to the video laryngoscopes used in airway emergencies. Discussion and Conclusions Multiprofessional obstetric airway training appears to be well received and beneficial to all participants. In particular our sessions benefited from the in-situ setting and input from multiple professional groups. We have written a training pack designed to allow easy replication of this session, and intend to run this on a regular basis. Materials have been designed to support facilitation by individuals less experienced in simulation-based education, and we hope to empower others from multiple professional groups to deliver this in future. Recommendations Similar training should form an essential component of wider obstetric team training, and could be facilitated by any member of the multiprofessional team with appropriate support and experience. References Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. A national survey of the impact of NAP4 on airway management practice in United Kingdom hospitals: closing the safety gap in anaesthesia, intensive care and the emergency department. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia 2016 Aug 1;117(2):182–90. Winter C, Crofts J, Draycott T, Muchatuta N, editors. PROMPT course manual. Cambridge University Press; 2017 Oct 19.","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Airway management during emergency obstetric anaesthesia is associated with higher rates of difficulty and failed intubation.1 This occurs in a high-intensity team setting and involves multiple professional groups. Although team training is used successfully for other obstetric scenarios, this does not commonly cover airway emergencies.2 We aimed to introduce regular simulation-based multiprofessional training at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust specifically designed to encourage team working during airway emergencies in obstetrics. In particular we aimed to identify and reduce the impact of latent safety threats by using in-situ simulation. Summary of Work We identified regular 45-minute sessions to fit with existing staff training to allow attendance by multiple professions when theatre usage was minimal. Obstetricians, midwives, theatre practitioners and anaesthetists were invited to attend, and the sessions were held in the emergency obstetric theatres. The simulated scenario involved both ‘Can’t Intubate Can Oxygenate’ and ‘Can’t Intubate Can’t Oxygenate’ events during an emergency caesarean section, culminating in scalpel cricothyroidotomy on an improvised front-of-neck trainer. The scenario was specifically designed to involve multiple professional groups, with an emphasis on good teamworking and communication which was further developed through post-simulation debriefing. Summary of Results Over 2 pilot sessions there were 10 participants from the multiple professional groups and feedback was positive. In particular non-anaesthetists commented on the benefits of simulating an airway emergency they were otherwise unfamiliar with. Specific areas for discussion included the importance of making team-based decisions in advance regarding failed airway management (i.e. proceed vs. abandon procedure), and the importance of good visibility of the emergency intubation checklist and protocols in the obstetric theatres. This has led to relevant cognitive aids being attached to the video laryngoscopes used in airway emergencies. Discussion and Conclusions Multiprofessional obstetric airway training appears to be well received and beneficial to all participants. In particular our sessions benefited from the in-situ setting and input from multiple professional groups. We have written a training pack designed to allow easy replication of this session, and intend to run this on a regular basis. Materials have been designed to support facilitation by individuals less experienced in simulation-based education, and we hope to empower others from multiple professional groups to deliver this in future. Recommendations Similar training should form an essential component of wider obstetric team training, and could be facilitated by any member of the multiprofessional team with appropriate support and experience. References Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. A national survey of the impact of NAP4 on airway management practice in United Kingdom hospitals: closing the safety gap in anaesthesia, intensive care and the emergency department. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia 2016 Aug 1;117(2):182–90. Winter C, Crofts J, Draycott T, Muchatuta N, editors. PROMPT course manual. Cambridge University Press; 2017 Oct 19.
PP2多专业气道训练:产科安全团队合作的重要组成部分
背景:急诊产科麻醉期间气道管理与较高的插管困难率和插管失败率相关这发生在高强度的团队环境中,涉及多个专业团体。虽然团队训练成功地用于其他产科情况,但这通常不包括气道紧急情况我们的目标是在布里斯托尔大学医院和韦斯顿NHS基金会信托基金引入定期的基于模拟的多专业培训,专门设计用于鼓励在产科气道紧急情况下的团队合作。特别是,我们旨在通过现场模拟来识别和减少潜在安全威胁的影响。我们确定了定期45分钟的会议,以适应现有的员工培训,以便在剧院使用最少的情况下允许多种专业人员出席。邀请产科医生、助产士、手术室从业人员和麻醉师参加,课程在产科急诊病房举行。模拟的场景包括紧急剖腹产过程中的“无法插管,无法充氧”和“无法插管,无法充氧”事件,最终在临时的前颈部训练器上进行了环甲状软骨切开术。该方案是专门为涉及多个专业小组而设计的,重点是良好的团队合作和沟通,并通过模拟后的汇报进一步发展。在两次试点会议中,来自多个专业团体的10名参与者得到了积极的反馈。特别是非麻醉师评论了模拟气道紧急情况的好处,否则他们不熟悉。讨论的具体领域包括对气道管理失败(即继续或放弃程序)提前作出基于团队的决定的重要性,以及产科手术室急诊插管检查表和规程的良好可视性的重要性。这导致了相关的认知辅助装置被附加到用于气道紧急情况的视频喉镜上。讨论与结论:多专业产科气道培训似乎很受欢迎,对所有参与者都有益。特别是我们的会议受益于现场设置和来自多个专业团体的投入。我们已经编写了一个培训包,旨在方便地复制这个会议,并打算定期运行它。材料的设计是为了支持那些在模拟教育方面经验不足的个人,我们希望将来能够授权来自多个专业团体的其他人来提供这一服务。类似的培训应成为更广泛的产科小组培训的一个重要组成部分,并可由具有适当支持和经验的多专业小组的任何成员提供便利。Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C.一项关于NAP4对英国医院气道管理实践影响的全国性调查:缩小麻醉、重症监护和急诊科的安全差距。中华麻醉学杂志,2016;17(2):182-90。刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,编辑。提示课程手册。剑桥大学出版社;2017年10月19日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信