Trade-off Between Robustness and Worst-Case Performance in Min-Max Optimization

Hinata Edo, Yoshiki Miyauchi, A. Maki, Youhei Akimoto
{"title":"Trade-off Between Robustness and Worst-Case Performance in Min-Max Optimization","authors":"Hinata Edo, Yoshiki Miyauchi, A. Maki, Youhei Akimoto","doi":"10.1145/3583131.3590362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Min-max optimization is an approach to avoid the risk of obtaining a solution whose performance is satisfactory in a simulation scenario but significantly degraded in real-world scenarios, thereby obtaining a robust solution under the worst case in the considered scenarios. However, owing to the trade-off between robustness and worst-case performance, it is often difficult to design a set of scenarios in simulation-based optimization, known as the uncertainty set, which can be a practical barrier to applying min-max optimization. In this study, we propose a novel approach to obtaining the Pareto front of the bi-objective optimization for the size of the uncertainty set and worst-case performance under the uncertainty set. The proposed approach aims to obtain a set of solutions that cover the worst-case performance effectively but are better than a given performance threshold. The effectiveness of each algorithmic component was evaluated through numerical experiments using a synthetic problem. Applications to automatic ship berthing tasks demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed approach and its limitations.","PeriodicalId":89841,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3583131.3590362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Min-max optimization is an approach to avoid the risk of obtaining a solution whose performance is satisfactory in a simulation scenario but significantly degraded in real-world scenarios, thereby obtaining a robust solution under the worst case in the considered scenarios. However, owing to the trade-off between robustness and worst-case performance, it is often difficult to design a set of scenarios in simulation-based optimization, known as the uncertainty set, which can be a practical barrier to applying min-max optimization. In this study, we propose a novel approach to obtaining the Pareto front of the bi-objective optimization for the size of the uncertainty set and worst-case performance under the uncertainty set. The proposed approach aims to obtain a set of solutions that cover the worst-case performance effectively but are better than a given performance threshold. The effectiveness of each algorithmic component was evaluated through numerical experiments using a synthetic problem. Applications to automatic ship berthing tasks demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed approach and its limitations.
最小-最大优化中鲁棒性与最坏情况性能的权衡
最小-最大优化是一种避免在模拟场景下获得性能令人满意但在实际场景下显著下降的解的风险,从而在所考虑的场景中获得最坏情况下的鲁棒解的方法。然而,由于鲁棒性和最坏情况性能之间的权衡,在基于模拟的优化中通常很难设计一组场景,称为不确定性集,这可能是应用最小-最大优化的实际障碍。在本研究中,我们提出了一种新的方法来获得不确定性集的大小和最坏情况下的双目标优化的Pareto前。提出的方法旨在获得一组有效覆盖最坏情况性能但优于给定性能阈值的解决方案。通过一个综合问题的数值实验,评估了各算法组件的有效性。在船舶自动靠泊任务中的应用表明了该方法的有效性和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书