Measuring the Cognitive Load of Software Developers: A Systematic Mapping Study

L. Gonçales, Kleinner Farias, Bruno Carreiro da Silva, Jonathan Fessler
{"title":"Measuring the Cognitive Load of Software Developers: A Systematic Mapping Study","authors":"L. Gonçales, Kleinner Farias, Bruno Carreiro da Silva, Jonathan Fessler","doi":"10.1109/ICPC.2019.00018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: In recent years, several studies explored different facets of the developers' cognitive load while executing tasks related to software engineering. Researchers have proposed and assessed different ways to measure developers' cognitive load at work and some studies have evaluated the interplay between developers' cognitive load and other attributes such as productivity and software quality. Problem: However, the body of knowledge about developers' cognitive load measurement is still dispersed. That hinders the effective use of developers' cognitive load measurements by industry practitioners and makes it difficult for researchers to build new scientific knowledge upon existing results. Objective: This work aims to pinpoint gaps providing a classification and a thematic analysis of studies on the measurement of cognitive load in the context of software engineering. Method: We carried out a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) based on well-established guidelines to investigate nine research questions. In total, 33 articles (out of 2,612) were selected from 11 search engines after a careful filtering process. Results: The main findings are that (1) 55% of the studies adopted electroencephalogram (EEG) technology for monitoring the cognitive load; (2) 51% of the studies applied machine-learning classification algorithms for predicting cognitive load; and (3) 48% of the studies measured cognitive load in the context of programming tasks. Moreover, a taxonomy was derived from the answers of research questions. Conclusion: This SMS highlighted that the precision of machine learning techniques is low for realistic scenarios, despite the combination of a set of features related to developers' cognitive load used on these techniques. Thus, this gap makes the effective integration of the measure of developers' cognitive load in industry still a relevant challenge.","PeriodicalId":6853,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/ACM 27th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)","volume":"8 1","pages":"42-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/ACM 27th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2019.00018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Context: In recent years, several studies explored different facets of the developers' cognitive load while executing tasks related to software engineering. Researchers have proposed and assessed different ways to measure developers' cognitive load at work and some studies have evaluated the interplay between developers' cognitive load and other attributes such as productivity and software quality. Problem: However, the body of knowledge about developers' cognitive load measurement is still dispersed. That hinders the effective use of developers' cognitive load measurements by industry practitioners and makes it difficult for researchers to build new scientific knowledge upon existing results. Objective: This work aims to pinpoint gaps providing a classification and a thematic analysis of studies on the measurement of cognitive load in the context of software engineering. Method: We carried out a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) based on well-established guidelines to investigate nine research questions. In total, 33 articles (out of 2,612) were selected from 11 search engines after a careful filtering process. Results: The main findings are that (1) 55% of the studies adopted electroencephalogram (EEG) technology for monitoring the cognitive load; (2) 51% of the studies applied machine-learning classification algorithms for predicting cognitive load; and (3) 48% of the studies measured cognitive load in the context of programming tasks. Moreover, a taxonomy was derived from the answers of research questions. Conclusion: This SMS highlighted that the precision of machine learning techniques is low for realistic scenarios, despite the combination of a set of features related to developers' cognitive load used on these techniques. Thus, this gap makes the effective integration of the measure of developers' cognitive load in industry still a relevant challenge.
测量软件开发人员的认知负荷:一个系统的映射研究
背景:近年来,一些研究探索了开发人员在执行与软件工程相关的任务时认知负荷的不同方面。研究人员提出并评估了不同的方法来测量开发人员在工作中的认知负荷,一些研究已经评估了开发人员的认知负荷与其他属性(如生产力和软件质量)之间的相互作用。问题:然而,关于开发人员认知负荷测量的知识体系仍然很分散。这阻碍了行业从业者有效地使用开发人员的认知负荷测量,并使研究人员难以在现有结果的基础上建立新的科学知识。目的:这项工作的目的是查明差距,提供分类和专题分析的研究在软件工程的背景下测量认知负荷。方法:我们在完善的指导方针的基础上进行了系统制图研究(SMS),调查了9个研究问题。经过仔细的筛选,从11个搜索引擎中选出了33篇(2612篇)文章。结果:主要发现:(1)55%的研究采用脑电图(EEG)技术监测认知负荷;(2) 51%的研究应用机器学习分类算法预测认知负荷;(3) 48%的研究测量了编程任务背景下的认知负荷。此外,从研究问题的答案中得出了分类。结论:这篇短信强调了机器学习技术在现实场景中的精度很低,尽管这些技术结合了一组与开发人员认知负荷相关的功能。因此,这一差距使得开发人员认知负荷测量的有效整合仍然是一个相关的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信